![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Bob Weinberger wrote: ... Yes my saying that your stating that "...we make more money than you." IMPLIES that you are including yourself in the group that makes the big bucks is an absolutely outstanding example of my predisposition to lying, distorting, and micharacterization. ... Excellent, confession they say is good for the soul. And, finally we've found common ground. Well if if I believed you were being serious with that statement rather than just continuing to proudly uphold your status as an asshole, it would confirm that those of you who hold themselves to be smarter than most are seriously deluding themselves and just don't get sarcasm. Yeah, it's awfully hard to recognize sarcasm when it comes from swiftboaters. I mean you guys have to practice lying to be that damn good at it, don't you ? -- Ken Fortenberry |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 11:26*pm, Peaceful Bill
wrote: You didn't answer the question. *What dat6e did the La. gov ask the Feds to come in? Fair enough. According to cnn.com (http://tinyurl.com/5pd8rd) and factcheck.org (http://tinyurl.com/6peqf5) it was on Aug 27, two days before Katrina hit. My questions to you: 1) When was the White House and FEMA notified that a hurricane of this intensity could cause this level of destruction? (and as a supplement, what did FEMA do about it in advance to prepare the city for a hurricane of this intensity?) 2) When did FEMA learn of the people stranded in the Convention Center? 3) When did FEMA learn that the levees had been breached? 4) When did FEMA actually send assistance in? --riverman (Who wishes he could be generous enough to claim your posts are merely partisan.) |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message news ![]() Bob Weinberger wrote: ... Yes my saying that your stating that "...we make more money than you." IMPLIES that you are including yourself in the group that makes the big bucks is an absolutely outstanding example of my predisposition to lying, distorting, and micharacterization. ... Excellent, confession they say is good for the soul. And, finally we've found common ground. -- Ken Fortenberry George Soros has more money than most Republicans. So that shoots your statement full of holes to start with. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... Yeah, it's awfully hard to recognize sarcasm when it comes from swiftboaters. I mean you guys have to practice lying to be that damn good at it, don't you ? -- Ken Fortenberry Oh, lets see if we can follow the logic of your "superior intelligence". 1. You assume that I am a liar (though I defy you to find even one instance where I oughtright lied. You can find instances where I admitted that my rememberance of things that happened 30+years ago may be colored by my disdain for a certain politician, but no instances of outright lying. On the other hand I can easily find at least one instance where you outright lied and, despite ample evidence from many sources that you lied, you continue to repeat that lie.) 2. I make a sarcastic statement , that despite you considering me to be a liar, you readily accept at face value as a true statement, thus not recognizing it as sarcasm. After all in the view of you smarter than average types (at least in your own minds), if the statement happens to fit your narrow view of the world it must be the truth, even if it comes from someone you consider to be an inveterate liar. Yeah that's an excellent example of the flawless logic of "superior intelligence". And in case you didn't get it that last sentence was sarcastic. Bob Weinberger ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Yeah, it's awfully hard to recognize sarcasm when it comes from swiftboaters. I mean you guys have to practice lying to be that damn good at it, don't you ? Oh, lets see if we can follow the logic of your "superior intelligence". 1. You assume that I am a liar (though I defy you to find even one instance where I oughtright lied. You can find instances where I admitted that my rememberance of things that happened 30+years ago may be colored by my disdain for a certain politician, but no instances of outright lying. Instances of colored remembrance ? Oh that's good, real good. Obviously the work of a practiced prevaricator. LOL !! -- Ken Fortenberry |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... Instances of colored remembrance ? Oh that's good, real good. Obviously the work of a practiced prevaricator. LOL !! -- Ken Fortenberry Well as you are the resident expert on prevarication and the practice thereof, and a shining example of proper application of logic, I guess I will have to accept your astute analysis and retire from the field bloodied but unbowed. BTW, feel free to interpret the foregoing as your "superior intellect" allows. Bob Weinberger ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Instances of colored remembrance ? Oh that's good, real good. Obviously the work of a practiced prevaricator. LOL !! Well as you are the resident expert on prevarication and the practice thereof, and a shining example of proper application of logic, I guess I will have to accept your astute analysis and retire from the field bloodied but unbowed. Your first mistake was in assuming that I was attempting to make a logical argument. I clearly was not. The facts are the facts, Obama supporters are better educated and more affluent than the McCain voters. If you're looking for logic you'll have to supply your own, my posts to Mr. Jelly on that subject were more of the "neener, neener, neener" variety than attempts at logical discourse. You knew that, of course, you were just being a prick. BTW, feel free to interpret the foregoing as your "superior intellect" allows. Obama won and it just frosts your ass. And you're still smarting because I caught you lying through your teeth and called you and your swiftboat pals a despicable cancer on our body politic. But it doesn't take a lot of "intellect" to figure that out. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 10:24*am, Peaceful Bill
wrote: SNIP You are just one of those folks who cannot admit you've made a mistake. Here we've got one damn mess and instead of adapting, bozos like you keep ****ing into the wind, searching and stretching common sense and twisting new info in some pathetic and endless insistence that you were right all along and isn't it just like you say it is. Fact is after a while I avoid folks with your hangup. If I somehow need a fix of mule-brain I can always dial up Rush or that other paragon of under-education and duncedom, Glenn whatis. But I will have to agree with Scott, this last exercise of your's in arguing nonsense as a recompense for being 100% off the mark regarding history, Presidential politics, economics etc.. is definitely plonk-able enough. You remind me of a lawyer wanna-be friend of mine who would argue every position of an issue just for the hell of it. like it was as entertaining for others as it was for him. Kinda like the masterbating zoo monkey. There are several folks here who I radically disagree with, some who also advance some of the same bankrupt nonsense as yourself, but their contributions on the fishing side and on the comradeship side constitute a worthwhile package of a person. You may be a great guy in person, but until you come up with some fishing content to balance out your bull****, I will resist responding to your stuff. Plonk. Dave And I will focus more on the fishing side of ROFF |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message ... Obama won and it just frosts your ass. And you're still smarting because I caught you lying through your teeth and called you and your swiftboat pals a despicable cancer on our body politic. But it doesn't take a lot of "intellect" to figure that out. -- Ken Fortenberry No, it no more frosts my ass that Obama won, than if McCain had won. As I stated earlier, I think that though Obama has a very thin resume, he is marginally likely to be a better president than McCain would have been. I frankly supported neither of them. I pray for Obama's welfare because the thought of Biden as President scares me almost as much as the thought of Pallin in that position would have. As for my Swiftboat pals, yes acouple of my exshipmates and pals did serve with Swiftboats. One earned a Bronze star while on the ship I served with him and went on to earn a Silver Star while commanding a squadron of Swiftboats. The other had command of an LST in the Delta that served as a Swiftboat base. Both served in those capacities during the time Kerry was in Nam. Both are lifelong Democratic voters. While neither had any specific memories of events concerning Kerry, neither supported or had anything good to say about him, and both remembered him as a glory hound who made no secret of the fact that he was using his service as a vehicle follow in John Kennedy's footsteps. Despite my disdain for Kerry I said nothing about him during the campaign because as much as I disliked him, I thought Bush would make a terrible president. It was only after he lost, and it became apparent how bad Bush really was and partisans like you tried to make Kerry out to be a saint, that I spoke out. It seems that blind partisans like yourself cannot fathom the concept that just because someone doesn't support one candidate, they support the other. your final sentence: that's probably a good thing in your case. Bob Weinberger ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Obama won and it just frosts your ass. And you're still smarting because I caught you lying through your teeth and called you and your swiftboat pals a despicable cancer on our body politic. But it doesn't take a lot of "intellect" to figure that out. ... Despite my disdain for Kerry I said nothing about him during the campaign because as much as I disliked him, I thought Bush would make a terrible president. It was only after he lost, and it became apparent how bad Bush really was and partisans like you tried to make Kerry out to be a saint, that I spoke out. It seems that blind partisans like yourself cannot fathom the concept that just because someone doesn't support one candidate, they support the other. That's revisionist crap. Nobody tried to make Kerry out to be a saint but he didn't deserve, and the country didn't deserve, the lies, smears and garbage spewed by your well-heeled swiftboat pals. And you *continue* to spew the same old lies despite being caught in the act of lying. It wasn't but a few weeks ago you were still prattling on about Kerry dishonoring a uniform. And *that* is a ridiculous, stupid lie. There's more "honor" in a big, stinking pile of John Kerry's **** than in all the ****ing swiftboaters combined. And as for blind partisanship, I'd say the same damn thing if a group of scumbags tried to smear John McCain's military service. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obama's grandmother died | Scott Seidman | Fly Fishing | 0 | November 3rd, 2008 10:08 PM |