A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th, 2003, 05:41 PM
Finn Haug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've tried XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come over a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps to soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug




  #2  
Old September 24th, 2003, 06:29 PM
Bill Kiene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

Hi Finn,

The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod that is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.

For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the XP for
most.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've tried XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come over a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps to

soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug






  #3  
Old September 24th, 2003, 09:39 PM
Finn Haug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

Hi Bill,
Yes, the XP is really powerful! Well, I will be fishing mostly in rivers
with fishsize between 1.0 kg and 4-5 kg. Ocassionally fishes between 5 and
10 kg. With floating line only, sometimes with an intermediate leader. Im a
bit attracted to the medium fast aktion as the SLT, but Im afraid that its
too soft. With these spesifications, could an SLT be recommended?

Finn Haug




"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
m...
Hi Finn,

The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod that

is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.

For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the XP

for
most.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've tried

XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come over

a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps to

soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug








  #4  
Old September 25th, 2003, 08:13 AM
Bill Kiene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

Does 2.54 kg = 1 pound?

The XP is fast but the SLT is not slow. Just a little less power.

I like both series?

If I am looking for maximum distance, I would go for the XP.

If not, I like casting the SLT better.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi Bill,
Yes, the XP is really powerful! Well, I will be fishing mostly in rivers
with fishsize between 1.0 kg and 4-5 kg. Ocassionally fishes between 5 and
10 kg. With floating line only, sometimes with an intermediate leader. Im

a
bit attracted to the medium fast aktion as the SLT, but Im afraid that its
too soft. With these spesifications, could an SLT be recommended?

Finn Haug




"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
m...
Hi Finn,

The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod that

is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.

For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the XP

for
most.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've

tried
XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come

over
a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps to

soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with

both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug










  #5  
Old September 25th, 2003, 09:50 AM
Finn Haug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

1 pound is 0.454 kg.
Just now I feel going for the XP.

Finn


"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
y.com...
Does 2.54 kg = 1 pound?

The XP is fast but the SLT is not slow. Just a little less power.

I like both series?

If I am looking for maximum distance, I would go for the XP.

If not, I like casting the SLT better.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi Bill,
Yes, the XP is really powerful! Well, I will be fishing mostly in rivers
with fishsize between 1.0 kg and 4-5 kg. Ocassionally fishes between 5

and
10 kg. With floating line only, sometimes with an intermediate leader.

Im
a
bit attracted to the medium fast aktion as the SLT, but Im afraid that

its
too soft. With these spesifications, could an SLT be recommended?

Finn Haug




"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
m...
Hi Finn,

The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod

that
is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.

For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the

XP
for
most.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've

tried
XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come

over
a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps

to
soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with

both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug












  #6  
Old September 25th, 2003, 10:53 AM
Clark Reid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT


"Bill Kiene" wrote in message
Does 2.54 kg = 1 pound?


No, about 6 lb.


--
Clark Reid
http://www.dryflynz.com
Umpqua Designer Flytier


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.