It's looking like Obama/Biden may not finish at all...

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:54:48 -0700, julie wrote:

In article ,
wrote:


Um, Gallop daily tracking is 46-46, and even Zogby, taken over the last
few days, showed Obama ahead early in the period with McCain spiking in
the last three days. IAC, my comment has nothing to do with Obama...

Latest News From Zogby!
Zogby Poll: McCain Recovers as Contest Takes Dramatic Turns; McCain 46%
- Obama 44%...
[ read on ] (9/25/08)


Obama Is LOSING!!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...ebate-victory/

Gee, looks like you are correct!

;-)

julie wrote in news:js-2167CE.11544826092008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com:

Latest News From Zogby!

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/searc...ster%20ratings

Zoby doesn't have a very good rep amongst poll watchers. That's what I
meant by cherry picking.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

"daytripper" wrote in message
...


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...ebate-victory/

I read this group at work during breaks. I don't really want to
have large things like this to my work station , it's even prohibited at
work to download it.

what's it say

THeir fire wall strips most of your emails anyway from the
attachments. This is because it could be a danger to your personal
info such as your ssn and this is done to prevent hackers from
gaining a back door. There are such back doors in many of these
attachements. They seem cute but that's why the hackers input the
hacking tools into the cuter ones.

In this case, something also stripped part of the bears email in my
home account too so I only got to see part of it when I got home,
the firewalls in both places block
that one too.

mk5000

"But it's calm under the waves in the blue of my oblivion
Under the waves in the blue of my oblivion
Under the waves in the blue of my oblivion
It's calm under the waves in the blue of my oblivion"--sullen girl, fiona
apple

http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...ll_update.html

Spin that.

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...ll_update.html

Spin that.

the electoral vote trending looks even more promising....
Tom

daytripper wrote:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...ll_update.html

Spin that.

Remember the Bradley Effect. People lie to pollsters about
voting for black candidates. Most pollsters and political
scientists have pegged the Bradley Effect at around 7%.

Those polls don't look so good to me.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
daytripper wrote:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...ll_update.html

Spin that.

Remember the Bradley Effect. People lie to pollsters about
voting for black candidates. Most pollsters and political
scientists have pegged the Bradley Effect at around 7%.

Those polls don't look so good to me.

--
Ken Fortenberry

sorry, Ken, but you are very much out-of-date. Current estimates, based on
recent elections(post-2000), peg the effect at less than 2%. Further, recent
work by the Pew Study group show that it is very likely that most, if not
all, major polling organizations are undercounting the Obama support by
close to 5%. I can't understand why any Democrat would be scared by current
numbers, beyond the fact that those numbers are merely current, and
gawd-knows-what could happen between now and Nov.4.
Tom

Tom Littleton wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
daytripper wrote:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...ll_update.html

Spin that.
Remember the Bradley Effect. People lie to pollsters about
voting for black candidates. Most pollsters and political
scientists have pegged the Bradley Effect at around 7%.

Those polls don't look so good to me.

sorry, Ken, but you are very much out-of-date. Current estimates, based on
recent elections(post-2000), peg the effect at less than 2%. Further, recent
work by the Pew Study group show that it is very likely that most, if not
all, major polling organizations are undercounting the Obama support by
close to 5%.

I've never been happier to stand corrected.

I can't understand why any Democrat would be scared by current
numbers, beyond the fact that those numbers are merely current, and
gawd-knows-what could happen between now and Nov.4.

Everything scares me, especially the October Surprise I know
is coming.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Sep 24, 7:47*pm, wrote:
Can you say McGovern/Eagleton...

Sheesh,
R

Your dummer that a three year old crowbar. You ain't gonna change
anybodys mind. How many post do you have to turn in before the GOP
will put you on the "favored picke vendors list"?
You should know that statistically McCain won't make 4 years and then
you would have that dumb bitch as president. Can you say "Pat
Rovertson with Nukes"? you can;t sell many of them $25 halilburgers
(with 50 Cent pickle slice on them ) in a glass parking lot.

In article ,
wrote:

Can you say McGovern/Eagleton...

Sheesh,
R

On top of that, unrelated surveys show Obama beating McCain in several
battlegrounds, including Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania -- three states
critical in the state-by-state fight for the presidency.

Several GOP strategists close to McCain's campaign privately fret that
his chances for victory are starting to slip away.

These Republicans, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid angering
the campaign, point to several factors: Obama's gains nationally and in
traditionally GOP states, no McCain gain from the first debate, McCain's
struggles with economic issues as the financial crisis has unfolded and
deepening public skepticism about his running mate, Sarah Palin.

They said McCain's options for shaking up the race are essentially
limited to game-changing performances in the final presidential debates
or in Palin's vice presidential debate with Joe Biden Thursday night.
Short of that, they said, McCain can do little but hope Obama stumbles
or an outside event breaks the GOP nominee's way