![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it's fairly well known menhaden (bunker, pogies, etc.) are being
overfished on the east coast. virginia fishery management is the principal villain because of the commercial practices it allows...practices that every other state has banned. nc is a bit stricter, but a co-villain nontheless. lots of articles over the last few years in various fishing, science, and resource literature...here's a basic sample: "it supports many species from popular sport fish all the way up to Atlantic whales. And if the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean are where the menhaden call home, this little fish could win the Good Housekeeping Award. That's because the menhaden is a filter-feeder, meaning it cleans impurities in the water. That's crucial to the Chesapeake Bay, where water pollution from farm and sewage runoff is creating increasingly severe problems for the bay and its inhabitants. But this hard-working little fish is disappearing fast, and its job in the food chain is irreplaceable. The menhaden is not only a small fish, but it's also rather bony - not exactly appetizing for most people. But there is an enormous fishing operation sucking millions of these little fish out of coastal waters every year. In fact, menhaden make up America's second largest fishery. So, if people aren't eating the menhaden, why is this little fish being targeted? The Omega Protein company vacuums massive quantities - hundreds of thousands of tons - of menhaden through state-of-the-art factory fishing vessels that locate entire schools of these tiny fish. The company then processes menhaden for use as protein supplements and fishmeal. Ironically, much of Omega's fishmeal is sold to feed livestock or fish farms - uses that harm marine ecosystems and threaten fishing communities. In fact, one of the main uses for Omega's fishmeal is as chicken feed, adding to the high-nutrient wastes already choking many bays and estuaries - including the Chesapeake. Runoff from chicken farms is also connected to the outbreak of toxic algae in the mid-Atlantic region. Omega fishmeal is also used as food for large-scale fish farms, which privatize the oceans and threaten wild fish stocks and traditional fisheries through pollution and parasitic infestations, among other dangers. Most of the remaining fishmeal goes into pet food. Menhaden populations today are at near record lows, and there are reports that some of their predators are starting to go hungry. The time to act is now, before the tiny menhaden is lost forever." jeff On 11/30/2011 8:19 PM, Tom Littleton wrote: On 11/30/2011 8:33 AM, jeff wrote: economic realities and effective resource management realities often conflict...and politicians are the worst managers of each. i personally think the pendulum has swung wildly to policies of personal greed and consumption in most of the southern coastal states. the outer banks and barrier islands of virginia and the carolinas are unique and precious resources that need protection from human over-development and over-consumption. in north carolina, we have limited and managed vehicle use on our beaches. i'm all for the appropriate management and limitation of vehicular traffic on beaches. unmanaged, the fools ruin the beaches for everyone, including those who responsibly travel on the sand, and for the wildlife. they four-wheel over dunes and sea oats. they drive over nesting sites. they disrupt and irreparably damage an already fragile eco-system. that said...weather and sea always have the final say. i am a proponent of no vehicles on fragile beaches and barrier islands. hell, i'm a proponent of no vehicles on any beach. that said...there are some areas and beaches that seem to tolerate the use. most of nc's core banks...a national seashore including cape lookout...has a long history of managed beach vehicle use. ...and tom...how about getting the virginia fat cats focused on the destructive commercial menhaden fishing up there! g see prior reply to Dave on the details of how the entire coast on the Eastern Shore is managed. I think it's a workable compromise, having one island with some access. As for the bunker fishing, I didn't realize the little devils were all that threatened. Hell, around 2 million of them turn up in harbors from Quimby down to Cape Charles every year due to oxygen turnover alone. You could walk across Quimby harbor on a bad day on a layer of dead bunker(ahem, mehaden). Fill me in, counselor....... Tom |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/03/23/menhaden/
http://hamptonroads.com/2011/01/bill...ort-once-again On 11/30/2011 8:19 PM, Tom Littleton wrote: On 11/30/2011 8:33 AM, jeff wrote: economic realities and effective resource management realities often conflict...and politicians are the worst managers of each. i personally think the pendulum has swung wildly to policies of personal greed and consumption in most of the southern coastal states. the outer banks and barrier islands of virginia and the carolinas are unique and precious resources that need protection from human over-development and over-consumption. in north carolina, we have limited and managed vehicle use on our beaches. i'm all for the appropriate management and limitation of vehicular traffic on beaches. unmanaged, the fools ruin the beaches for everyone, including those who responsibly travel on the sand, and for the wildlife. they four-wheel over dunes and sea oats. they drive over nesting sites. they disrupt and irreparably damage an already fragile eco-system. that said...weather and sea always have the final say. i am a proponent of no vehicles on fragile beaches and barrier islands. hell, i'm a proponent of no vehicles on any beach. that said...there are some areas and beaches that seem to tolerate the use. most of nc's core banks...a national seashore including cape lookout...has a long history of managed beach vehicle use. ...and tom...how about getting the virginia fat cats focused on the destructive commercial menhaden fishing up there! g see prior reply to Dave on the details of how the entire coast on the Eastern Shore is managed. I think it's a workable compromise, having one island with some access. As for the bunker fishing, I didn't realize the little devils were all that threatened. Hell, around 2 million of them turn up in harbors from Quimby down to Cape Charles every year due to oxygen turnover alone. You could walk across Quimby harbor on a bad day on a layer of dead bunker(ahem, mehaden). Fill me in, counselor....... Tom |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nd
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 30, 5:13*pm, Tom Littleton wrote:
On 11/29/2011 9:24 PM, DaveS wrote: So I guess that means that the beach keeps disappearing due to "climate change" and the rest of the parking lot disappears in the next storm? . . . meanwhile the "influential types" keep using their "influence" to maintain their vehicular fishing access, instead of being leaders in facing up to the facts of "climate change?" Dave Beaches come and go even with or without "climate change," leaving less and less sand in which to bury ones head. The only constant is the ability of "influentials" to intimidate bureaucrats charged with protecting the broader national interest in the face of unpleasant realities. God only knows what point you are trying to make here, but you are demonstrating that you have no clue of the relevant details or local background. Assateague is the northern-most of 8 barrier islands on the Virginia Eastern Shore. None are developed at all, Assateague is the only one with a causeway bridge leading onto it. The others are reachable by a short boat trip. Being barrier islands and all, they all constantly shift. Not being developed, they effectively protect the inner coastal regions. Assateague was designated as a national seashore, thus for public enjoyment, back in the 1960's. It only later got converted into a National Wildlife Refuge, a decision the locals had no input into. As for vehicular access, I see no problem allowing it as always, given the same wildlife inhabits and nests on Cedar, Metompkin, Parramore, and the rest of the islands down to Smith Island. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom Did you read the Washington Post article? As to local knowledge . . . you are probably not aware that I was the original Misty's dialogue coach and keeper of the sugar cubes, but then again that bitch mare was about as generous with the credits as Madonna in her day, and she **** inside her trailer between just about every take. So don't blame me if your so-called "GOD" won't straighten you out on this deal. Seriously, read the article. Dave |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fishing spot | asnodin dianalan | Bass Fishing | 3 | March 12th, 2011 04:14 AM |
The fishing spot | plumbcrazy | Fishing in Canada | 0 | September 20th, 2006 09:29 PM |
baiting a fishing spot | Bob La Londe | General Discussion | 6 | November 23rd, 2003 02:10 PM |
baiting a fishing spot | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 2 | November 15th, 2003 01:27 AM |
Fishing spot in So. Cal | MC | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | October 22nd, 2003 01:59 AM |