OT Are you on the list ?

Tom Gibson wrote:

I could have guessed that you would be an anti-gun kind of guy. ...

Yeah, you could have, but you'd be wrong. I own several guns myself,
and I'm a card-carrying member of Pheasants Unlimited, but I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
... Pheasants Unlimited ...

DOH ! Pheasants Forever.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
.com...
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
... Pheasants Unlimited ...

DOH ! Pheasants Forever.

--
Ken Fortenberry


Op --a card-carryin' member of Peasants Unlimited--

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
.com...
Tom Gibson wrote:

I could have guessed that you would be an anti-gun kind of guy. ...

Yeah, you could have, but you'd be wrong. I own several guns myself,
and I'm a card-carrying member of Pheasants Unlimited, but I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.


When we going hunting? I've got a virgin AYA side by side just begging to be
shot.

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
...

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
.com...
Tom Gibson wrote:

I could have guessed that you would be an anti-gun kind of guy. ...

Yeah, you could have, but you'd be wrong. I own several guns myself,
and I'm a card-carrying member of Pheasants Unlimited, but I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.


When we going hunting? I've got a virgin AYA side by side just begging to
be
shot.

Call that hunting?! Hell, just set the damned thing on the floor, pull out
the Glock, and shoot it!

Wolfgang
now, if someone were to hide it out in the cornfield........

In article ,
says...

"Wayne Knight" wrote in message

When we going hunting? I've got a virgin AYA side by side just begging to
be
shot.

Call that hunting?! Hell, just set the damned thing on the floor, pull out
the Glock, and shoot it!

Wolfgang
now, if someone were to hide it out in the cornfield........


Well, if Wayne ships the AyA to me, I promise that I will hide
it where none of y'all will ever find it.

Kevin

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
.com...
Tom Gibson wrote:

I could have guessed that you would be an anti-gun kind of guy. ...

Yeah, you could have, but you'd be wrong. I own several guns myself,
and I'm a card-carrying member of Pheasants Unlimited, but I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.


I've never needed an uzi to kill pheasants, nor for any hunting for that
matter, but that's not the point of the Second Amendment, is it Kenny? In
fact, I'm pretty sure the Constitution doesn't guarantee my right to hunt of
fish. But it does guarantee me my right to protect myself from a tyrannical
government, and it does allow me to be 'well-armed'. Luckily, we've not yet
needed to actually express this right, regardless of what you whackos on the
Right thought about Clinton and what you other whackos on the Left think
about Bush. Neither could be considered 'tyrannical'; but simply our young
country has been somewhat of a historical anomaly, hasn't it? We could
easily get into the definition of 'well-armed' if you like as well, but I
suspect that even a fully automatic rifle is kinda like bringing a knife to
a gun fight when compared to the military's access to Abrams tanks, A10's,
nuclear missiles, and the like.

You know, Kenny, I've not seen much posted from you but asshole comments to
people and OT posts. Clearly your only value to this group is that of
functioning as the Village Idiot.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Tim Carter wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
... I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.

I've never needed an uzi to kill pheasants, nor for any hunting for that
matter, but that's not the point of the Second Amendment, is it Kenny? ...

If you want to shoot at people you need to join a well-regulated militia.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
.com...
Tim Carter wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
... I've never
needed an Uzi to kill a pheasant and neither do you.

I've never needed an uzi to kill pheasants, nor for any hunting for that
matter, but that's not the point of the Second Amendment, is it Kenny?
....

If you want to shoot at people you need to join a well-regulated militia.

Well, if and when the horrible time comes that I would want to shoot people,
I probably would join a militia, as should all Americans with any strength
and courage -- just as our forefathers did. Unfortunately, the laws you
condone would hamstring my efforts to protect my family, my way of life and
this country. With friends like that....


--
Ken Fortenberry

"Tim Carter" wrote in message
...



I've never needed an uzi to kill pheasants, nor for any hunting for that
matter, but that's not the point of the Second Amendment, is it Kenny? In
fact, I'm pretty sure the Constitution doesn't guarantee my right to hunt
of
fish. But it does guarantee me my right to protect myself from a
tyrannical
government, and it does allow me to be 'well-armed'. Luckily, we've not
yet
needed to actually express this right, regardless of what you whackos on
the
Right thought about Clinton and what you other whackos on the Left think
about Bush. Neither could be considered 'tyrannical'; but simply our
young
country has been somewhat of a historical anomaly, hasn't it? We could
easily get into the definition of 'well-armed' if you like as well, but I
suspect that even a fully automatic rifle is kinda like bringing a knife
to
a gun fight when compared to the military's access to Abrams tanks, A10's,
nuclear missiles, and the like.

You know, Kenny, I've not seen much posted from you but asshole comments
to
people and OT posts. Clearly your only value to this group is that of
functioning as the Village Idiot.


I wasn't aware that any legal body, at any level, has managed to determine
precisely what the 2nd amendment intended. And for that matter, I'm quite
certain the words "well-armed" are not in there. So don't be so quick to
brush off the validity of the debate.

--riverman