Keyes to appeal case on Obama's eligibility

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.


The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't. So why don't you show everyone:


Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.


English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.


giles

Great start so far for Obama..............just fabulous. Oh for a real
president again rather than an empty suit.....

On Mar 29, 2:49*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. *I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.

This is pretty devastating stuff. I guess this is what you meant by
unintended consequences, huh?

The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't.

Oh......well, never mind then.

So why don't you show everyone:

As noted above, it's pretty obvious that this is what you are doing
now (and a fine job of it you are doing, I might add). Thus, there is
hardly any need for ME to show anyone, ainna?

Or, perhaps, I am so out of my depth here that in fact I AM showing
everyone. Whattya think......I am making a fool of myself here?

Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. *I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.

I don't know what that means.



English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.

Does that mean you don't know?

giles

On Mar 29, 2:42*pm, "Fred" wrote:
On 29-Mar-2009, wrote:

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"
*giles
Dilhole *Wikipedia - An individual lacking intelligence, people skills,
compassion, and a human soul.

An apt description for an asshole like you and your alter ego Wolf****
You are a pompous ass under any monicker
I am surprised that no one has slapped the **** out of you


Thank you, freddie. I can't remember the last time I encountered
someone as helpful as you in usenet. You are a credit to your
species.

Good riddance plonk

Oops. Oh well.

g.

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 2:49*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. *I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.

This is pretty devastating stuff. I guess this is what you meant by
unintended consequences, huh?

And your finest effort has been "I'm just stupid" so what do you
expect?


The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't.

Oh......well, never mind then.

So why don't you show everyone:

As noted above, it's pretty obvious that this is what you are doing
now (and a fine job of it you are doing, I might add). Thus, there is
hardly any need for ME to show anyone, ainna?

You are obviously an expert given your critique, will you be
demonstrating how you came by your expertise or just continue as you
are, winning at playing stupid.


Or, perhaps, I am so out of my depth here that in fact I AM showing
everyone. Whattya think......I am making a fool of myself here?

I think you are a boring ****. Unlikely you will ever do anything that
approaches humor.



Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. *I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.

I don't know what that means.

Should I be surprised?




English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.

Does that mean you don't know?

It has been a while since I saw someone try to pretend they are a bot.


giles

On Mar 29, 5:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 2:49*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. *I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.

This is pretty devastating stuff. *I guess this is what you meant by
unintended consequences, huh?

And your finest effort has been "I'm just stupid" so what do you
expect?

Hm......

Your use of quotation marks suggests that you believe, or want someone
else to believe, that I said that. I don't remember saying that. In
any case, it's kind of hard to assess whether your asking for me to
critique my own presumed efforts or are simply asking a rhetorical
question. Could you please help me out here?


The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't.

Oh......well, never mind then.

So why don't you show everyone:

As noted above, it's pretty obvious that this is what you are doing
now (and a fine job of it you are doing, I might add). *Thus, there is
hardly any need for ME to show anyone, ainna?

You are obviously an expert given your critique,

Thanks. That's very kind of you.

will you be demonstrating how you came by your expertise

I'm not all sure I'd know how to go about that.

or just continue as you are, winning at playing stupid.

Well, they say it isn't whether you win or lose, it's how you play the
game that counts. Frankly, I've never been any more impressed with
this particular bit of folk wisdom than any other, but I suppose there
are instances in which it applies to some good purpose or other. In
any case, I don't think there are many people who would argue
forcefully for the proposition that there is anything intrinsically
wrong with winning on the face of it. Allinteresting fodder for
thought, but it really doesn't answer your question, does it. I guess
the best answer I can give you is that I have a limited repertoire and
thus will probably go on as before. The consequences, whether
intended or otherwise, will....nay MUST.....be what they are. Does
that help at all?

Or, perhaps, I am so out of my depth here that in fact I AM showing
everyone. *Whattya think......I am making a fool of myself here?

I think you are a boring ****.

And yet, here you are.

Unlikely you will ever do anything that approaches humor.

De gustibus non est disputandum.

No telling what someone else might find humorous, eh?

Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. *I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.

I don't know what that means.

Should I be surprised?

We could be here for days if we start to delve into what you should
be. Personally, I don't mind that a bit; I've always greatly enjoyed
spending time with new friends.

English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.

Does that mean you don't know?

It has been a while since I saw someone try to pretend they are a bot.

I don't know what that means.

giles

In , "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


can you idiots stop crossposting to Rec.outdoors.fishing.fly-fishing?

That might be a bit hard for anyone to do seeing as how that group doesn't
exist.

Then again, in your little world, maybe it does.

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:42:49 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 5:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 2:49*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. *I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.

This is pretty devastating stuff. *I guess this is what you meant by
unintended consequences, huh?

And your finest effort has been "I'm just stupid" so what do you
expect?

Hm......

