![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well in that case it looks like Mr. Cod is the most-likely suspect.
Thanks for all the good info Pepperoni. -Kent "Pepperoni" wrote in message ... Tomcod are like prawns--- as likely to be in fresh water as salt. brackish mixed waters. I presume it was chosen because of its small size, rarely over a foot long.... similar to a large bluegill in size. Not a great tackle-buster, at any rate. I live on the Great Lakes. Most of our best sport fish are now adapted from salt water varieties, but never see the sea. Chinooks, atlantics, cohos, several types of striper/wiper/white bass hybrids. Pepperoni "K" wrote in message link.net... Well this is interesting. Pepperoni, your suggestion of "tommy cod" seems very good because if one does some searches, that's the only variation of names that actually produces references to a fish by that name, like in that site you mentioned. I've found several other sites today that refer to both "tomcods" and "tommy cods". But Ahab, you make a good point, too. While we don't really know if the "pond" Quint is referring to is a typical fresh-water pond or the salt water "pond" (which they had in Amity), it seems more likely that he might be referring to a fresh-water pond simply because bluegills are fresh-water fish and Quint named both fish in the same sentence. That's another reason I thought that "tommy cats" was what he was saying. I assumed that was some type of catfish and that would all make sense. Except of course for the fact that "tommy cat" just doesn't seem to be a name of any fish at all and doesn't show up on any web sites that I've found. wrote in message ... On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 18:07:05 -0400, "Pepperoni" wrote: ....Maybe "tommycod" (Tomcod) 9-12 inches long (may be 15) The frame of reference would lead one to think he was speaking of fresh water fish. http://octopus.gma.org/fogm/Microgadus_tomcod.htm "K" wrote in message hlink.net... I figured a fishing group was the best place to ask this one... In the movie Jaws, Robert Shaw playing the part of Quint delivers one of his memorable speeches in the town hall meeting. It goes: "Y'all know me. Know how I earn a livin'. I'll catch this bird for ya, but it ain't gonna be easy... Bad fish. It's not like goin' down to the pond chasin' bluegills or something. Anyone know what that something is? It seems people have different interpretations of what he said, including "tommycats", tommycots", and "tommycocks". I've done searches on all three but so far haven't come up with anything relating to fish. Anyone know what fish he was referring to? To me it kind of sounds like "tommycats", but it's kind of hard to tell because in the movie he was sticking a potato chip or something in his mouth just as he said it. Thanks for any ideas. -Kent |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well in that case it looks like Mr. Cod is the most-likely suspect.
Thanks for all the good info Pepperoni. -Kent "Pepperoni" wrote in message ... Tomcod are like prawns--- as likely to be in fresh water as salt. brackish mixed waters. I presume it was chosen because of its small size, rarely over a foot long.... similar to a large bluegill in size. Not a great tackle-buster, at any rate. I live on the Great Lakes. Most of our best sport fish are now adapted from salt water varieties, but never see the sea. Chinooks, atlantics, cohos, several types of striper/wiper/white bass hybrids. Pepperoni "K" wrote in message link.net... Well this is interesting. Pepperoni, your suggestion of "tommy cod" seems very good because if one does some searches, that's the only variation of names that actually produces references to a fish by that name, like in that site you mentioned. I've found several other sites today that refer to both "tomcods" and "tommy cods". But Ahab, you make a good point, too. While we don't really know if the "pond" Quint is referring to is a typical fresh-water pond or the salt water "pond" (which they had in Amity), it seems more likely that he might be referring to a fresh-water pond simply because bluegills are fresh-water fish and Quint named both fish in the same sentence. That's another reason I thought that "tommy cats" was what he was saying. I assumed that was some type of catfish and that would all make sense. Except of course for the fact that "tommy cat" just doesn't seem to be a name of any fish at all and doesn't show up on any web sites that I've found. wrote in message ... On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 18:07:05 -0400, "Pepperoni" wrote: ....Maybe "tommycod" (Tomcod) 9-12 inches long (may be 15) The frame of reference would lead one to think he was speaking of fresh water fish. http://octopus.gma.org/fogm/Microgadus_tomcod.htm "K" wrote in message hlink.net... I figured a fishing group was the best place to ask this one... In the movie Jaws, Robert Shaw playing the part of Quint delivers one of his memorable speeches in the town hall meeting. It goes: "Y'all know me. Know how I earn a livin'. I'll catch this bird for ya, but it ain't gonna be easy... Bad fish. It's not like goin' down to the pond chasin' bluegills or something. Anyone know what that something is? It seems people have different interpretations of what he said, including "tommycats", tommycots", and "tommycocks". I've done searches on all three but so far haven't come up with anything relating to fish. Anyone know what fish he was referring to? To me it kind of sounds like "tommycats", but it's kind of hard to tell because in the movie he was sticking a potato chip or something in his mouth just as he said it. Thanks for any ideas. -Kent |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pepperoni wrote:
