![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chas Wade wrote:
Darin Minor wrote: Chums will actually start to darken up faster than pinks, they'll start in the salt water. As far as I'm concerned, the smoker isn't even good enough for chums. There is a reason they call 'em dog salmon. Well, one side of me wants to leave this comment alone so there will be more chums for me, but the other side just couldn't leave it at that. I caught several bright chums last year on the Sky above Monroe. They were tasty grilled, no need to smoke them. As a biological note, the salt/fresh thing isn't involved in the timing of the fish turning color. They turn in anticipation of spawning, at a standard interval before the actual spawning starts. If they are Hoodsport fish, they often change completely in the salt. If they are Skagit, Sky, or Stilly fish, they change as much as a week or two after heading up the river. Particularly in the case of chums, the color alone doesn't tell you they aren't fresh any more. Alaskan fish that spawn in small creeks that dump straight into the salt often only spend the last few days of their lives in the fresh water. I do wonder when the Yukon river kings change color. They have over 2000 miles of fresh water to navigate. Chas http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html I just wrote what I'd read at one time, not actual personal experience. Thanks for clarifying for me. Just because they'll darken early doesn't mean I won't fish for 'em, I've heard that they'll take some line. Darin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darin Minor wrote:
I just wrote what I'd read at one time, not actual personal experience. Thanks for clarifying for me. You're welcome. We need to get together and fish some time. Just because they'll darken early doesn't mean I won't fish for 'em, I've heard that they'll take some line. I had a 15 pounder at Hoodsport take 50 yards of my packing out to sea and then jump several times way out there. The guy next to me looked over and asked, "Is that your fish way out there?". Between the grunts I said, "You betcha". That was my 10x10 with 15 pound leader and the drag turned up tight. Kings don't fight any harder pound for pound. Oh, and that fish was too dark to keep. Chas http://home.comcast.net/~chas.wade/w...ome.html-.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Warren" wrote I also noticed something that I haven't seen before happen. It seemed like in certain areas flocks of fishermen would congregate on a nice run and fan out for some combat fishing. The water would be totally open upstream and downstream for as far as you could see, but people would still group together like that. We would just keep on going and find a nice place to ourselves. I still don't understand why that was happening since there are fish all over the river. Not that it matters, but I've noticed this for years, and it IS getting more and more obvious in fly fishing. I have some theories G Preface: I am a loner, and have backpacked, hunted and fished alone for all my life, starting well before I was old enough to drive myself to the Sierra to hike alone for a week. I'm not a hermit, and I don't "avoid" others, nor do I dislike being around them, but I don't seek them out, either. I've been aware of being "different" in this respect since my teen years and before .... that is probably why I've thought about the "whys" of why people "gang fish" or "gang hunt" and the very, very obvious trend the last 15 years towards "foursomes" in fly fishing Briefly, the theories (1) Many people, naturally, have a deep "fear" ( can't think of a better word ) of being alone. In past cultures, time alone was far more common and more people became comfortable with that aloneness. But this is far more pronounced in our modern age where many people have had the damn TV or a radio or a frickin cell phone on nearly every waking moment that they have not had other humans in sight. ( why do they "need" the cell phone or walkie talkie?.. often it ain't information sharing, it's to avoid being alone ) I think our "technoculture" is increasing the level of "aloneness fear" in many people by very simply never allowing them to practice aloneness. (3) More, percentage wise, people are being raised in crowded conditions, with little or any time really alone. Yesterday I watched the 10 year old neighbor kid BB gun hunting the counside around here and thought about how few youngsters today EVER get that far from a crowd and he was only about 1/2 mile from home, but alone (3) A LOT of people getting into fly fishing the last decade or so have no, zero, other real outdoors experience, none. From many, mowing the lawn is a wilderness experience, and big cities are not too crowded. If you or I head into the backcountry ... alone .... then step off the trail with the intention of going miles cross country, alone, we will experience, if only briefly, the emotional attachment the human being has for the security of other humans and the "man made" ....regardless of our outdoors experience level. For all of us, to some degree, manmade = secure, Nature = scary I KNOW it "sounds stupid" to anyone with real outdoors experience, but I see people on the stream that seem so uncomfortable outdoors that I bet they are afraid to enter the "wilderness" between "gang fishers," alone. Heah, think of the guys that think they need a damn gun to leave the paved road, before you poo poo the idea G (4) common ones that have affected all fishermen and hunters at one time "he's catching let's move over there" "I don't know the area but everyone seems to be over there, that must be good" and the very human "monkey see, monkey do" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh and one more thingG
