Being constent

On Dec 25, 12:55*pm, Larry L wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:50*am, sandy wrote:



I'm beginning to think this kind of stubborn
resistance to needed change is a genetic condition. Rational
evaluation of the evidence just doesn't support this kind
of boneheaded behavior.

Good to 'see' ya, Sandy G

There is evidence that "conservative" IS a genetic condition ...

I'm too lazy to search for the links on X-mas but I've read several
interesting studies. * One has shown that people that call themselves
'conservative' have THREE TIMES the brain activity in areas associated
with fear as others, when shown exactly the same images or other
stimulation !! * * Another study *has followed individuals for years
and indicates that it is possible to predict adult political leanings
by observing youngsters and their interactions ... those 'destined' to
conservative politics tend to be much less outgoing and, again, far
more prone to fear, as children.

Apparently, when 'they' engage in fear mongering, it's NOT just a
political game ... they really are afraid and know their constituents
really are too. * Change IS often scary, is it not? * It's probably
far more so to them.

Although, I've seen no studies to support this observations, I
personally, have also reached the conclusion that weak mental
abilities in the areas of 'empathy' and 'imagination' are strongly
connected to politically 'conservative' individuals. * *I first
noticed this many years ago in a discussion with a stongly
conservative friend. * He simply was incapable of using his
imagination and mentally inserting himself into the shoes of
others, ... and it did appear to be lack of ability in those skills,
not any lack of effort, or lack of 'intelligence'. * Since that
conversation, I've noticed the same weaknesses in many 'right wing'
people I've met.

It often seems conservatives simply aren't capable of visualizing a
future that is both different and better. * * Maybe their brains
really are that limited and they really can't. * *Maybe we should see
them as handicapped more than as simply self-serving boneheads, ....
maybe it would be fairer to them and make communicating with them
easier.

In point of fact, the problems that beset America (and other places as
well, I suppose) today have much less to do with whether people
identify themselves, or one another, as conservatives or liberals,
than with the fact that not one in a thousand can be relied upon to
demonstrate that either term has any relevant meaning at all......let
alone what that meaning might be.

But then, you're not one of the multitude......right?

Go ahead.....try it.

g.

On Dec 25, 2:16*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
With the Nation in economic distress and unemployment above 10% , the
Democrats in the House Of Representatives and, now a Senate,
Committee, without even knowing the content blundered thru Obama's
"Cap and Tax Bill". Legislation that could well topple our economy
into a depression. Pure fiscal insanity. For the Kool-aid addicts who
believed Obama when he said that he would give a tax break to 95% of
Americans, hold on to you wallets and prepare for the largest single
regressive tax increase in American history. This "Global Warming"
fraud will prove to be the biggest jobs killer ever conceived; and,
simply ship millions of America jobs overseas to countries such as
China and India. The next time you hear the ranting of an Obamanite,
ask them why there is "NO" statistical correlation between atmospheric
CO2 levels and global temperatures (the latter which actually have
slightly decreased over the last decade) -and- why the temperature
trend lines on Mars tracks identically with that on earth. ((Hint: the
Sun is the only common denominator.)) In brief: global temperature
variations correlate precisely with Solar activity. As for the
sustained hype over Ice Cap melting and sea level rise, Ice core
drilling in the fast ice off Davis Station in East Antarctica shows
that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest
in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s
is 1.67m. To emphasize the importance of these statistics, Antarctica
contains 90% of the world's ice pack. Now you know why the inventor of
the internet, Albert Gore, refuses to debate the issue. "If" the
Global Warming enthusiasts were sincere in their intent to reduce
manmade CO2 emissions, which constitute less than 0.00022 percent of
the total naturally emitted from the earth s mantle, they would be
actively promoting the significantly expanded use of Nuclear Power for
America's electrical energy generation. An endeavor intended not only
to rerduce CO2, which constitutes only about 0.037% of total
atmosphere gases ; but, as well, to dramatically reduce our dependence
on imported energy resources; and, to provide a distributed grid with
dormant interconnectivity. The logic in this dilemma is exceedingly
transparent, our Dictatorial Marxist, Barack Obama, simply wants more
control over your activities and lifestyle; and, the health of the
American economy be dammed. It's essential that we clean house in the
upcoming elections.

Moron.

g.

On Dec 25, 7:35*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
The announcement by Alabama Rep. Parker Griffith that he is switching
to the Republican Party is just the latest warning sign that the
Democratic Party -- my lifelong political home -- has a critical
decision to make: Either we plot a more moderate, centrist course or
risk electoral disaster not just in the upcoming midterms but in many
elections to come.

Rep. Griffith's decision makes him the fifth centrist Democrat to
either switch parties or announce plans to retire rather than stand
for reelection in 2010. These announcements are a sharp reversal from
the progress the Democratic Party made starting in 2006 and continuing
in 2008, when it reestablished itself as the nation's majority party
for the first time in more than a decade. That success happened for
one major reason: Democrats made inroads in geographies and
constituencies that had trended Republican since the 1960s. In these
two elections, a majority of independents and a sizable number of
moderate Republicans joined the traditional
here is more for ya clowns......

Democratic base to sweep Democrats to commanding majorities in
Congress and to bring Barack Obama to the White House.

