ROFF history

wrote in message
...
In article , says...

wrote in message
oups.com...
The following questions are not to be answered publically.
They are presented for you to evauate in private.

Are you heterosexual?

What would that matter?

Do you or will ever have children?

What would that matter?

Think about how you will feel when your children visit
Google groups 10 years from now, and discover their father's
odd obsession: a man who posts 10 times a day, often during
working hours,

Matter of opinion, I guess?

Poor Sandy, writing for the reading comprehension challenged is
tough.

Yes, well I not so certain that Sandy dear gave much thought to what he was
writing. Yet, he has got you to defend him--I guess that counts for
something among homophobes?


His lead in questions were not a questioning of Wolfie's
masculinity....well not in the first order.

Where did I question whether Sandy was concerned about Wolfgang's
masculinity?

His point was, "Would [Wolfgang] be proud if his kids grew up
and 10 years from now saw how he behaved on this newsgroup."

So what would Wolfgang's sexual preference have to do with what his kids
might think, at some future date, about something Wolfgang might have posted
to ROFF?

No matter Wolgang's sexual proclivities, his kids, may or may not care what
he posted ten years in the past--big deal. I'd more think that his kids
would care more greatly about how Wolfgang had treated them and their
mother/other father, over that ten year period.

Op
- Ken

In article ,
says...

wrote in message
His point was, "Would [Wolfgang] be proud if his kids grew up
and 10 years from now saw how he behaved on this newsgroup."

So what would Wolfgang's sexual preference have to do with what his kids
might think, at some future date, about something Wolfgang might have posted
to ROFF?

I guess we can add basic reasoning to the list of things for you to work
on.

If he likes guys, he's unlikely to be having sexual relations with
women and is therefore unlikely to have kids.

If I need to explain it farther I'm afraid you'll just need to go
ask your father to explain it to you.
- Ken

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
oups.com...

Are you heterosexual?

This is one of those instances in which the question is infinitely more
interesting than the distressingly prosaic answer. Yes, I am.

In light of this most recent revelation: I must decline any sleeping
arrangements that place us in the same tent--ever again!, unless you first
ask my mother for my hand in marriage.

Love,
Op

wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

wrote in message
His point was, "Would [Wolfgang] be proud if his kids grew up
and 10 years from now saw how he behaved on this newsgroup."

So what would Wolfgang's sexual preference have to do with what his kids
might think, at some future date, about something Wolfgang might have
posted
to ROFF?

I guess we can add basic reasoning to the list of things for you to work
on.

That, or, we could just surmise that you don't know Sandy's mind any bettter
than he does himself!

If he likes guys, he's unlikely to be having sexual relations with
women and is therefore unlikely to have kids.

So, you know for a fact that Wolfgang cannot adopt children, in any state in
the union? Where is it that you say that you live? Do they not have
adoption agencies there?

If I need to explain it farther I'm afraid you'll just need to go
ask your father to explain it to you.

Thanks for the suggestion, but as dad rests on a shelf, in a box, in my
living room, I doubt very seriously that he'd be of much help.

The depth of your thought processes is extremely shallow, Ken.

Op
- Ken

wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

That, or, we could just surmise that you don't know Sandy's mind any
bettter
than he does himself!

I would surmise that I don't know Sandy's mind better than he
does himself.

Exactly what I was suggesting to you. Yet you seem to think that you know
*exactly* what someone is thinking, regardless of what that person has
written here. I only claim to know what some person writes here, means to
me. If that person, is incapable of putting together a coherent thought and
then posting it to ROFF, I'm not to blame for their incompetence. If a
person, prefaces their thoughts with homophobic attitudes, and then declares
that they have nothing further to say on the subject, I presume them to be
HOMOPHOBIC--go figure?

Question is, can you figure out why that's perfectly
okay?

It's an irrelevant question. Why would it matter to me?

Thanks for the suggestion, but as dad rests on a shelf, in a box, in my
living room, I doubt very seriously that he'd be of much help.

I'm sure he's proud.

