OT The Nature of Evil

Wolfgang wrote:

Not only for business. War is also immensely popular as
entertainment. We owe our survival as a species to the fact that
historically war has been second only to sex as a leisure time
activity. For the moment, making babies is still more popular than
incinerating and exploding them. But, it's a precarious balance that
could, especially in this day of weapons of mass destruction in the
hands of immoral and irresponsible idiots, tip at any moment.

I think you're being a little hard on Dubya.


Chuck Vance (or is that Cheney ... or Rumsfeld ... or all of the
above?)

Wolfgang wrote:

Not only for business. War is also immensely popular as
entertainment. We owe our survival as a species to the fact that
historically war has been second only to sex as a leisure time
activity. For the moment, making babies is still more popular than
incinerating and exploding them. But, it's a precarious balance that
could, especially in this day of weapons of mass destruction in the
hands of immoral and irresponsible idiots, tip at any moment.

I think you're being a little hard on Dubya.


Chuck Vance (or is that Cheney ... or Rumsfeld ... or all of the
above?)

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:53:11 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

Check out the birth date of his first daughter verses the date the
selective service did away with deferments for married men without
children.

Hoo boy. I always read these threads with interest so I can keep
informed of the far left thought process, but, BJ my friend, I think
it's time to put away the tin foil party hats. Obviously, you've left
yours on through a few lightning storms too many. ;-)


You weren't around then to know people who
did exactly that ? He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:53:11 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

Check out the birth date of his first daughter verses the date the
selective service did away with deferments for married men without
children.

Hoo boy. I always read these threads with interest so I can keep
informed of the far left thought process, but, BJ my friend, I think
it's time to put away the tin foil party hats. Obviously, you've left
yours on through a few lightning storms too many. ;-)


You weren't around then to know people who
did exactly that ? He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

GregP wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:53:11 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

Check out the birth date of his first daughter verses the date the
selective service did away with deferments for married men without
children.

Hoo boy. I always read these threads with interest so I can keep
informed of the far left thought process, but, BJ my friend, I think
it's time to put away the tin foil party hats. Obviously, you've left
yours on through a few lightning storms too many. ;-)

You weren't around then to know people who
did exactly that ?

Yes.

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

GregP wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:53:11 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

Check out the birth date of his first daughter verses the date the
selective service did away with deferments for married men without
children.

Hoo boy. I always read these threads with interest so I can keep
informed of the far left thought process, but, BJ my friend, I think
it's time to put away the tin foil party hats. Obviously, you've left
yours on through a few lightning storms too many. ;-)

You weren't around then to know people who
did exactly that ?

Yes.

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:13:26 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?" I guess that's what the RNC
does to the faithful.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:13:26 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:


He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?" I guess that's what the RNC
does to the faithful.

GregP wrote:
Tim J. wrote:

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?"

Yup - I'm assuming there was a female involved.

I guess that's what the RNC does to the faithful.

I wouldn't know. You'll have to to find out from one of them.
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

GregP wrote:
Tim J. wrote:

He did acquire 2, 3(?) deferments
before then and this was simply a way to get
another one when the path to others failed.

Hoo boy.... conspiracies EVERYWHERE! ;-)


A "conspiracy ?"

Yup - I'm assuming there was a female involved.

I guess that's what the RNC does to the faithful.

I wouldn't know. You'll have to to find out from one of them.
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj