waterboarding

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
...
You're a hoot and a half Your Loony Mikeness.

Carry on.

Unfortunately for you. snip

Your bigotry and ignorance is recorded on Google and few here
need be reminded of your disgusting homophobic commentary.

It is interesting that a hate-filled Nazi type such as yourself
would presume to lecture anyone on "basic human rights".

As if.

But you're my three dollar banjo so I'm sure you'll ...

Carry on.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Dec 31, 1:43 am, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
...
You're a hoot and a half Your Loony Mikeness.

Carry on.

Unfortunately for you. snip

Your bigotry and ignorance is recorded on Google and few here
need be reminded of your disgusting homophobic commentary.

It is interesting that a hate-filled Nazi type such as yourself
would presume to lecture anyone on "basic human rights".

As if.

But you're my three dollar banjo so I'm sure you'll ...

Carry on.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Once again you reinforce what I wrote. You and LaCourse have become
pariahs and a laughing stock on this newsgroup. Richly deserved I
might add.

MC

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
...
You're a hoot and a half Your Loony Mikeness.
Carry on.
Unfortunately for you. snip
Your bigotry and ignorance is recorded on Google and few here
need be reminded of your disgusting homophobic commentary.

Once again you reinforce what I wrote. ...

LOL !! Is *that* what I did ?

You're a hoot and three quarters Your Loony Mikeness.

Carry on.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Mike wrote:

Once again you reinforce what I wrote. You and LaCourse have become
pariahs and a laughing stock on this newsgroup. Richly deserved I
might add.

LaCourse and Fortenberry has a curious and telling thing in common.
They're prone to insult someone (me, for example) as being "gay" or
"effeminate."

Anyone who is honest and who knows me personally, and there are several
in ROFF who do, knows that I'm neither gay nor effeminate. My two
daughters, my wife, and my girlfriend would also back that up.

But I don't have to defend myself from the likes of those two. LaCourse
and Fortenberry have to defend themselves for their gratuitous,
homophobic, insulting behavior. It might be caused by doubts about their
own masculinity, or it might be caused by pure pigheaded meanness. Or both.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
LaCourse and Fortenberry has a curious and telling thing in common.
They're prone to insult someone (me, for example) as being "gay" or
"effeminate." ...

I've never called you "gay" and my calling you "effeminate" is an
accurate observation, you are effeminate right down to your squeaky
little whine. That's why your rough, tough Idaho cowboy shtick is
so hilarious to anyone who has actually met you.

If being called effeminate is so offensive to you as to be insulting
when you are, in fact, effeminate then I would suggest that *you* are
the one who has serious doubts about his own masculinity.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Dec 30, 5:14*pm, rw wrote:
Mike wrote:

Once again you reinforce what I wrote. You and LaCourse have become
pariahs and a laughing stock on this newsgroup. Richly deserved I
might add.

LaCourse and Fortenberry has a curious and telling thing in common.
They're prone to insult someone (me, for example) as being "gay" or
"effeminate."

Anyone who is honest and who knows me personally, and there are several
in ROFF who do, knows that I'm neither gay nor effeminate. My two
daughters, my wife, and my girlfriend would also back that up.

But I don't have to defend myself from the likes of those two. LaCourse
and Fortenberry have to defend themselves for their gratuitous,
homophobic, insulting behavior. It might be caused by doubts about their
own masculinity, or it might be caused by pure pigheaded meanness. Or both..

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Larry Craig use to say quite a few things about gays and sinner. A
lot of then are in the Cogtressional Record. However if were in the
stall next to him it was a different tune.

BJ Conner wrote:
Larry Craig use to say quite a few things about gays and sinner. A
lot of then are in the Cogtressional Record. However if were in the
stall next to him it was a different tune.

Some folks would say your Larry Craig example explains a good deal
about His Loony Mikeness' vociferous, totally out of the blue attack
on gays in this forum. In fact some folks *did* say exactly that at
the time.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Dec 31, 2:14 am, rw wrote:
Mike wrote:

Once again you reinforce what I wrote. You and LaCourse have become
pariahs and a laughing stock on this newsgroup. Richly deserved I
might add.

