A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th, 2005, 01:07 AM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
k.net...

"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
The economy is important too.


Forbes Magazine said, a couple of years ago, that Clinton had the best
economic record of any president since WW II.

I don't suppose you remember a guy named Forbes who wanted to be the
REPUBLICAN candidate for the Presidency a few years ago.

vince


That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican
Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years, and
the huge dot.bomb bust that cranked up a huge amount of surplus money to
the Fed's.


Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang


  #2  
Old November 15th, 2005, 01:41 AM
JR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert

Bill McKee wrote:

That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican
Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years ...


Thing is, you really believe this nonsense, don't you?.....
  #3  
Old November 15th, 2005, 02:01 AM
rw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert

Bill McKee wrote:

That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican
Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years, and
the huge dot.bomb bust that cranked up a huge amount of surplus money to the
Fed's.


If I have to choose between a lucky, intelligent, involved, popular,
randy-assed President and, well, lets just say someone the opposite,
that's an easy choice.

BTW, I see that those Republicans are doing a phenomenally ****ty job of
controlling spending now that they've controlled both houses of Congress
and the Presidency for the past five years. Somehow, I feel it must be
Clinton's fault, but I can't figure out exactly how.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blue Ribbon Coalition favors Forest Fee program Sportsmen Against Bush Fly Fishing 2 December 19th, 2003 08:48 PM
Ethics group files lawsuit over Forest Service outsourcing Sportsmen Against Bush Fly Fishing 1 December 6th, 2003 04:56 PM
Republicans, Bush support 85$ national forest use fee Bill Carson Fly Fishing 1 November 12th, 2003 03:19 PM
Bush, congress ok wilderness reduction and new roads through national parks mike500 Fly Fishing 0 October 29th, 2003 08:43 PM
Bush's war on the national forests - In support of the Landless Tlingits from Alaska's National Forest Tongass :-) John Elliott Fly Fishing 2 September 30th, 2003 02:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.