2 wt fly line

Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be used on bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Are you interested in a used one?

--


---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"

Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com


"Tom Church" wrote in message
...
Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be used on
bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Tom Church wrote in :

Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be
used on bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)

.....mirror mirror on the wall....tell ya what bro', build me one of them
cute little 2 wts and i'll *give* you an *expensive* 2 wt line, new, still
in the box. izzat a deal or what? seriously, i just spent what seemed like
hours checking for 2 wt lines (including ebay) and found nothing under 40
bucks. at this point, cabelas has the "cheapest" at $39.95...it's their
house brand Prestige line, which i have used successfully on many a
smallmouth g just goes to show that nothing is too good for my little
brother.

Frank Church
...the older and wiser one (if ya can't baffle 'em with your bull****,
dazzle 'em with your footwork...

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:23:21 GMT, Tom Church wrote:

Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be used on bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)

Any problem going up to a 3? I went through this same thing in July
(the 2wt search) and there ain't much out there, but a buddy had one he
offered as backup, so I just took what I had. I tried a 3, just to see,
and didn't notice much difference (on a 6' 6" 2wt).

TC,
R

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:23:21 GMT, Tom Church wrote:

Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be used on bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)

Any problem going up to a 3? I went through this same thing in July
(the 2wt search) and there ain't much out there, but a buddy had one he
offered as backup, so I just took what I had. I tried a 3, just to see,
and didn't notice much difference (on a 6' 6" 2wt).

TC,
R

wrote in news:viqtl0d8p8cfsfjmlfvjh856puchhgbtei@
4ax.com:

....good point..if the rod will take a 3 wt there are tons of choices out
there. tom, if you can, wait till i get down there next month or dec. and
i'll bring a #3 line for you to try.

the older and wiser frank

Hi Tom,

About 90% of all 2 weight rods would work better with a 3 weight line.

Look for some on close-out or on ebay. WF3F

If they make the SA/Mastery "Head Start" in a WF3F then that would be a good
line becuase it has shorter tapers that would be better for panfish flies.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA, USA

Web site: www.kiene.com


"Tom Church" wrote in message
...

Does anyone have a recommendation for a inexpensive 2wt line to be used on
bluegills.

Tom Church
(the good looking Church)




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Bill Kiene wrote:

About 90% of all 2 weight rods would work better with a 3 weight line.

In other words, a fair number of 3-weight rods are mislabeled as
2-weights. Golly. The "industry" better get on the ball and mislabel
more 3-weight lines as 2-weight, or the suck..., uh, customers are going
to start thinking they're being had...

JR

Bill Kiene wrote:

About 90% of all 2 weight rods would work better with a 3 weight line.

In other words, a fair number of 3-weight rods are mislabeled as
2-weights. Golly. The "industry" better get on the ball and mislabel
more 3-weight lines as 2-weight, or the suck..., uh, customers are going
to start thinking they're being had...

JR

JR wrote:
Bill Kiene wrote:

About 90% of all 2 weight rods would work better with a 3 weight line.


In other words, a fair number of 3-weight rods are mislabeled as
2-weights. Golly. The "industry" better get on the ball and mislabel
more 3-weight lines as 2-weight, or the suck..., uh, customers are going
to start thinking they're being had...

JR




As a consumer I think the pattern of not following the standards that have
been accepted for a long time, sucks. With flylines, this is getting to be
somewhat commonplace. For example, some lines sold as 5 weights are
not 5 weights based on the standard. Maybe this is starting with rods too.

It seems ironic, based on what PC reported: spey casters are trying to
establish a standard to make things less confusing, the "regular" fly
gear industry is ignoring established standards and things are getting
muddled.

Willi