A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questions on Redington CT (click and pawl) reel



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 31st, 2003, 04:46 PM
rw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions on Redington CT (click and pawl) reel

Charlie Choc wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:22:50 -0800, rw
wrote:



It's actually more of an aesthetic thing, I guess. I don't like that big
wad of mono on my leader,



Try tying a small perfection loop instead of a bow. g


No matter how small you tie your loop, there's going to be a section of
doubled-up mono.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

  #22  
Old October 31st, 2003, 04:57 PM
Tim J.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions on Redington CT (click and pawl) reel


"Scott Seidman" wrote...
rw wrote:
Charlie Choc wrote:
rw wrote:

It's actually more of an aesthetic thing, I guess. I don't like that
big wad of mono on my leader,


Try tying a small perfection loop instead of a bow. g


No matter how small you tie your loop, there's going to be a section
of doubled-up mono.


That doubled up mono is right on top of your fly line, at least if you're
using a braided connector. It's only slightly less stealthy than the
flyline itself. Your fly is nine feet away from that, or maybe even 12 if
the situation merits that.

I can think of plenty of reasons why I don't catch fish, and insufficient
stealth is probably one of them, but I haven't gotten around to blaming my
leader loop for it.


Stealth, to me, is recovering the fly without shaking the tree too much.
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj


  #23  
Old October 31st, 2003, 05:04 PM
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions on Redington CT (click and pawl) reel


"Tim J." wrote in message
...

Stealth, to me, is recovering the fly without shaking the tree too

much.

Bobbing back to the surface with a minimum of disturbance and drying
without being detected by fishing companions.

Wolfgang
not as easy as it sounds.


  #25  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 08:10 AM
Brimbum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions on Redington CT (click and pawl) reel

chuck wrote:snip Interesting. So you actually add your loop-to-loop at the
tippet
end? Wouldn't that be more prone to picking up vegetation than a
surgeon's knot connection? I've been using a three-turn surgeon for
tippets and the perfection loop on the leader and mono butt.


Everything picks up vegatation around here. I didn't say i enjoyed doing ith
loop-to-loop at the tippet, it just jeeps me from shortening the main part of
the leader more. The only way I have found to keep that loop-to-loop from
looking too fragile is to stick to 3x for tippet. Now I know a bunch of the
trout guys will have strokes for me saying this, but the bluegill and bass
don't seem to care.

Big Dale
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.