If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure
in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... Chris Lets see how quick you can compile a list of all the fish you caught when the water temp was between 35 and 40 degrees in April on a Junebug lizard during a full moon and a West Wind. It all depends on why you save your data. If you want it just for memories then yeah your notebook would work great (I had one for a couple years until I wrote my fishing journal software), but if you want to use it to make yourself a better fisherman and have "quick" access to data (if you don't have hours to sort through years of written logs) then electronic is the way to go (IMHO). I wouldn't need that level of detail. I want it for memories and ease of entry. I look at it for fish caught and what date as an encouragement to go fishing for instance early in the season. Sometimes the most relevant info is just where and when but moon phase is not important. My lure choice will be determined by real time conditions out on the water and what i have in my tackle box.. A computer and software can be a SOW and turn fishing into work. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure
in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure
in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are
capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are
capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Chris, you realize that your pattern has now been recorded in the idiot's
notebook as a reliable, early-fall trolling one... Warren ;-) "Chris Rennert" wrote in message . .. Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Chris, you realize that your pattern has now been recorded in the idiot's
notebook as a reliable, early-fall trolling one... Warren ;-) "Chris Rennert" wrote in message . .. Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
I guess I believe there is always something you could say to make people
reflect on their actions and make them realize the time they spend on certain things could be better used in other ways. For some people that is just not possible. Oh well, I won't lose any sleep :-) Chris "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Chris, you realize that your pattern has now been recorded in the idiot's notebook as a reliable, early-fall trolling one... Warren ;-) "Chris Rennert" wrote in message . .. Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Now that's funny and I don't care who you are. I can see Al writing it down now "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Chris, you realize that your pattern has now been recorded in the idiot's notebook as a reliable, early-fall trolling one... Warren ;-) "Chris Rennert" wrote in message . .. Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Fishing Software...
Now that's funny and I don't care who you are. I can see Al writing it down now "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Chris, you realize that your pattern has now been recorded in the idiot's notebook as a reliable, early-fall trolling one... Warren ;-) "Chris Rennert" wrote in message . .. Lure builder, now this is a intellectual reply to a post. So I know you are capable, which tells me that you do the idiotic posts on purpose just to get a rise out of people. Why not just stay on the intelligent side of the line and contribute to this group. There are some great people here, and people you can learn from. Instead you opt to make stupid comments. You can compare and contrast your posts, and I know that you are not the idiot you pose as 90% of the time here. To me, I can care less, I just can't believe you would spend so much time and effort trying to get a rise out of people. Maybe my goals are different, but wouldn't you want people to look at your posts as valid, and not roll their eyes the second they see your name and not even read your posts? Oh well, to each his own. Chris "Lure builder" wrote in message ... In your opinion, but it can also improve efficiency, you could choose a lure in real-time, but maybe you are missing something in the whole picture. Maybe you are choosing the wrong lure. I see it time and time again, a person caught a fish on a lure in a specific instance, and so now that is all they throw thinking that this is the lure. Because you catch 2 fish in a spot doesn't mean you have found what they are eating, why didn't you catch 5 or 10 or 15. This may be unrealistic, but if I don't hook every fish in a given area I didn't do enough, so that keeps me on my toes and keeps me striving to do better. For instance, If I am fishing a deep hole for Steelhead, and I catch 10, and I see a guy across the river fishing the same hole catch one, I forget about the 10 I just landed and start wondering why I didn't catch that fish. This is what drives me in fishing, and I will never stop until I reach the point to where I can completely clean out an area, so this is obviously a life long journey :-D, and I will use every single resource to improve my efficiency. My strategy is dogged determination. I fish as often as possible and look at current conditions in the real time. I change lures frequently and retie each time. All bases are covered and with this strategy fish are caught. The log is a historical account of what happened |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All-American Carp Fishing Forum...a reality at last | PKelly | General Discussion | 0 | May 8th, 2004 01:29 AM |
Volunteers Needed for VT Fishing Program | Outdoors Magazine | General Discussion | 0 | March 4th, 2004 02:59 PM |
Volunteers Needed for VT Fishing Program | Outdoors Magazine | General Discussion | 0 | March 4th, 2004 02:58 PM |
Volunteers Needed for VT "Let's Go Fishing" Program | Outdoors Magazine | Bass Fishing | 0 | March 4th, 2004 02:58 PM |
RECIPROCAL FISHING GOES INTO EFFECT ON LAKE CHAMPLAIN | Outdoors Magazine | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 29th, 2003 03:19 PM |