Trout behavior

Chester the Molester wrote:

... There's no real hurry, as hypocrisy knows no time limit.

Thanks Kenny, you're a real decent addict!

Comparing dope smoking to molesting our National Forests is
like comparing jaywalking to arson.

But you keep right on showing your ass, Chester. I couldn't
possibly do a better job of illustrating what a despicable
piece of filth you are than the job you insist on doing on
yourself.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Chester the Molester wrote:

... There's no real hurry, as hypocrisy knows no time limit.

Thanks Kenny, you're a real decent addict!

Comparing dope smoking to molesting our National Forests is
like comparing jaywalking to arson.

But you keep right on showing your ass, Chester. I couldn't
possibly do a better job of illustrating what a despicable
piece of filth you are than the job you insist on doing on
yourself.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:10:15 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


(snipped)

Wayne Harrison wrote:

the repitition of excess only softens its impact.

There's nothing excessive about referring to Chester the Molester
as a filthy piece of human garbage.

Perhaps you might want to change Molester to Despoiler? The molester
meanings in the dictionary and in public use all seem to refer to
unwanted sexual activity. I doubt he's been running around fondling
or having intercourse with protesting trees, bushes, or loam.
Despoiler is almost as derogatory a term, but lacks the (presumably
unwarranted) sexual connotations..
--

rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing.
Often taunted by trout.
Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

Kenny, you have been showin' your ignorance and hypocrisy for the past 5 or
6 years I've been here, do you really think (that's rhetorical, cause we all
know you don't) I could compete at your level of stupidity? No Kenny, you
don't have a clue. However, you make an excellent Fascist!

Who loves ya buddy,
Mark
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. ..
Chester the Molester wrote:

... There's no real hurry, as hypocrisy knows no time limit.

Thanks Kenny, you're a real decent addict!

Comparing dope smoking to molesting our National Forests is
like comparing jaywalking to arson.

But you keep right on showing your ass, Chester. I couldn't
possibly do a better job of illustrating what a despicable
piece of filth you are than the job you insist on doing on
yourself.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Kenny, you have been showin' your ignorance and hypocrisy for the past 5 or
6 years I've been here, do you really think (that's rhetorical, cause we all
know you don't) I could compete at your level of stupidity? No Kenny, you
don't have a clue. However, you make an excellent Fascist!

Who loves ya buddy,
Mark
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
. ..
Chester the Molester wrote:

... There's no real hurry, as hypocrisy knows no time limit.

Thanks Kenny, you're a real decent addict!

Comparing dope smoking to molesting our National Forests is
like comparing jaywalking to arson.

But you keep right on showing your ass, Chester. I couldn't
possibly do a better job of illustrating what a despicable
piece of filth you are than the job you insist on doing on
yourself.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Obviously Cyli, you have missed Kenny's intent. Child molester is exactly
what Kenny wants people to think. It's a Nazi propaganda tactic he learned
from his mentor J.G.

Mark
wrote in message
news
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:10:15 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


(snipped)

Wayne Harrison wrote:

the repitition of excess only softens its impact.

There's nothing excessive about referring to Chester the Molester
as a filthy piece of human garbage.

Perhaps you might want to change Molester to Despoiler? The molester
meanings in the dictionary and in public use all seem to refer to
unwanted sexual activity. I doubt he's been running around fondling
or having intercourse with protesting trees, bushes, or loam.
Despoiler is almost as derogatory a term, but lacks the (presumably
unwarranted) sexual connotations..
--

rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing.
Often taunted by trout.
Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely
on it.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

lid wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Wayne Harrison wrote:

the repitition of excess only softens its impact.

There's nothing excessive about referring to Chester the Molester
as a filthy piece of human garbage.

Perhaps you might want to change Molester to Despoiler? ...

No, I don't think so.

From Webster's:

1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or
injurious effect

So, besides being technically accurate, (Chetser the Molester *IS*
in fact a molester), he is worse than a child molester. A child
molester damages only those children in his sphere. Chester would
destroy the best legacy we could ever leave to many thousands of
children and he does it just for jollies.

Scum like Chester are persona non grata even among decent motorheads
who do their vroom, vroom thing legally and don't appreciate the
black eye given to their "pastime" by those who don't.

--
Ken Fortenberry

lid wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Wayne Harrison wrote:

the repitition of excess only softens its impact.

There's nothing excessive about referring to Chester the Molester
as a filthy piece of human garbage.

Perhaps you might want to change Molester to Despoiler? ...

No, I don't think so.

From Webster's:

1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or
injurious effect

So, besides being technically accurate, (Chetser the Molester *IS*
in fact a molester), he is worse than a child molester. A child
molester damages only those children in his sphere. Chester would
destroy the best legacy we could ever leave to many thousands of
children and he does it just for jollies.

Scum like Chester are persona non grata even among decent motorheads
who do their vroom, vroom thing legally and don't appreciate the
black eye given to their "pastime" by those who don't.

--
Ken Fortenberry

In article ,
lid says...
wrote:
lid says...
Chester the Molester wrote:
... Hell, I'll be 4-wheelin' it in the Pisgah again this weekend. ...

If you're doing it in those areas of the Pisgah where it's illegal
I hope you find a piano wire strung right at neck height. ...

Now now, he's got a point there. How are your illegal indulgences
that much better than his illegal indulgences?

Smoking dope should be legal, trashing our National Forests on an
ATV where they are illegal should be punishable by life in prison.
Either that or piano wire decapitation of illegal motorheads in our
National Forests should be classified as involuntary filth slaughter
and punishable by a $50 fine for the first three offenses and a $10
fine for each subsequent offense.

Eye of the beholder. I view them roughly equal. Both are illegal,
both are considered minor offenses. Actually, riding an ATV in the
woods is perfectly legal in many places, so in that regard it's not
all that hard a case to make that your illegal drug use is worse.
- Ken

wrote:

Eye of the beholder. I view them roughly equal. Both are illegal,
both are considered minor offenses. Actually, riding an ATV in the
woods is perfectly legal in many places, so in that regard it's not
all that hard a case to make that your illegal drug use is worse.
- Ken

You could make that case, and you have before, but like I told Chester
comparing dope smoking to illegal ATV joyriding on public lands is
like comparing jaywalking to arson. If smoking dope were legal it
wouldn't harm anyone but the person doing the smoking. If ATVs were
legal everywhere on our public lands they'd soon be trashed beyond
reclamation. Motorheads can trash private property to their muddy
little heart's content, (so long as a stream doesn't run through it),
but they have no place on our public lands. They're too destructive.

--
Ken Fortenberry