These independents and Republicans supported Democrats based on a
message indicating that the party would be a true Big Tent -- that we
would welcome a diversity of views even on tough issues such as
abortion, gun rights and the role of government in the economy.

This call was answered not just by voters but by a surge of smart,
talented candidates who came forward to run and win under the
Democratic banner in districts dominated by Republicans for a
generation. These centrists swelled the party's ranks in Congress and
contributed to Obama's victories in states such as Indiana, North
Carolina, Virginia, Colorado and other Republican bastions.

But now they face a grim political fate. On the one hand, centrist
Democrats are being vilified by left-wing bloggers, pundits and
partisan news outlets for not being sufficiently liberal, "true"
Democrats. On the other, Republicans are pounding them for their
association with a party that seems to be advancing an agenda far to
the left of most voters.

The political dangers of this situation could not be clearer.

Imbecile.

On Dec 25, 7:42*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Yale most memorable quotes of 2009:#1 Keep your government hands off
my medicare. After citizens discovered the Obama plan to cut
$550,000,000 from medicare.#4 You Lie! Wilson after repeated Obama
lies on Health Care during address to Joint Session.#5 The Cambridge
Police Acted Stupidly! When Major Hasan killed 13 people, Obama held a
press conference at the White House urging everyone to “not make any
rush to judgments.”

With all the evidence about Hasan coming to light and even though the
majority of Americans recognized this as a terrorist attack, Obama
stood up in front of thousands of military personnel and insulted
their intelligence, did he mention the word “terrorist.” Instead,
Obama blamed what happened at Fort Hood on “cynicism and divisiveness”
and the stress of multiple deployments.

There’s something very unique in this entire situation that the state-
run media has completely neglected: how Obama has reacted to various
situations that have arisen during his time in office.

Let’s go back to May of this year. On May 31, an anti-abortion
extremist named Scott Roeder gunned down Dr. George Tiller, an
abortion doctor. Almost immediately, Obama released a statement saying
he was “shocked and outraged” by Tiller’s murder.

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, immediately stationed U.S.
Marshals at abortion clinics across the country.

A day later, on June 1, the first terrorist attack in Little Rock,
Ark. was committed under Obama’s watch. Pfc. William Long, 23, and
Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula, 18, were shot by a man named Abdulhakim
Mujahid Muhammad.

Obama’s reaction to this was more emotionally toned down. He did not
issue any remarks until a couple days later, when he claimed he was
“deeply saddened.” There were no U.S. Marshals stationed at recruiting
centers, as there were at abortion clinics.

Fast forward to July 26. Police in Cambridge, Mass. arrested professor
Henry-Lewis Gates, an African-American professor, for disorderly
conduct and disturbing the peace.

At a press conference on health care a day later, a reporter asked
Obama about his opinion on the incident. Obama said,“I don’t know all
the facts…but I think the police acted stupidly.”

In perhaps the only truthful thing Obama has ever said since becoming
president, he acknowledged he didn’t have all the facts. But he was
quick to pass judgment on white police officers arresting a black man.

This is also because Obama disdains our military. As a senator, he
voted to cut off vital funding to our troops fighting in Iraq and
Afghanistan and voted against the troop surge in Iraq. He is now in
command of the same troops he voted to betray.

As commander-in-chief, he proclaimed that the idea of victory in
Afghanistan makes him uncomfortable and,for nearly three months,
dragged his feet on deciding whether to send more troops to
Afghanistan.

Idiot.

g.

On Dec 26, 8:39*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Because he sympathizes with them. He thinks America is a bad country
that has abused the rest of the world, made them do our bidding,
bullied them, and stole their resources. Obama hates America; just
like his buddy Bill Ayers the SDS bomber and Jeremiah Wright do. That
is why Obama is always overseas apologizing for our "bad" country.
Americans elected a president who DOES NOT believe in the essential
goodness of America! We will come to regret that.

On Dec 26, 8:39*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
Because he sympathizes with them. He thinks America is a bad country
that has abused the rest of the world, made them do our bidding,
bullied them, and stole their resources. Obama hates America; just
like his buddy Bill Ayers the SDS bomber and Jeremiah Wright do. That
is why Obama is always overseas apologizing for our "bad" country.
Americans elected a president who DOES NOT believe in the essential
goodness of America! We will come to regret that.

Cretin.

g.

"MajorOz" wrote in message
...
.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
Tom

On Dec 27, 5:56*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"MajorOz" wrote in message

...

.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

....heh, heh, heh............that absolutely boggles the mind.
Although I would expect that Mozart would respect and appreciate the
music of BW.

cheers

oz.........as Strauss would have appreciated Kubric's treatment in
_2001_.

On Dec 27, 1:08*pm, MajorOz wrote:
On Dec 27, 5:56*am, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

"MajorOz" wrote in message

....

.......I actually love Mozart and Bob Wills...........

and, that album they did together was fabulous!g
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Tom

...heh, heh, heh............that absolutely boggles the mind.
Although I would expect that Mozart would respect and appreciate the
music of BW.

cheers

oz.........as Strauss would have appreciated Kubric's treatment in
_2001_.

And they would all beat beancounter in tic tac toe.
Frank Reid