wrote in message ... I suggest that a "foot long bluegill" is going to "bust" your tackle unless you hook him on bass fishing gear -- even then he'll let you know he was there ;-) Cheers I fish 'em on 4# test. They run more like 11 1/4 inches. Not a big problem on open water, if you don't mind the boat spinning around the anchor rope a few times. Once a bluegill gets that big, he's too big for most of the pike to handle. They hunt in packs and fear nothing. I've seen them hunting in a line at dawn, with their backs out of the water---- looks like a snake or something moving on the surface. They are swimming with their eyes just below the surface, hunting bugs, I presume. People think of bluegills as 4-5 inches and kid stuff, but a limit stringer of 25 big gills weighs about 50 pounds and is a real "event" on the boat ramp. People seing a full string for the first time, just can't believe it. You're right and people would be within their right not to believe it. The World record Bluegill was a little over 4 pounds and just a tad over 14 inches in length. IIRC the Florida state record is less than 3 pounds and they grow big down there in that kind of climate. Anywhere a Pike will live is not the ideal climate for Bluegill so you would have to excuse me if I suspect I'm hearing a fish story. Sure you are not confusing Bluegill with Yellow Perch or something? Hunting in packs, in a line, with their backs out of the water and eyes just below the surface ................. sorry, a Bluegills natural shape which is like a dinner plate doesn't allow this to happen. Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pepperoni wrote:
wrote in message ... I suggest that a "foot long bluegill" is going to "bust" your tackle unless you hook him on bass fishing gear -- even then he'll let you know he was there ;-) Cheers I fish 'em on 4# test. They run more like 11 1/4 inches. Not a big problem on open water, if you don't mind the boat spinning around the anchor rope a few times. Once a bluegill gets that big, he's too big for most of the pike to handle. They hunt in packs and fear nothing. I've seen them hunting in a line at dawn, with their backs out of the water---- looks like a snake or something moving on the surface. They are swimming with their eyes just below the surface, hunting bugs, I presume. People think of bluegills as 4-5 inches and kid stuff, but a limit stringer of 25 big gills weighs about 50 pounds and is a real "event" on the boat ramp. People seing a full string for the first time, just can't believe it. You're right and people would be within their right not to believe it. The World record Bluegill was a little over 4 pounds and just a tad over 14 inches in length. IIRC the Florida state record is less than 3 pounds and they grow big down there in that kind of climate. Anywhere a Pike will live is not the ideal climate for Bluegill so you would have to excuse me if I suspect I'm hearing a fish story. Sure you are not confusing Bluegill with Yellow Perch or something? Hunting in packs, in a line, with their backs out of the water and eyes just below the surface ................. sorry, a Bluegills natural shape which is like a dinner plate doesn't allow this to happen. Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry wrote:
Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry True they are fighters False they will bust 4# line in a heart beat That is if you have your drag set right, and they don't snag you up My personal 4 lb test record fish is a 22 lb flat head catfish, it did take a very long time to get a net on it,, but we did it (I had help netting it) I was blue gill fishing and the flat head hit a single cricket on an number 8 long shank hook, I had a 12 foot fly weight crappie rod , and a reel with 200 yds of 4 # test on it, I really doubt if I could have landed it with a different rod, that limber rod took a lot of shock out of the line Now a real fighter is the hybrid stripe, it puts the L.M. to shame, this spring I landed nearly a 12 lber on 6 lb test line, I was not fishing for hybrids when this fish hit, If I had known there were any there, I would have reached over in the truck and pulled out a much heaver rig with 17 Lb test on it. I was fishing for little two lb spotted bass, they are a blast on that ultra light rig, I got the shock of my life when that striper, nearly spooled me before it ever turned I have photo's of the fish and the little rig I caught him on -- Rodney Long, Inventor of the Long Shot "WIGGLE" rig, SpecTastic Thread Boomerang Fishing Pro. ,Stand Out Hooks ,Stand Out Lures, Mojo's Rock Hopper & Rig Saver weights, Decoy Activator and the EZKnot http://www.ezknot.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry wrote:
Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry True they are fighters False they will bust 4# line in a heart beat That is if you have your drag set right, and they don't snag you up My personal 4 lb test record fish is a 22 lb flat head catfish, it did take a very long time to get a net on it,, but we did it (I had help netting it) I was blue gill fishing and the flat head hit a single cricket on an number 8 long shank hook, I had a 12 foot fly weight crappie rod , and a reel with 200 yds of 4 # test on it, I really doubt if I could have landed it with a different rod, that limber rod took a lot of shock out of the line Now a real fighter is the hybrid stripe, it puts the L.M. to shame, this spring I landed nearly a 12 lber on 6 lb test line, I was not fishing for hybrids when this fish hit, If I had known there were any there, I would have reached over in the truck and pulled out a much heaver rig with 17 Lb test on it. I was fishing for little two lb spotted bass, they are a blast on that ultra light rig, I got the shock of my life when that striper, nearly spooled me before it ever turned I have photo's of the fish and the little rig I caught him on -- Rodney Long, Inventor of the Long Shot "WIGGLE" rig, SpecTastic Thread Boomerang Fishing Pro. ,Stand Out Hooks ,Stand Out Lures, Mojo's Rock Hopper & Rig Saver weights, Decoy Activator and the EZKnot http://www.ezknot.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry" wrote in message hlink.net... Pepperoni wrote: wrote in message ... I fish 'em on 4# test. They run more like 11 1/4 inches. Not a big problem on open water, if you don't mind the boat spinning around the anchor rope a few times. Once a bluegill gets that big, he's too big for most of the pike to handle. They hunt in packs and fear nothing. I've seen them hunting in a line at dawn, with their backs out of the water---- looks like a snake or something moving on the surface. They are swimming with their eyes just below the surface, hunting bugs, I presume. People think of bluegills as 4-5 inches and kid stuff, but a limit stringer of 25 big gills weighs about 50 pounds and is a real "event" on the boat ramp. People seing a full string for the first time, just can't believe it. You're right and people would be within their right not to believe it. The World record Bluegill was a little over 4 pounds and just a tad over 14 inches in length. IIRC the Florida state record is less than 3 pounds and they grow big down there in that kind of climate. Anywhere a Pike will live is not the ideal climate for Bluegill so you would have to excuse me if I suspect I'm hearing a fish story. Sure you are not confusing Bluegill with Yellow Perch or something? Hunting in packs, in a line, with their backs out of the water and eyes just below the surface ................. sorry, a Bluegills natural shape which is like a dinner plate doesn't allow this to happen. Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry Well, I suppose you have never seen 'gills swimming the surface. It is a strange sight until you figure out what it is. Their shape is the reason their backs will show as little crescents, and a school moving this way (in a line) makes it look like some other strange critter. I assure you, Michigan grows some fine bluegills. The large ones like big water and are predatory. They hunt in packs and are too big for all but the largest pike to eat. We sometimes do catch them with the scales rubbed off of one side where a pike has TRIED to eat one. Michigan state record was 2lb 12 oz, and 13.75 inches, caught in 1983 in Alcona County. (which is 200 miles north of here) http://www.hotspotfishing.com/record...s-Michigan.asp I rarely break off anything using 4# test. Fishing in open water with a smooth drag and a 12 foot UL rod. He's not going anywhere. I do use a landing net. Don't write off light tackle. I've been catching flatheads this year with my UL rod and reel. (I did go to superlines for the heavy guys, though) http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/flathead2.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/earlymorncarp.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/flathead1.jpg The rod is the upper section of one of my 12 foot rods with a handle kit. The short (6') length makes fishing the brush along the river easier. It's still a bit whippy, but works well with the spiderwire, which has no stretch. These were the first flatheads I've seen on the river. We do have some fine channels. though. flatheads, 8-12 pounds caught on hot dog bait, carp to 22 pounds caught on corn. All handled with a 6 foot UL rod rated for 4# test. That spiderwire is great for cutting weeds. I have a huge arc mowed; I just let the big carp run and listen to the weeds getting cut. tonk, tonk, tonk. Pepperoni |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry" wrote in message hlink.net... Pepperoni wrote: wrote in message ... I fish 'em on 4# test. They run more like 11 1/4 inches. Not a big problem on open water, if you don't mind the boat spinning around