![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look at his line. Rich is probably using 4lb or 6lb test. The small hook is
a tell on this as well. You don't do an eye popping set with that size line. I landed a 42" muskie on Crow Lake a few years ago that was hooked not much better. Of course I was using 8lb test on a medium baitcaster fishing for Lakers on the reefs. Heavier tackle and I am sure I would have horsed the hook out. Joe Z. "Lure builder" wrote in message ... my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the bait missing, sorry that was two questions, i find it also hard to believe that the fish was landed with that hookset. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lure wrote:
my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the bait missing, Drop shot fishing, nose hooked plastics are often lost when the fish jumps. Sometimes you catch 8 or 9 fish without losing the plastic. And sometimes you lose it on the first fish. But almost all of them float right up and are re-usable if you are of a mind to retrieve them. Just bite off the torn nose of the bait and re-rig it. Don't recall which of the various small plastics that fish was caught on. I use them kind of interchangeably when drop shotting. RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Anyone who has a hard time beleiving that fish was caught with that hook don't fish much or don't catch many fish. I wacky rig a lot, and I use 1/0 or 2/0 octopus hooks. They are small hooks, but bigger hooks alter the fall(action of the lure) IMO, I love the smaller hooks, almost 90% of the time my fish are going no where on a wacky rig hook, but every now and then I get one that is skin tagged like the fish in the picture, I have noticed it happens more when the fish is running towards me prior to the hook set. That is usually when I miss most fish also "RichZ" wrote in message ... Lure wrote: my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the bait missing, Drop shot fishing, nose hooked plastics are often lost when the fish jumps. Sometimes you catch 8 or 9 fish without losing the plastic. And sometimes you lose it on the first fish. But almost all of them float right up and are re-usable if you are of a mind to retrieve them. Just bite off the torn nose of the bait and re-rig it. Don't recall which of the various small plastics that fish was caught on. I use them kind of interchangeably when drop shotting. RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Anyone who has a hard time beleiving that fish was caught with that hook don't fish much or don't catch many fish. I wacky rig a lot, and I use 1/0 or 2/0 octopus hooks. They are small hooks, but bigger hooks alter the fall(action of the lure) IMO, I love the smaller hooks, almost 90% of the time my fish are going no where on a wacky rig hook, but every now and then I get one that is skin tagged like the fish in the picture, I have noticed it happens more when the fish is running towards me prior to the hook set. That is usually when I miss most fish also "RichZ" wrote in message ... Lure wrote: my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the bait missing, Drop shot fishing, nose hooked plastics are often lost when the fish jumps. Sometimes you catch 8 or 9 fish without losing the plastic. And sometimes you lose it on the first fish. But almost all of them float right up and are re-usable if you are of a mind to retrieve them. Just bite off the torn nose of the bait and re-rig it. Don't recall which of the various small plastics that fish was caught on. I use them kind of interchangeably when drop shotting. RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Rich
That is as thin of a hook position as I have seen. You must be living right to get that bass to the boat. I generally read your posts with great interest and have learned a bunch. We differ on circle hooks. Beaked hooks work great.....I use gammy size 1 and get great results with a sweep hookset and firm pressure for abut 10 secs to be sure I have a solid set. The biggest reason I lose bass( I think) is when they tail grab a nose hooked bait. I also use 15 lb test floro as a leader for my 14 lb test fireline. One point we agree on is that the smaller circle hooks can hook a skinny piece of the basses mouth. That has caused me to move to larger sizes. I am guessing that the pic was a drop shot bass. I have very little experience with drop shotting. Do you always use such a small hook? Steve "RichZ" wrote in message ... Because too often, they grab the tiniest bite before the beak leads the point back out of the skin/meat whatever, and you end up with a very precariously hooked fish. Of course this photo could also be used to illustrate why I NEVER use multiple hooksets. No way you know if the first set it something like this, in which case the 2nd set is 99% sure to just rip it free. http://www.richz.com/fishing/images/no_beaks_for_me.jpg RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the
bait missing, sorry that was two questions, i find it also hard to believe that the fish was landed with that hookset. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look at his line. Rich is probably using 4lb or 6lb test. The small hook is
a tell on this as well. You don't do an eye popping set with that size line. I landed a 42" muskie on Crow Lake a few years ago that was hooked not much better. Of course I was using 8lb test on a medium baitcaster fishing for Lakers on the reefs. Heavier tackle and I am sure I would have horsed the hook out. Joe Z. "Lure builder" wrote in message ... my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the bait missing, sorry that was two questions, i find it also hard to believe that the fish was landed with that hookset. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my question is what bait was on that small hook and why in the picture is the
bait missing, sorry that was two questions, i find it also hard to believe that the fish was landed with that hookset. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Rich
That is as thin of a hook position as I have seen. You must be living right to get that bass to the boat. I generally read your posts with great interest and have learned a bunch. We differ on circle hooks. Beaked hooks work great.....I use gammy size 1 and get great results with a sweep hookset and firm pressure for abut 10 secs to be sure I have a solid set. The biggest reason I lose bass( I think) is when they tail grab a nose hooked bait. I also use 15 lb test floro as a leader for my 14 lb test fireline. One point we agree on is that the smaller circle hooks can hook a skinny piece of the basses mouth. That has caused me to move to larger sizes. I am guessing that the pic was a drop shot bass. I have very little experience with drop shotting. Do you always use such a small hook? Steve "RichZ" wrote in message ... Because too often, they grab the tiniest bite before the beak leads the point back out of the skin/meat whatever, and you end up with a very precariously hooked fish. Of course this photo could also be used to illustrate why I NEVER use multiple hooksets. No way you know if the first set it something like this, in which case the 2nd set is 99% sure to just rip it free. http://www.richz.com/fishing/images/no_beaks_for_me.jpg RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fishing Hooks | Bill Kiene | Fly Fishing | 23 | June 30th, 2011 01:24 AM |
Magnetic hooks | vincent p. norris | Fly Fishing Tying | 11 | March 18th, 2004 06:40 AM |
Rusting hooks | SHRED© | Bass Fishing | 4 | March 9th, 2004 12:00 AM |
Gamakatsu Fly Tying Hooks - Opinion | Cornmuse | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | February 20th, 2004 04:08 AM |
hooks? | Rodney | General Discussion | 0 | October 22nd, 2003 07:22 PM |