![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-08-09 15:02:27 -0400, Todd said:
For those of you who missed my prior posts on the subject, the "Kármán gait" is the explanation of the fluid dynamics involved in a trout holding its position is moving/turbulent water while expending little or no energy to do such. Here is an excellent link to the "The Journal of Experimental Biology" where the paper was published on the "Kármán gait". http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/conten...act/206/6/1059 There is also lovely underwater video footage of it in Ozzie Ozefovich's, "Underwater World of Trout - Feeding Lies". Ozzie also has wonderful underwater footage of trout feeding off the drift too. The "drift" is a description of trout food caught in the current that drifts by a trout's nose while he is Kármán gaiting in his feeding lie. I would love it if Ozzie would make up a screen saver of some of his Kármán gaiting footage. But, then again, I'd probably never get any work done. eyes rolling |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/09/2010 01:43 PM, D. LaCourse wrote:
On 2010-08-09 15:02:27 -0400, Todd said: For those of you who missed my prior posts on the subject, the "Kármán gait" is the explanation of the fluid dynamics involved in a trout holding its position is moving/turbulent water while expending little or no energy to do such. Here is an excellent link to the "The Journal of Experimental Biology" where the paper was published on the "Kármán gait". http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/conten...act/206/6/1059 There is also lovely underwater video footage of it in Ozzie Ozefovich's, "Underwater World of Trout - Feeding Lies". Ozzie also has wonderful underwater footage of trout feeding off the drift too. The "drift" is a description of trout food caught in the current that drifts by a trout's nose while he is Kármán gaiting in his feeding lie. I would love it if Ozzie would make up a screen saver of some of his Kármán gaiting footage. But, then again, I'd probably never get any work done. eyes rolling Hi Dave, Is there some part of the The Journal of Experimental Biology's paper that you disagree with? I would love hear your criticism of it. The more about trout behavior I learn, the better a fisherman I become. Or, perhaps, you were just giving me a bad time. :-) -T |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Todd" wrote in message
... These trout must have been caught several times before. About every third drift, I would tangle with one. It seemed like I would play with them for about two feet and then they got loose. Over and over again too! I checked my hook points constantly and they were not broken off and were plenty sharp. When trout are non-hooked on dries, it might be worth trying an English-style delayed strike i.e. a pause before setting the hook. The theory is that, after waiting until the fish turns his head downwards, the hook point pulls into the corner of the jaw, where it catches better than up at the bony front tip of the mouth. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Phillipson wrote:
When trout are non-hooked on dries, it might be worth trying an English-style delayed strike i.e. a pause before setting the hook. The theory is that, after waiting until the fish turns his head downwards, the hook point pulls into the corner of the jaw, where it catches better than up at the bony front tip of the mouth. The English style is to mutter "God save the Queen" before setting the hook. Here in the colonies I use the American style which is very similar except I change the word "save" to a common expression meaning fornication. This is similar to a tradition among marathon runners. The original marathon, the distance from Marathon, Greece to Athens, is 24.85 miles. At the 1908 Olympics in London they added 2.2 miles so the ****in' brit royalty could watch the finish from their viewing box. To this day English style runners yell "God save the Queen" at mile marker 24. American runners yell that other thing I was talking about. ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
... The English style is to mutter "God save the Queen" before setting the hook. Here in the colonies I use the American style which is very similar except I change the word "save" to a common expression meaning fornication. Sour grapes. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Phillipson wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: The English style is to mutter "God save the Queen" before setting the hook. Here in the colonies I use the American style which is very similar except I change the word "save" to a common expression meaning fornication. Sour grapes. Sour grapes ? Over a queen ? Not so much. Hell, we have plenty of queens here in the States, the gay bars are full of them. And the taxpayers don't have to pay for their castles. ;-) -- Ken Fortenberry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/09/2010 08:26 AM, Don Phillipson wrote:
wrote in message ... These trout must have been caught several times before. About every third drift, I would tangle with one. It seemed like I would play with them for about two feet and then they got loose. Over and over again too! I checked my hook points constantly and they were not broken off and were plenty sharp. When trout are non-hooked on dries, it might be worth trying an English-style delayed strike i.e. a pause before setting the hook. The theory is that, after waiting until the fish turns his head downwards, the hook point pulls into the corner of the jaw, where it catches better than up at the bony front tip of the mouth. I was definitely not doing that. I was just letting them have it the second they struck. This resulted in dragging them a few feet before they took off for parts unknown. My thought was that I only have a fraction of a second before the trout tastes the thing and determines it to be debris. This has always done me well in the past, but since I can't seem to hook them now, I will definitely give this a try. Thank you! -T |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 10:29*pm, Todd wrote:
Hi All, I got to spend a whole hour and ten minutes on the river last Thursday. *Had something unusual happen to me that I would love the groups advice on. These trout must have been caught several times before. About every third drift, I would tangle with one. *It seemed like I would play with them for about two feet and then they got loose. *Over and over again too! I checked my hook points constantly and they were not broken off and were plenty sharp. One trout I got so frustrated with, to set the hook, I dragged him about four feet across the top of a rapid. *And he still got away! *I could almost hear him yelling "Yippee! Again! Again!" *(I may be putting human emotions on him.) I had the feeling I was playing tug-o-war with them and had not actually hooked any of them. They seemed to like all types of flies I tossed at them. They would get use to one and I would put on a different type. *They were all in the size 12 to 14 range. What would the group suggest? *Smaller flies? *Larger flies? *Flies with round hooks? *Shake my fish at them and try not to grin too much? Many thanks, -T p.s. I got to meet one 7" rainbow. *He nearly swallowed my #14 Adams. *I think he was native as he was about two inches smaller than what they plant and he was not so danged ugly. With barbless hooks I think a large portion of small trout get the hook inside their mouths, but the hook point is tipped enuf so it doesn't stick tissue. Just be happy you fooled em, and don't have to touch (and hurt) fish that will grow into tommorrow's sport. As to the "waiting" to strike advise, generally good but less appropriate on surface and more so for salmon/steelhead. IMHO Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/09/2010 11:53 AM, DaveS wrote:
With barbless hooks I think a large portion of small trout get the hook inside their mouths, but the hook point is tipped enuf so it doesn't stick tissue. Just be happy you fooled em, and don't have to touch (and hurt) fish that will grow into tommorrow's sport. As to the "waiting" to strike advise, generally good but less appropriate on surface and more so for salmon/steelhead. IMHO Dave Thank you! The fish here are generally in the 9 to 11" range. I switched back to a barbed hook abut a month ago because my barbless hooks were going clean through their lips and its was a mess trying to remove them without further injuring the fish. The barbed hooks came out very easily. It was only last Thursday that I have had any trouble hooking them. And yes, I was happy. I had a total blast. Almost could not force myself to come home. -T |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting up a big box for extra flies | mdk77[_2_] | Fly Fishing | 11 | November 19th, 2007 09:35 AM |
Setting up a sea fishing rod | doctorcrippin | UK Sea Fishing | 0 | August 10th, 2007 12:05 PM |
Fishing 101: Setting the hook? | werlax | General Discussion | 3 | June 14th, 2004 08:27 AM |
Cabin fever is setting in already.. | Frank Church | Fly Fishing | 19 | December 21st, 2003 10:41 PM |
Help setting up a pole | Leppings | UK Coarse Fishing | 7 | December 13th, 2003 11:00 PM |