Obviously if something so simple caused you to pause thinking is not a
forte.


Your use of quotation marks suggests that you believe, or want someone
else to believe, that I said that.

No, but it is a lovely fantasy on your part. Please do continue.

I don't remember saying that. In
any case, it's kind of hard to assess whether your asking for me to
critique my own presumed efforts or are simply asking a rhetorical
question. Could you please help me out here?

Ah, yes, he returns to has safe place. No sense actually stepping up
and showing his expertise. So you are one of those wanks that is
actually incapable of doing that which they critique.




The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't.

Oh......well, never mind then.

So why don't you show everyone:

As noted above, it's pretty obvious that this is what you are doing
now (and a fine job of it you are doing, I might add). *Thus, there is
hardly any need for ME to show anyone, ainna?

You are obviously an expert given your critique,

Thanks. That's very kind of you.

Context snip, that is your best, really? How sad.


will you be demonstrating how you came by your expertise

I'm not all sure I'd know how to go about that.

I can see that. The lack would seem prohibitive.


or just continue as you are, winning at playing stupid.

Well, they say it isn't whether you win or lose, it's how you play the
game that counts. Frankly, I've never been any more impressed with
this particular bit of folk wisdom than any other, but I suppose there
are instances in which it applies to some good purpose or other. In
any case, I don't think there are many people who would argue
forcefully for the proposition that there is anything intrinsically
wrong with winning on the face of it. Allinteresting fodder for
thought, but it really doesn't answer your question, does it. I guess
the best answer I can give you is that I have a limited repertoire and
thus will probably go on as before. The consequences, whether
intended or otherwise, will....nay MUST.....be what they are. Does
that help at all?

Well, I've seen PKB that bloviated longer, Mr. One Note, but it was a
fine effort as PKB go. I'd advise less verbiage so that you don't bore
people into submission.



Or, perhaps, I am so out of my depth here that in fact I AM showing
everyone. *Whattya think......I am making a fool of myself here?

I think you are a boring ****.

And yet, here you are.

I'm a ****head. I'll take that over boring **** anyday.


Unlikely you will ever do anything that approaches humor.

De gustibus non est disputandum.

So your tastes run to pretentious blowhard.

No telling what someone else might find humorous, eh?

Do you carry one of those air horns in case people start to fall
asleep as you speak?


Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. *I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.

I don't know what that means.

Should I be surprised?

We could be here for days if we start to delve into what you should
be.

So your ignorance is less than a surprise to you also?


Personally, I don't mind that a bit; I've always greatly enjoyed
spending time with new friends.

Will you be performing more of your famous variations on a single
note?



English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.

Does that mean you don't know?

It has been a while since I saw someone try to pretend they are a bot.

I don't know what that means.

You could try to be less ignorant.


giles

Aratzio wrote:
got double secret probation for
writing:
De gustibus non est disputandum.

So your tastes run to pretentious blowhard.

Priceless.

But as much as I like to see little Wolfie get his "Usenet nasty jerk"
ass kicked up one side and down the other I can't help but feel just
a little bit guilty that we on roff didn't train him better for this
Usenet "Nasty Jerk" contest. I mean c'mon, little Wolfie is way out
of his league here and some of it is our fault for being a relatively
peaceful little corner of cyberspace.

YOU GO LITTLE WOLFIE !!! As long as this crossposting crap lasts we'll
be rooting for you !!

But when it dies down we need to put our little Wolfie in training.
We should not tolerate one of our own getting his little ass kicked
all over Usenet just because we're relatively civil here on roff and
don't put our nasty jerks through their paces.

What do you say guys, who else will volunteer one week of sparring
with the nasty little jerk so that roff isn't embarrassed to send our
nasty little jerk against the biggest and best jerks on Usenet ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Mar 29, 8:10*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:42:49 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:





On Mar 29, 5:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 2:49*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:33:35 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:43*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 29, 12:06*pm, Aratzio wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, got double secret probation for
writing:

On Mar 28, 7:54 pm, "Jack Pine Savage" wrote:

How are all of your little fly tying friends going to feel about you
for bringing a whole set of posters into your little world? I'll bet they
really like you now.

Well, some of us are grateful. *Some of us like new toys.

Careful what you ask for, cupcake.

I didn't ask for anything.

Sorry for using a common everyday expression to confuse your
simplistic thought process.

That's o.k., I'm used to it.

The fact you were claiming you had found
"new toys" and that you like them is indicative of your need.

Go back and read it again. *I said nothing about finding new toys.

If you keep backpedalling that hard you might create a time warp.

This is pretty devastating stuff. *I guess this is what you meant by
unintended consequences, huh?

And your finest effort has been "I'm just stupid" so what do you
expect?

Hm......

Obviously if something so simple caused you to pause thinking is not a
forte.

Which is precisely why I've come to you for help.

