OT -- very thoughtful, imho

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:34:18 -0600, Warren wrote:

wrote...
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:59:46 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote:

in a conservative publication


http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html


My, does this sound familiar . . . .

Does any of this?

http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml

:-)

All of it sounds distressingly familiar. Even Saddam believed he had
gas and bio-weapons, however, none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:34:18 -0600, Warren wrote:

wrote...
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:59:46 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote:

in a conservative publication


http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html


My, does this sound familiar . . . .

Does any of this?

http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml

:-)

All of it sounds distressingly familiar. Even Saddam believed he had
gas and bio-weapons, however, none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better
model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-)

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better
model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-)

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better
model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-)

see my other reply

For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as
well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a
humanitarian cause.

Peter

turn mailhot into hotmail to reply

Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:41:23 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better
model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-)

see my other reply

For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as
well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a
humanitarian cause.

Yeah, taking out Saddam "al Schweitzer" Hussein was a blow to humanitarian
causes everywhere...

R

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:41:23 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:29:47 GMT, Bones wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:19:19 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:

none of those politicians quoted by
Glenn Beck (is he one of those whack-job radio talk show hosts?) would
have gone to war in the manner of the current administration. Therein
lies the difference.

That is exactly correct... I guess Serbia would have been a better
model......you know, U.N. backing and all :-)

see my other reply

For the record, I thought the Kosovo intervention was wrong-headed as
well. At least the motivations for it had some grounding in a
humanitarian cause.

Yeah, taking out Saddam "al Schweitzer" Hussein was a blow to humanitarian
causes everywhere...

R

wrote in message
...
Ok, where are you big ol' queens registered? I'd feel like a real heel
not
sending something to the wedding...lessee...a DVD of La Cage?...naw, y'all
both
probably have copies...a weekend getaway at Fire Island?...naw, no point
in
subjecting a couple of cracker packers to that kind of ridicule...AHA! A
great
big bucket of kosher pickles, a dozen foot-long Hebrew Nationals, and a
crate of
KY! The perfect gift for you two lovebirds!

Congrats, you big silly jabbering loonies, you,
Pug or Kug or Dickie or whatever

Dear Pug Knuckler
Come on Pug, you can answer the question. Are you making money off this war?
Its a very simple question.

A little or a lot? Fat cost plus contract, or just the usual? Normal
kickback or just a campaign contribution thru a fictitious cutout? Or even
an "honest (for Haliburton at least) competitive" deal among friends? Lets
hear from someone in the know. How about it Pug? You cashing in on this War
thingy?

Dave

wrote in message
...
Ok, where are you big ol' queens registered? I'd feel like a real heel
not
sending something to the wedding...lessee...a DVD of La Cage?...naw, y'all
both
probably have copies...a weekend getaway at Fire Island?...naw, no point
in
subjecting a couple of cracker packers to that kind of ridicule...AHA! A
great
big bucket of kosher pickles, a dozen foot-long Hebrew Nationals, and a
crate of
KY! The perfect gift for you two lovebirds!

Congrats, you big silly jabbering loonies, you,
Pug or Kug or Dickie or whatever

Dear Pug Knuckler
Come on Pug, you can answer the question. Are you making money off this war?
Its a very simple question.

A little or a lot? Fat cost plus contract, or just the usual? Normal
kickback or just a campaign contribution thru a fictitious cutout? Or even
an "honest (for Haliburton at least) competitive" deal among friends? Lets
hear from someone in the know. How about it Pug? You cashing in on this War
thingy?

Dave

"B J Conner" wrote in message
news:mUFfd.3925$jD4.1196@trnddc06...



Somebody is paying him something. Cheny probably fell in love with him
when
he saw him pull 29.92 on an onion sack. Yesterday was St. Crispins day, I
wonder if the vultures and chicken hawks have a day to reminisce and
chortle
over their foul deeds.


Oppooortunity my friend. In War there is opportunity, money to be made,
contracts to write, budgets to loot. And it mostly comes out of the Social
Security surplus. See, its all Joe Sixpack's money, right there for the
stealing. Nice and neat. Its Joe's blood, Joe's social security, and Joe's
kid's future. Its predatory capitalism at its best and if you wrap it in the
ol red, white and blue, Joe might even steal it for you. Keep Joe in the
dark, keep Joe in debt and, hell Joe might even thank you for ****ing him
out of his birthright of freedom.

Dave