Cheney's new fishing companion

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:46 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

Better known (because more accurately) as an uneducated murderous
pig......with a bad perm.

Murderous pig. Wow. Bad perm? You haven't seen my hair in a number
of years, Straight as a board. Cancer and old age will do that to
you.

A good dose of napalm would take care of all of that.

At least I kept my nickels at the playground when I was a kid,
Napoleon. d;o) You got pushed around and pushed around, your nickels
taken,

Sure, if you say so.

probably corn-holed, maybe even had to suck a dick or two. No
wonder you are such a bitter little shrimp. That had to have been a
terrible burden as a shrimpy child. I imagine adulthood as a shrimpy
child is even worse. No wonder you attract homely women. Probably
wanna cuddle da little boy and soothe all his pains.

Ooh! Ooh! Hardball!

Wolfgang
who knows when he's been slammed good and proper.

By the way, why do you supposed it is that you and kennie and stevie and
mikie......and dicklet (hee, hee, hee).....are so possessed by homoerotic
imagery?

Wolfgang

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:37:48 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

possessed by homoerotic
imagery?

Possessed? Homoerotic imagery? You seem to be the one that brought
up that subject. Remind you of your old playground days? Eh?

Davey, aka the Pirate, Dog, Murderous Pig, Doctor.........

On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote:
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts.

This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the
nation's annual income:

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be
judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance"
run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with
some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing
more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton
happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good
economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do
with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps. You
don't really believe the dot-com bubble was anything more than an
inevitably bursting bubble, do you?

Oh, and I do agree that there's hardly such a thing as an economically
conservative Republican anymore, and that both parties are addicted to
feeding at the trough. Interestingly enough, John McCain is a zero-
pork guy; I respect that. I also agree with Scott -- if the Dems
really were strongly against what is happening, they could do
something, even shut down the government if they wanted.

Jon.

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:37:48 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

possessed by homoerotic
imagery?

Possessed?

Yes.

Homoerotic imagery?

Uh huh.

You seem to be the one that brought
up that subject.

I do? Hm...... O.k., why don't you go ahead and show us a relevant
quote?

Remind you of your old playground days? Eh?

My playground days were spent doing what kids do on playgrounds. You really
think your fantasies are going to convince anyone?

Davey, aka the Pirate, Dog, Murderous Pig, Doctor.........

Imbecile.

Wolfgang

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...


Possessed?

Yes.

Homoerotic imagery?

Uh huh.

You seem to be the one that brought
up that subject.

I do? Hm...... O.k., why don't you go ahead and show us a relevant
quote?

No?

Well, gosh, ain't we all surprised?

Now, where were we?

Hm.......

Oh yes......why do you supposed it is that you and kennie and stevie and
mikie......and dicklet (hee, hee, hee).....are so possessed by homoerotic
imagery?

Wolfgang

wrote:
On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote:

You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts.

This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the
nation's annual income:

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html


Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be
judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance"
run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with
some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing
more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton
happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good
economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do
with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps.

So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the
Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the
economy?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

wrote:
... Interestingly enough, John McCain is a zero-
pork guy; I respect that.

I think it's silly. If one of my Senators climbed up on a
high horse and declared that the rules of the game suck so
on behalf of my constituents in Illinois I'm going to forfeit
the game I'd fire the dumb sumbitch.

I also agree with Scott -- if the Dems
really were strongly against what is happening, they could do
something, even shut down the government if they wanted.

Sure, the Dems could commit political suicide if they wanted
to, but why on earth would they want to ? Better to let the
clock run out on Shrub and the current Congress then do better
next time.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"rw" wrote in message
news
wrote:
On Apr 14, 6:43 am, rw wrote:

You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts.

This web site shows a graph of the national debt as a percentage of the
nation's annual income:

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html


Big deal. It's short term. If history is fair, Greenspan will be
judged for allowing two very large periods of "irrational exuberance"
run out of control. Although the first (the dot com bubble) left with
some pain, the second one (the housing market) will end up causing
more long-term pain, and perhaps severe pain, IMO. That Clinton
happened to get in and get out at opportune times, and look good
economically for doing so, was purely accidental and had nothing to do
with any actual policy differences between the Dems and Reps.

So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the
Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the
economy?

It doesn't.

On the other hand, it DOES cause the proliferation of Ponderosa pine......at
moderate elevations.

Wolfgang
who figures, what the hell, it CAN'T hurt to inject a bit of sense into yet
another twitfest.....right?

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
wrote:
... Interestingly enough, John McCain is a zero-
pork guy; I respect that.

I think it's silly. If one of my Senators climbed up on a
high horse and declared that the rules of the game suck so
on behalf of my constituents in Illinois I'm going to forfeit
the game I'd fire the dumb sumbitch.

Hm......which way doth the wind blow today?

I also agree with Scott -- if the Dems
really were strongly against what is happening, they could do
something, even shut down the government if they wanted.

Sure, the Dems could commit political suicide if they wanted
to, but why on earth would they want to ?

Well, it really isn't so much a matter of want. I mean, why would a blind
man WANT to step off the cliff of whose presence he is entirely oblivious?

Better to let the
clock run out on Shrub and the current Congress then do better
next time.

And we're all counting on you to do it.

Wolfgang
seriously, you boys are a riot.

On Apr 14, 12:23 pm, rw wrote:

So you don't believe that the differences between the Democrats and the
Republicans regarding, for example, tax rates make any difference to the
economy?

The things they quibble over? Nope.

Jon.