LaCourse and Fortenberry has a curious and telling thing in common.
They're prone to insult someone (me, for example) as being "gay" or
"effeminate."

Anyone who is honest and who knows me personally, and there are several
in ROFF who do, knows that I'm neither gay nor effeminate. My two
daughters, my wife, and my girlfriend would also back that up.

But I don't have to defend myself from the likes of those two. LaCourse
and Fortenberry have to defend themselves for their gratuitous,
homophobic, insulting behavior. It might be caused by doubts about their
own masculinity, or it might be caused by pure pigheaded meanness. Or both..

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.


Indeed, being insulted or defamed by one or both of them is more or
less the norm for the sensible and civilised people here. Neither of
them has any credibility left, so whatever they say is worthless
anyway, but it is often frustrating nevertheless.

Unfortunately, for quite a long time, I simply did not grasp that I
had no need to defend myself against such, and I got very upset,
frustrated, and annoyed by it. rather damaging my own reputation in
the process. Shame that, but one is always cleverer with hindsight. If
somebody called me a Nazi here where I live for instance, ( which is
as unlikely as winning three times running in the lotto!), he would
be on the deck about three seconds later, and he would also lose in
court as a direct result of using such an epithet.

In the meantime, with Fortenberry, it´s just totally laughable. One
minute he is ranting on about homophobes, or racist epithets and stuff
like that, and the next he is calling people gays, racists,.homos,
nazis, and such.

He is not only a fanatical and totally inconsistent bigot, and a
pathological liar, he is also apparently too stupid to realise it.

Maybe it´s because he doesn´t know much about fishing, and apart from
football and ranting on about other people he simply has nothing else
to say?.

Whatever, it is no longer any real concern of mine, there is no point
in even taking any notice of it. Obviously there is nothing much to be
done about it.

TL
MC

Mike wrote:
Indeed, being insulted or defamed by one or both of them is more or
less the norm for the sensible and civilised people here. ...

Actually, the gold standard of insults, the one sure way sensible
folks know they're every bit the "expert" fly fisherman as any
other roffian is to be labeled "Dumbo" by His Loony Mikeness.

I just wish I had the T-shirt. LOL !!

--
Ken Fortenberry

Mike wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:14 am, rw wrote:

Mike wrote:


Once again you reinforce what I wrote. You and LaCourse have become
pariahs and a laughing stock on this newsgroup. Richly deserved I
might add.

LaCourse and Fortenberry has a curious and telling thing in common.
They're prone to insult someone (me, for example) as being "gay" or
"effeminate."

Anyone who is honest and who knows me personally, and there are several
in ROFF who do, knows that I'm neither gay nor effeminate. My two
daughters, my wife, and my girlfriend would also back that up.

But I don't have to defend myself from the likes of those two. LaCourse
and Fortenberry have to defend themselves for their gratuitous,
homophobic, insulting behavior. It might be caused by doubts about their
own masculinity, or it might be caused by pure pigheaded meanness. Or both.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.



Indeed, being insulted or defamed by one or both of them is more or
less the norm for the sensible and civilised people here. Neither of
them has any credibility left, so whatever they say is worthless
anyway, but it is often frustrating nevertheless.

Unfortunately, for quite a long time, I simply did not grasp that I
had no need to defend myself against such, and I got very upset,
frustrated, and annoyed by it. rather damaging my own reputation in
the process.

That shows to me, Mike, an insightful look into your troubled
personality. Admit it. Life on Usenet (ROFF in particular) isn't like
real life. Get used to it.

The only effective way to deal with these clowns is to laugh at them.

BTW, I have a laughable photo of Fortenberry in his pear-shaped-body
glory, getting ready to jump into the dreaded borrowed belly boat at
Grinder Lake.

It's funny. He was like a duck in room-temperature bowl of gelatin --
barely made it to the fishing spot at the inlet, and then complained the
whole time. Left early. What a wimp.

I'm tempted to post it on abpf. No requests, please. It's too cruel,
even for me.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.