Talk about the Rep throwing out the Constitution

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:06:08 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Mar 11, 5:35 pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message

...

Neither of those states can compare to the least religious
state in the Union, Vermont.
beat me to it, Ken.
Tom


i concur with my colleague from grunvul.

what forty refers to is "the surpremacy clause".

for one unfortunate example, until recently an individual
previously convicted of a felony could possess a firearm under state
law after a 5 year period following the completion of his sentence or
probationary term. however, if the same person bought a shotgun at
walmart on the first day of his state eligibility, the feds could
successfully prosecute him the next day.

Out of curiosity, what are your feelings toward this:

Let's say that "Montanaho" (or if you prefer, Idatana) passes a law that says
once out of prison, for whatever crime, one is free to buy as many guns as they
wish. So Bubba "The Violent Felon" McQuickonthetrigger gets out light and buys
an arsenal right before moving to, oh, say, right next store to, oh, say, a
random boy lawyer and his family in, oh, say, North Carolina, where such (state)
felons are prohibited from possessing weapons. OK, so now what?

YFCOTGC,
R

he's cooked...but, if he's wayno's neighbor and has a few bucks, it'll
be at a tolerable temperature.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:18:46 -0400, jeff wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:06:08 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Mar 11, 5:35 pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message

...

Neither of those states can compare to the least religious
state in the Union, Vermont.
beat me to it, Ken.
Tom


i concur with my colleague from grunvul.

what forty refers to is "the surpremacy clause".

for one unfortunate example, until recently an individual
previously convicted of a felony could possess a firearm under state
law after a 5 year period following the completion of his sentence or
probationary term. however, if the same person bought a shotgun at
walmart on the first day of his state eligibility, the feds could
successfully prosecute him the next day.

Out of curiosity, what are your feelings toward this:

Let's say that "Montanaho" (or if you prefer, Idatana) passes a law that says
once out of prison, for whatever crime, one is free to buy as many guns as they
wish. So Bubba "The Violent Felon" McQuickonthetrigger gets out light and buys
an arsenal right before moving to, oh, say, right next store to, oh, say, a
random boy lawyer and his family in, oh, say, North Carolina, where such (state)
felons are prohibited from possessing weapons. OK, so now what?

YFCOTGC,
R

he's cooked...but, if he's wayno's neighbor and has a few bucks, it'll
be at a tolerable temperature.

Actually, I was asking about feelings - as in "how it should be" and what the US
Constitution's role might be - rather than the actual law(s) as they currently
stand in NC, but OK...in your (or anyone else reading) opinion, can he still
legally drive in NC with his out-of-state DL, and/or, is he still
married...well, that's a two-parter - suppose he's married to Cindy...and now,
suppose he's married to Bruce...

TC,
R
....and I'm not sure it matters much if the duck if he's confit'ed or
broiled...as far as the duck is concerned, anyhoo...

wrote

Out of curiosity, what are your feelings toward this:

Let's say that "Montanaho" (or if you prefer, Idatana) passes a law that
says
once out of prison, for whatever crime, one is free to buy as many guns
as they
wish. So Bubba "The Violent Felon" McQuickonthetrigger gets out light
and buys
an arsenal right before moving to, oh, say, right next store to, oh,
say, a
random boy lawyer and his family in, oh, say, North Carolina, where such
(state)
felons are prohibited from possessing weapons. OK, so now what?

as jeffie points out, he is "convictable" under either state or federal
law. as to how i feel about that, i would be more upset about my initial
example, wherein the prosecuted individual would be a fellow native tar
heel.

actually, i think local dealers should have all gun purchase and
possession laws, state and fed, posted and read before a transaction.

yfitons
wayno

Outdoors in Oregon wrote:
On Mar 11, 4:31 pm, wrote:
Outdoors in Oregon wrote:
On Mar 10, 4:13 pm, DaveS wrote:

Citizen of the "most unchurched State in the Union"

Them's fightin' words. Washington can bite me, Oregon
is the "most unchurched State in the Union". ;-P

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Oregon

"Out of all U.S. states, Oregon has the highest
percentage of adults who say they are unaffiliated
with any religious tradition."

Huh, whaddyaknow...Washington and Oregon have adults? It has always seemed that
they just have lots of people older than 21...

Now I KNOW this won't help,

...and damn proud of it.

Oregon, Washington, and BC should join together and secede.

http://zapatopi.net/cascadia/

- (the always helpful) JR

On Mar 12, 6:05*pm, JR wrote:
Outdoors in Oregon wrote:
On Mar 11, 4:31 pm, wrote:
Outdoors in Oregon wrote:
On Mar 10, 4:13 pm, DaveS wrote:
Citizen of the "most unchurched State in the Union"
Them's fightin' words. *Washington can bite me, Oregon
is the "most unchurched State in the Union". *;-P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Oregon
"Out of all U.S. states, Oregon has the highest
percentage of adults who say they are unaffiliated
with any religious tradition."
Huh, whaddyaknow...Washington and Oregon have adults? *It has always seemed that
they just have lots of people older than 21...

