If I caught a 3 foot jackbanok, can I be classed as a ****?

ah wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:

"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
. ..


You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Ooooh! Teh Rack!

Stretch him!

Yeah, when Wolfgang starts calling someone "Sparky," that's a telltale
sign that he's really getting into his game.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

ah wrote:
Wolfgang wrote:

"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
. ..


You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Ooooh! Teh Rack!

Stretch him!

Yeah, when Wolfgang starts calling someone "Sparky," that's a telltale
sign that he's really getting into his game.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:52:38 -0000, "Phil Kyle"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:50:36 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:58:49 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...
Please say yes, you sad *******s.

Well, gosh, Phil, you can be whatever you want to be.

Wolfgang
that's the beauty of low expectations.

Thanks for that, fancy a shag?

No thanks, I've got my own cigarettes.

Wolfgang


Don't you find Brum Uni bog cleaners sexy?

Actually, I probably don't have much more idea of what you're talking
about
than you do. However, I see by the latest spate of your replies to your
own
witticisms that you are a great deal more clever than even I gave you
credit
for. This is going to be SUCH fun. Please DO go on.

Wolfgang
oh, and LOOK!, now we've got the brit trailer trash reading too!


You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

I'm in two minds about that.

--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\


Hello Ray.


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:52:38 -0000, "Phil Kyle"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:50:36 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:58:49 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...
Please say yes, you sad *******s.

Well, gosh, Phil, you can be whatever you want to be.

Wolfgang
that's the beauty of low expectations.

Thanks for that, fancy a shag?

No thanks, I've got my own cigarettes.

Wolfgang


Don't you find Brum Uni bog cleaners sexy?

Actually, I probably don't have much more idea of what you're talking
about
than you do. However, I see by the latest spate of your replies to your
own
witticisms that you are a great deal more clever than even I gave you
credit
for. This is going to be SUCH fun. Please DO go on.

Wolfgang
oh, and LOOK!, now we've got the brit trailer trash reading too!


You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

I'm in two minds about that.

--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\


Hello Ray.


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
. ..

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

It's not a matter of my ignorance, really. I mean, I hardly ever get
dragged into anything like this......despite the fact that so many on ROFF
try. No, our little engagement here is actually a testament to your genius.
Hell, if I was as smart as you I'd be able to suck YOU in.......and maybe
even control the direction the conversation takes. I'd LIKE to be able to
do that but.......well, you know.

Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?

Who knows. Maybe we'll find out together, huh?

Wolfgang

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:43:28 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

It's not a matter of my ignorance, really. I mean, I hardly ever get
dragged into anything like this......despite the fact that so many on ROFF
try. No, our little engagement here is actually a testament to your genius.
Hell, if I was as smart as you I'd be able to suck YOU in.......and maybe
even control the direction the conversation takes. I'd LIKE to be able to
do that but.......well, you know.


Ah, the old "No, I'm trolling *you*" routine. Original stuff.


Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?

Who knows. Maybe we'll find out together, huh?


Perv!


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:43:28 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:38:25 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


"Phil Kyle" wrote in message
...

You're right about having no idea. I thought I'd already explained
this, but for the hard of thinking I'll do it again. The original post
was a forgery, it was not me, so no I am not replying to myself. Get
it?

And actual human beings should care.......because?


Oh right, nothing to do with you being ignorant then.

It's not a matter of my ignorance, really. I mean, I hardly ever get
dragged into anything like this......despite the fact that so many on ROFF
try. No, our little engagement here is actually a testament to your genius.
Hell, if I was as smart as you I'd be able to suck YOU in.......and maybe
even control the direction the conversation takes. I'd LIKE to be able to
do that but.......well, you know.


Ah, the old "No, I'm trolling *you*" routine. Original stuff.


Sic per gradus ad ima tenditur.

Know what I mean, Sparky? ;-)


Should I care?

Who knows. Maybe we'll find out together, huh?


Perv!


--

Phil Kyle abUsenet Arty Choke
\/////////////////////////////\
http://philkyle2003.greatnow.com/
\/////////////////////////////\