No, he's dead! Think about it--this is where the ability to reason might
come in handy--he's on a shelf, in abox, in my living room. Either he's
very tiny in stature and isn't likely to weigh very much-- relatively
speaking for a human (remember, he's on a shelf, in a box, in my living
room; he's an average sized human and I have a large shelf, on which I keep
a box, in which I keep my father, in my living room (Yes, I know, you and
Kenny K. and rw can picture that perfectly); or, could it be that HE'S DEAD!
and his ashes are contained in a box that rests on a shelf, in my living
room?

Now, having deduced this most perplexing conundrum: Do you honestly think
that he could *really* be proud?

The depth of your thought processes is extremely shallow, Ken.

Wow, compliments from both you and Wolfie in just two days time.
Must be gettin' nippy in Hell.

Yep, deductive reasoning is your specialty!

Op --Of course, you never answered my questions about adoption--go
figure?--

- Ken

In article ,
says...
Thanks for the suggestion, but as dad rests on a shelf, in a box, in my
living room, I doubt very seriously that he'd be of much help.

I'm sure he's proud.

No, he's dead! Think about it--this is where the ability to reason might
come in handy--he's on a shelf, in abox, in my living room. Either he's
very tiny in stature and isn't likely to weigh very much-- relatively
speaking for a human (remember, he's on a shelf, in a box, in my living
room; he's an average sized human and I have a large shelf, on which I keep
a box, in which I keep my father, in my living room (Yes, I know, you and
Kenny K. and rw can picture that perfectly); or, could it be that HE'S DEAD!
and his ashes are contained in a box that rests on a shelf, in my living
room?

Now, having deduced this most perplexing conundrum: Do you honestly think
that he could *really* be proud?

Oh my god!!! I can't believe you are going to argue about this.

Are you really *THAT* stupid?!?!? Do you even realize how well you
are illustrating your lack of both reasoning and reading comprehension
ability?

Do you honestly think that I misread the "in a box on a shelf in your
living room"? Unlike you, I can actually read.

Or maybe you did mean you had a tiny father, he sure spawned a mental
midget.
- Ken

wrote:
In article ,
says...

wrote in message
His point was, "Would [Wolfgang] be proud if his kids grew up
and 10 years from now saw how he behaved on this newsgroup."

So what would Wolfgang's sexual preference have to do with what his kids
might think, at some future date, about something Wolfgang might have posted
to ROFF?

I guess we can add basic reasoning to the list of things for you to work
on.

If he likes guys, he's unlikely to be having sexual relations with
women and is therefore unlikely to have kids.

If I need to explain it farther I'm afraid you'll just need to go
ask your father to explain it to you.

So, you're saying that Sandy is as dumb as you?.......that a simple
concept like asoption is beyond his intellectual capacity?

Hm.....maybe so.

Wolfgang

wrote:
In article ,
says...
Thanks for the suggestion, but as dad rests on a shelf, in a box, in my
living room, I doubt very seriously that he'd be of much help.

I'm sure he's proud.

No, he's dead! Think about it--this is where the ability to reason might
come in handy--he's on a shelf, in abox, in my living room. Either he's
very tiny in stature and isn't likely to weigh very much-- relatively
speaking for a human (remember, he's on a shelf, in a box, in my living
room; he's an average sized human and I have a large shelf, on which I keep
a box, in which I keep my father, in my living room (Yes, I know, you and
Kenny K. and rw can picture that perfectly); or, could it be that HE'S DEAD!
and his ashes are contained in a box that rests on a shelf, in my living
room?

Now, having deduced this most perplexing conundrum: Do you honestly think
that he could *really* be proud?

Oh my god!!! I can't believe you are going to argue about this.

Are you really *THAT* stupid?!?!? Do you even realize how well you
are illustrating your lack of both reasoning and reading comprehension
ability?

Do you honestly think that I misread the "in a box on a shelf in your
living room"? Unlike you, I can actually read.

Or maybe you did mean you had a tiny father, he sure spawned a mental
midget.

And yet, you're sure that Mark's father is proud.

Go ahead......explain it.

Wolfgang
this is SUCH fun!

In article .com,
says...

that a simple
concept like asoption is beyond his intellectual capacity?

I don't know. His fables were pretty complex.
- Ken

wrote:
In article .com,
says...

that a simple
concept like asoption is beyond his intellectual capacity?

I don't know. His fables were pretty complex.

Surrender accepted.

Wolfgang
was there any doubt?