If, after you "just continued and found a nice place to yourselves" I had come along, alone, I'd have wondered why you were all in the same damn area G Everything depends on perspective. The picture of everyone in the boat looks pretty claustrophobic to me :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
Oh and one more thingG If, after you "just continued and found a nice place to yourselves" I had come along, alone, I'd have wondered why you were all in the same damn area G Everything depends on perspective. The picture of everyone in the boat looks pretty claustrophobic to me :-) I fish alone at least 90% of the time, very often in wilderness. One of the things I really like about the claves is the chance to fish with other people for a change. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "rw" wrote I fish alone at least 90% of the time, very often in wilderness. One of the things I really like about the claves is the chance to fish with other people for a change. Yes, I know ... recently you posted a TR about a place that required a decent walk and commented that you never see others there. I think many people avoid these places, NOT because of the work, but rather because of fear ... subtle fear, but fear, nonetheless. I spent a lot of "people watching" time in Jellystone this summer and it was very obvious that the vast majority of people started to feel uncomfortable the first step off pavement, and very uncomfortable where the "human track" ended, even if it was in sight of the car. One weird thing I noticed was several times as many early morning joggers running the roads near Madison Junction camp, as running the trail along the Madison ... there has to be a reason ... these joggers aren't afraid of exercise, why the road? And, I've read and envy your posts about cross country sking alone, too. One of my legs points nearly 90 degrees from the other and I can't track in skis ... simply can't ... can't walk in snoeshoes without getting tangled either :-(( I tried getting bindings specially fitted but never succeeded .... At this point, I'm WAY too obese and old, anyway, but never getting to really "do" winter mountaineering is one of my regrets. I envy you your location and health. I may try a "clave" someday, but, maybe not G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
And, I've read and envy your posts about cross country sking alone, too. I never XC ski alone. At least one of my dogs is always with me. :-) I typically take them both in the morning, and then leave my rather elderly Golden, Arlo, at home in the afternoon, and take my Border Collie, who has boundless energy and wicked speed, for a hard, fast ski in the afternoon. Arlo, who normally hates to be left alone, watches us leave the cabin with clear gratitude. XC skiing has something of the same appeal for me as fishing. It's an exercise that makes getting out something more than just a walk in the woods. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) BTW, you might try skate skiing. Instead of tracking in a straight line you angle the skis, kind of like ice skates. And you can go fast! The only problem is that you need a well groomed trail or hard crust. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() rw wrote: Larry L wrote: Oh and one more thingG If, after you "just continued and found a nice place to yourselves" I had come along, alone, I'd have wondered why you were all in the same damn area G Everything depends on perspective. The picture of everyone in the boat looks pretty claustrophobic to me :-) I fish alone at least 90% of the time, very often in wilderness. One of the things I really like about the claves is the chance to fish with other people for a change. I echo the sentiment. Fishing with different people is also a good way to learn new things. In addition to personal differences, I like there are some regional differences. Willi |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry L wrote: Not that it matters, but I've noticed this for years, and it IS getting more and more obvious in fly fishing. I have some theories G I think that part of it has to do with new fly fishermen learning how to fly fish on famous, very heavily fished waters where the fishing is a "social event." Willi |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... I am a loner, and [have a great opinion of myself.....especially compared to all the pants wetting effete latter day pantywaists I somehow unaccountably run into in every lonely place I go to]. Well, "Everything depends on perspective", as a wise man once said. I am not a loner.....except occasionally by happenstance. But in the past thirty years I've gone on more solo backpacking, hitchhiking, bicycle touring, day tripping, bird watching, hunting, and fishing trips than I can count. Spent as much as three weeks out on backpacking trips, and six or more bike touring or hitchhiking. A lot of these outings were solo as much because none of my friends were interested in participating in a particular trip as for any other reason. It has always been tempting to think of myself as some sort of hardy outdoor individualists or some such ****, but it's very hard to carry it off. For you see, like Colin Fletcher (though he said it better), every time I've found myself at the end of the road or trail, up against the wall, the last impenetrable thicket beyond which no man can possibly go, somebody has stepped out from the other side, calmly dusted him or herself off, nodded a "howdee do", and continued on over the horizon. While it is certainly true that there are a lot of people who never get TO, let alone off, the beaten path, there are millions of others who routinely do **** that makes my hair stand on end. Your observations on the multitudes of the fearful and inept you encounter frequently enough to codify their behavior says at least as much about your habits as theirs. Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|