Your use of quotation marks suggests that you believe, or want someone
else to believe, that I said that.

No, but it is a lovely fantasy on your part. Please do continue.

Not muchinterested in fantasy. What does is interest me is what your
use of quotation marks signifies. Seems to me that we could save time
on this if you were smply to tell me rather my offering a series of
guesses. How about it?

I don't remember saying that. *In
any case, it's kind of hard to assess whether your asking for me to
critique my own presumed efforts or are simply asking a rhetorical
question. *Could you please help me out here?

Ah, yes, he returns to has safe place.

Safe place? Would that be anything like offering a series of vacant
phrases in lieu of answers to questions?

No sense actually stepping up
and showing his expertise.

Has someone claimed expertise in something or other here and nobody
told me?

So you are one of those wanks that is
actually incapable of doing that which they critique.

What have I critiqued and what connection might that have to anyone's
capacity to do whatever it might be?

The
statement that was expressed is a warning given to those too stupid to
grasp that the fulfillment of their desires may in fact have
unintended consequences.

You'd be surprised at what can result in unintended consequences.

No, I wouldn't.

Oh......well, never mind then.

So why don't you show everyone:

As noted above, it's pretty obvious that this is what you are doing
now (and a fine job of it you are doing, I might add). *Thus, there is
hardly any need for ME to show anyone, ainna?

You are obviously an expert given your critique,

Thanks. *That's very kind of you.

Context snip, that is your best, really? How sad.

Context snip? Who did what to whatever context you may be referring
to. I merely thanked you for kind words. I am at a complete loss in
trying to figure out why that apparently bothers you. Could you
explain, please?

will you be demonstrating how you came by your expertise

I'm not all sure I'd know how to go about that.

I can see that.

Then why did you ask?

The lack would seem prohibitive.


I'll take it on faith that that means something or other.

or just continue as you are, winning at playing stupid.

Well, they say it isn't whether you win or lose, it's how you play the
game that counts. *Frankly, I've never been any more impressed with
this particular bit of folk wisdom than any other, but I suppose there
are instances in which it applies to some good purpose or other. *In
any case, I don't think there are many people who would argue
forcefully for the proposition that there is anything intrinsically
wrong with winning on the face of it. *Allinteresting fodder for
thought, but it really doesn't answer your question, does it. *I guess
the best answer I can give you is that I have a limited repertoire and
thus will probably go on as before. *The consequences, whether
intended or otherwise, will....nay MUST.....be what they are. *Does
that help at all?

Well, I've seen PKB that bloviated longer, Mr. One Note, but it was a
fine effort as PKB go.

PKB? What means?

I'd advise less verbiage so that you don't bore
people into submission.

Submission? Who is being asked to submit to what?

Or, perhaps, I am so out of my depth here that in fact I AM showing
everyone. *Whattya think......I am making a fool of myself here?

I think you are a boring ****.

And yet, here you are.

I'm a ****head.

O.k.

I'll take that over boring **** anyday.

Take what you please.

Unlikely you will ever do anything that approaches humor.

De gustibus non est disputandum.

So your tastes run to pretentious blowhard.

Actually, I have a broad range of tastes covering a large spectrum.
Pretentious blowhards can be interesting enough for any of a number of
reasons, but are not necessarily so. In any case, I do not find them
interesting simply for being pretentious blowhards.....they must have
some other redeeming virtue.

No telling what someone else might find humorous, eh? * * *

Do you carry one of those air horns in case people start to fall
asleep as you speak?

Seems to me that anyone who is bored by this exchange has a readily
available and easy to exercise option. Of course, I may be
wrong.....perhaps it isn't so easy. Perhaps there are people who
truly can't help themselves and MUST remain engaged against their
wills. I dunno.

Does that help with your understanding of common phraseology and the
usage of said phraseology or would you like to continue displaying
your abject ignorance?

Hm......

I guess I'll stick around for a while. *I'm learning SO much!

Please do, the "I'm just stupid" troll went out in the mid-90s.

I don't know what that means.

Should I be surprised?

We could be here for days if we start to delve into what you should
be. *

So your ignorance is less than a surprise to you also?

My ignorance knows no bounds. Just one of many differences between
us.

Personally, I don't mind that a bit; I've always greatly enjoyed
spending time with new friends.

Will you be performing more of your famous variations on a single
note?

If you insist.

English isn't your first language is it?

Says the dillhole unable to comprehend simple and commonly used
English

Of course, some things are easier to learn than others. *What's a
"dillhole?"

You know, there is thing they call "the google" and it is a "website"
on "the internets" lots of fascinating instruction can be found there.

Does that mean you don't know?

It has been a while since I saw someone try to pretend they are a bot.

I don't know what that means.

You could try to be less ignorant.

That is my mission in life, and I appreciate all the help I can get.

giles