Now I KNOW this won't help,
...and damn proud of it.

Oregon, Washington, and BC should join together and secede.

http://zapatopi.net/cascadia/

- (the always helpful) JR- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Now you done an gone it. Sunsabitches be sending Marines any time now.
I thought the memo said "pretend wezze still one country? They might
not notice till Spring at soonest and by then Hawaii might sign on."
But noooooooooooo. . . .

Dave

DaveS wrote:
snip
Chasing off Massachusetts White trash in the summer?

snortcough
Huh?!
--
TL,
Tim
(that's "Massholes" to you, buster.)
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:18:46 -0400, jeff wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:06:08 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Mar 11, 5:35 pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message

...

Neither of those states can compare to the least religious
state in the Union, Vermont.
beat me to it, Ken.
Tom

i concur with my colleague from grunvul.

what forty refers to is "the surpremacy clause".

for one unfortunate example, until recently an individual
previously convicted of a felony could possess a firearm under state
law after a 5 year period following the completion of his sentence or
probationary term. however, if the same person bought a shotgun at
walmart on the first day of his state eligibility, the feds could
successfully prosecute him the next day.
Out of curiosity, what are your feelings toward this:

Let's say that "Montanaho" (or if you prefer, Idatana) passes a law that says
once out of prison, for whatever crime, one is free to buy as many guns as they
wish. So Bubba "The Violent Felon" McQuickonthetrigger gets out light and buys
an arsenal right before moving to, oh, say, right next store to, oh, say, a
random boy lawyer and his family in, oh, say, North Carolina, where such (state)
felons are prohibited from possessing weapons. OK, so now what?

YFCOTGC,
R
he's cooked...but, if he's wayno's neighbor and has a few bucks, it'll
be at a tolerable temperature.

Actually, I was asking about feelings - as in "how it should be" and what the US
Constitution's role might be - rather than the actual law(s) as they currently
stand in NC, but OK...in your (or anyone else reading) opinion, can he still
legally drive in NC with his out-of-state DL, and/or, is he still
married...well, that's a two-parter - suppose he's married to Cindy...and now,
suppose he's married to Bruce...

TC,
R
...and I'm not sure it matters much if the duck if he's confit'ed or
broiled...as far as the duck is concerned, anyhoo...

feeeliiings...whoa, whoa, feeeeliiiings...

yeah, i know, too baritone.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:55:55 -0400, jeff wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:18:46 -0400, jeff wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:06:08 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Mar 11, 5:35 pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message

...

Neither of those states can compare to the least religious
state in the Union, Vermont.
beat me to it, Ken.
Tom

i concur with my colleague from grunvul.

what forty refers to is "the surpremacy clause".

for one unfortunate example, until recently an individual
previously convicted of a felony could possess a firearm under state
law after a 5 year period following the completion of his sentence or
probationary term. however, if the same person bought a shotgun at
walmart on the first day of his state eligibility, the feds could
successfully prosecute him the next day.
Out of curiosity, what are your feelings toward this:

Let's say that "Montanaho" (or if you prefer, Idatana) passes a law that says
once out of prison, for whatever crime, one is free to buy as many guns as they
wish. So Bubba "The Violent Felon" McQuickonthetrigger gets out light and buys
an arsenal right before moving to, oh, say, right next store to, oh, say, a
random boy lawyer and his family in, oh, say, North Carolina, where such (state)
felons are prohibited from possessing weapons. OK, so now what?

YFCOTGC,
R
he's cooked...but, if he's wayno's neighbor and has a few bucks, it'll
be at a tolerable temperature.

Actually, I was asking about feelings - as in "how it should be" and what the US
Constitution's role might be - rather than the actual law(s) as they currently
stand in NC, but OK...in your (or anyone else reading) opinion, can he still
legally drive in NC with his out-of-state DL, and/or, is he still
married...well, that's a two-parter - suppose he's married to Cindy...and now,
suppose he's married to Bruce...

TC,
R
...and I'm not sure it matters much if the duck if he's confit'ed or
broiled...as far as the duck is concerned, anyhoo...

feeeliiings...whoa, whoa, feeeeliiiings...

yeah, i know, too baritone.

Naw...too Bruce...

HTH,
R

On Mar 11, 6:05*pm, wrote:

HTH,
R
...any chance of y'all taking Quebec with ya...?



* *- Ken- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You kidding? If they came with us all the pickle jars would have to be
labled in Franche as well as Chinook Trade Jargon and English.
"Skookum, Monsieur, OK? "
That's just too much, hurts my head just saying that much.
No way Josie.
Vive la Québec solo e indépendant. Eh?

Dave