![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Russell" wrote in message ... Wolfgang wrote: "rw" wrote in message m... ...I prefer a flyline/leader connection that slips easily through the guides, Leader link I like Leader Links as well, but I have had them break before. I've only had them break on one side to I didn't lose my leader or fly but it did require me to replace the Leader Link. We've seen several reports of breakage here over the last few years. Like you, I've had one break on one side, but never completely. I fished the half broken one for several weeks before replacing it. I don't remember for sure, but I suspect this one was very old. I've got three or four reels strung up with various lines for my 7 wt. All of the lines and leader links on these are at least ten years old. No problems. Wolfgang |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.flyanglersonline.com/
SA has a new L2L system on the market. I will be part of a field test group. If you're interested, contact me offlist. -- Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69 Drowning flies to Dark Star http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to admit I have never considered a Leader Link. I think Ernie
Harrison uses them and I found this article that seemed pretty informative: http://www.hotspotfishing.com/public...s/fish-254.asp Chris 'padishar creel' Fanning "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "rw" wrote in message m... ...I prefer a flyline/leader connection that slips easily through the guides, Leader link presents the least possible wind resistance, Leader link. turns over the leader, Leader link. and lands quietly on the water. Leader link. If I want to change leaders... Leader link. Wolfgang some debates, while easy enough to follow, are nevertheless impossible to understand. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Padishar Creel" wrote in message ... I have to admit I have never considered a Leader Link. Try it. You'll like it. Wolfgang |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Padishar Creel wrote:
I have to admit I have never considered a Leader Link. I think Ernie Harrison uses them and I found this article that seemed pretty informative: I use them, too, and I think they work well, but I'm not dogmatic about them. A nail knot works just as well. A needle knot is even better. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang wrote:
["no-knot" eyelets] Don't know about any formal tests done with them, but there are a several problems. In the first place, they are a bit of a pain in the ass to get into the end of the fly line. They are made of steel.....that makes them heavy. As small as they are, they will sink the end of the fly line. You still have to knot the leader to the eye. This necessarily means the leader is tied to a surface perpendicular to its own length.....a more or less perfect hinge. Being made of steel, they WILL rust. This results in a pitted surface that saws through the leader knot pretty efficiently as it hinges. They rely on barbs, much like those on hooks, to remain fastened to the line. The barbs have fairly sharp edges which eventually cut the line. I've tried them myself and know a number of others who have also. I don't know anyone who has used them for long. I remember when I first started flyfishing back in the early 80's, I tried them thinking that it would be nice to be able to avoid tying nailknots, etc. (funny how things never really change). They were horrible. Worst of all was the hinging you describe above, as the knot would swivel at the tie-point with each false cast. And I don't know if it was just my lack of knot-tying skills, but I remember it simply being a pain to knot the leader to the eye. When I picked up the sport again I found a few of them sitting at the bottom of a box with my old tackle. Even twenty years later the image of trying to use the things was fresh. Since getting back into it again, I mostly played around with nailknots and loop-to-loop connections, but after reading various threads about leader links, I finally decided to give them a try. And frankly, I haven't had any problems with them whatsoever, as long as I make sure to test the knots for slippage after they are inserted in the links. I assume they have a somewhat limited life and could distort or crack over time, but it's easy enough to replace them every so often to avoid that. I know it's not considered the "proper" connection by some, but aside from aesthetics, I can't really think of any reason not to use them. I'll use a nailknot for attaching backing to line, but now I rarely bother with it for line to leader connections. Chuck Vance (just call me lazy) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Charlie Wilson wrote: "Ken Fortenberry" wrote: I think that's both bad advice and misinformation. I've seen braided loops pull off and a fly line will break long before a well tied nail knot will fail. I agree. I have never had a nail knot fail, and properly tied, you won't even feel it going through the guides. On *most* new fly lines, I use a nail knot to tie on a butt section of red Amnesia mono (I think it's about 25 lb test). I use a barrel knot to tie the leader to the Amnesia; so whenever I need to tie on a new leader, the butt section (and not the fly line) loses a half inch. That's what I do too (except for the red Amnesia). The butts section lasts at least a season even with alot of fishing. Willi |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Granted Skip is talking about a 4 weight and the braided loop is probably fine for that application, personally not my preference. If you are fishing for pike, steelhead, salmon, large species, I would suggest a nail knot connection... I know of a couple guys that fish pike allot and they went away from the braided loop after having pike jerk the loop off the fly line. I tried the braided loop when they came out and found the end of a floating line will sink. ymmv. JT There are two kinds of materials used for braids. The one commonly sold will sink, but there's also a floating version. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Svend Tang-Petersen" wrote in message ... Granted Skip is talking about a 4 weight and the braided loop is probably fine for that application, personally not my preference. If you are fishing for pike, steelhead, salmon, large species, I would suggest a nail knot connection... I know of a couple guys that fish pike allot and they went away from the braided loop after having pike jerk the loop off the fly line. I tried the braided loop when they came out and found the end of a floating line will sink. ymmv. JT There are two kinds of materials used for braids. The one commonly sold will sink, but there's also a floating version. The only braided loops that I have used are the braided loops that came with the Cortland fly lines I have used. Last year I purchased a floating 444 (peach, my favorite) and I can't remember if it came with a loop or not, so I don't know if they still send the loops with their lines? However, the floating Lazer Lines that I bought in the previous years had them and I had trouble with the tip of my Lazers sinking... I figured, Cortland would send the floating version with a floating line... Do you know if the loops sent with a floating Cortland Series fly line are the floating version? I must have a 1/2 dozen of them in my leader pouch, not sure why I have hung on to them? JT |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All of the sal****er fishermen that I have had contact with use the braided
loop with two nail knots close together towards the top of the braid. The braid below the lowest knot will hold like a chinese finger puzzle. This is important in lines that do not crush. Most trout lines are made using a woven core that is hollow and wil crush when a knot is drawn tight. the woven core does a great job of holding the plastic /PVC in place. Many sal****er lines are now made with a woven core that is not hollow or a mono solid core that will not crush. Neither is great at holding the plastic/PVC in place. IF you use a single nail knot and a mono loop, there is the possiblility that a large fish will just strip off all of the plastic/PVC below the knot. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Are you still wasting your time with spam?... There is a solution!" Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector The most powerful anti-spam software available. http://mail.spaminspector.com "Skip Summer" wrote in message om... Planning on using some mono to connect flyline to leader, using a nail knot. What pound test mono should I use? 4 weight flyline. This rod will be used for bluegills. Thanks in advance for the help. Skip |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lanyard question | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing | 14 | May 13th, 2004 02:36 PM |
Boat slip question | JackTr | Bass Fishing | 6 | February 2nd, 2004 04:52 PM |
Vintage Lure Question | Ross Mac | General Discussion | 2 | December 23rd, 2003 06:10 AM |
Hook Set on Top Waters - and a Question at the end. | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 4 | October 22nd, 2003 12:49 AM |
Tournament Question | Chuck Coger | Bass Fishing | 7 | October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM |