![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Connor wrote:
Sorry, perhaps I did not make that clear enough. There is no difference between DT and WF lines of the same rating. A WF line one rating higher than the DT is of course heavier than the DT. snip In other words, the rod-loading characteristics of a DT and a WF line (of "standard" tapers, whatever those are) at short range will be exactly the same, and any argument or rule-of-thumb one should go "up one weight" when using a WF line is bogus, at least for short range. I used to use DT lines for ordinary trout fishing, but over the past couple of years I've switched to WF lines. One reason is that the economy of the DT lines isn't a big issue when I compare it to all my other fishing expenses. A more important reason is that I sometimes want to cast long distances. In fact, I frequently want to cast long distances when fishing lakes and when fishing larger rivers where I often can't wade very close to good lies. Sometimes, especially when the fishing is very hot -- to the point of getting boring -- I just like to cast a lot of line for the hell of it, and because I'm tired of wading, and because it's more challenging. A WF line is ideal, IMO, because it works well at all ranges. It's exactly the same as a DT at short range, it shoots better than a DT at long range, and the mid-range isn't messed up by some bulky line/running-line connection. It's better than a shooting head, for my purposes, because I really dislike that transition through the guides of the line/running-line connection. I suppose that connection could be made as smooth a silk, with enough time and effort, but I can't be bothered for the puny extra $30/year or so (at the most) that my WF lines cost me. The only disadvantage besides price, as far as I can tell, is that a WF won't roll cast AT LONG DISTANCES as well as a DT. Very little of my fishing involves long-distance roll casting. Furthermore, while a WF doesn't long-distance roll cost as well as a DT, it does roll cast better than a shooting head. Finally, to the specific subject of this thread, I think a WF line would be the best choice for a beginner. After he's learned the basics of casting at short range, which will be EXACTLY THE SAME as with a DT line, he can move on to hauling and double hauling and shooting. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike C writes:
I am aware that many people advise beginners to use WF lines, I have just never been able to figure out why. I rather suspect it is because there is more money to be earned on a WF line, and advertising is a very powerful force. I've always suspected the same, due to the fact that a well cared for DT will last me 6 years of pretty heavy fishing, while a WF only gets 3. The economics for the line manufacturers seems to dictate the marketing strategy. For normal stream fishing, I have never seen where a WF line conveyed any advantage, even on some of the larger streams I fish. Admittedly, I mainly fish for trout and smallmouth bass in streams from 10-100 feet wide, so my practice wouldn't dictate anyone elses choice. What you need to do is go fishing and enjoy yourself, that is really what fishing is all about. And that is the best advice of all! Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Connor" wrote in message
Fly-shops are there to sell you things. Some will give you first class advice, and yet others will merely try to sell you something. The only way to make sure you get what you really need, is to inform yourself as well as you possibly can. I certainly agree, but I'll add that some shop owners take a short term outlook while some (the smarter ones, I think) take the long view. As a newbie, I put myself at the mercy of a fly shop owner for advice. I went in, with a limited budget and asked what I needed. Joe could not have been more helpful or more honest. Now, more than a decade later, I still do not doubt or disagree with the advice he gave me or the products he sold me that day. Consequently, I remain a loyal customer; and he has more than recouped what he could have taken from me that first day. Joe F. p.s. He recommended a DT line. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
Backing advice | Aaron Hammer | Fly Fishing | 13 | January 30th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Line Snobs | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 15 | January 3rd, 2004 02:49 PM |
Good deal on great line! | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 25th, 2003 05:08 AM |
PowerPro line | Eric | Bass Fishing | 2 | September 23rd, 2003 06:10 PM |