the anchor rope a few times. Once a bluegill gets that big, he's too big for most of the pike to handle. They hunt in packs and fear nothing. I've seen them hunting in a line at dawn, with their backs out of the water---- looks like a snake or something moving on the surface. They are swimming with their eyes just below the surface, hunting bugs, I presume. People think of bluegills as 4-5 inches and kid stuff, but a limit stringer of 25 big gills weighs about 50 pounds and is a real "event" on the boat ramp. People seing a full string for the first time, just can't believe it. You're right and people would be within their right not to believe it. The World record Bluegill was a little over 4 pounds and just a tad over 14 inches in length. IIRC the Florida state record is less than 3 pounds and they grow big down there in that kind of climate. Anywhere a Pike will live is not the ideal climate for Bluegill so you would have to excuse me if I suspect I'm hearing a fish story. Sure you are not confusing Bluegill with Yellow Perch or something? Hunting in packs, in a line, with their backs out of the water and eyes just below the surface ................. sorry, a Bluegills natural shape which is like a dinner plate doesn't allow this to happen. Not calling you a liar mind you, only just as I said I suspect a fish story being spun here. BTW, a 11.25 inch Bluegill would bust 4# test line in a heart beat. Pound for pound they will out fight a large mouth bass any day. Jerry Well, I suppose you have never seen 'gills swimming the surface. It is a strange sight until you figure out what it is. Their shape is the reason their backs will show as little crescents, and a school moving this way (in a line) makes it look like some other strange critter. I assure you, Michigan grows some fine bluegills. The large ones like big water and are predatory. They hunt in packs and are too big for all but the largest pike to eat. We sometimes do catch them with the scales rubbed off of one side where a pike has TRIED to eat one. Michigan state record was 2lb 12 oz, and 13.75 inches, caught in 1983 in Alcona County. (which is 200 miles north of here) http://www.hotspotfishing.com/record...s-Michigan.asp I rarely break off anything using 4# test. Fishing in open water with a smooth drag and a 12 foot UL rod. He's not going anywhere. I do use a landing net. Don't write off light tackle. I've been catching flatheads this year with my UL rod and reel. (I did go to superlines for the heavy guys, though) http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/flathead2.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/earlymorncarp.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~catfisher88/flathead1.jpg The rod is the upper section of one of my 12 foot rods with a handle kit. The short (6') length makes fishing the brush along the river easier. It's still a bit whippy, but works well with the spiderwire, which has no stretch. These were the first flatheads I've seen on the river. We do have some fine channels. though. flatheads, 8-12 pounds caught on hot dog bait, carp to 22 pounds caught on corn. All handled with a 6 foot UL rod rated for 4# test. That spiderwire is great for cutting weeds. I have a huge arc mowed; I just let the big carp run and listen to the weeds getting cut. tonk, tonk, tonk. Pepperoni |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suggest that a "foot long bluegill" is going to "bust" your tackle
unless you hook him on bass fishing gear -- even then he'll let you know he was there ;-) Cheers I catch 9 to 10 inch bluegill weighing 12 to 16 ounces out of my pond regularly - on a Shakesphere ultralight rod and reel and 4 pound line. Don't think I have caught a 12 incher yet - they are still growing - but I don't think one two inches longer is gonna be that much stronger. I have caught two pound bass 14 inches long on that same outfit and the bass fight harder, but they are bigger. Ronnie http://fishing.about.com |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suggest that a "foot long bluegill" is going to "bust" your tackle
unless you hook him on bass fishing gear -- even then he'll let you know he was there ;-) Cheers I catch 9 to 10 inch bluegill weighing 12 to 16 ounces out of my pond regularly - on a Shakesphere ultralight rod and reel and 4 pound line. Don't think I have caught a 12 incher yet - they are still growing - but I don't think one two inches longer is gonna be that much stronger. I have caught two pound bass 14 inches long on that same outfit and the bass fight harder, but they are bigger. Ronnie http://fishing.about.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Super specific question: rod tube, 7' 3-piece... | Tim G | Fly Fishing | 2 | July 14th, 2004 07:12 PM |
anchor question...>>> | Marty S. | General Discussion | 45 | June 23rd, 2004 04:16 PM |
Lanyard question | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing | 14 | May 13th, 2004 02:36 PM |
Need Help-Rod Purchase Question | Suthern Transplant | Bass Fishing | 11 | February 4th, 2004 11:32 PM |
Tournament Question | Chuck Coger | Bass Fishing | 7 | October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM |