Yellowstone Oil Spill

On Jul 10, 4:59*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
Bob wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
I wouldn't expect a Swiftboating ****-weasel to be swayed by facts.
If you could be swayed by facts you wouldn't be a Swiftboating
****-weasel in the first place. I will spell it out for you anyway.

Your misinformation post inferred that the flooding was a "good"
thing because it would disperse the oil spill and send it downstream.
In actual fact the flooding is *a "bad" thing because it spread the
oil into fragile wetlands, marshes and low-lying areas which would
not have been affected were it not for the flooding.

Your post was dumbass bull**** and misinformation to boot. You have
no idea what the hell you're talking about and when confronted with
actual fact you revert to personal attack just like the nasty little
Swiftboating ****-weasel you really are.

The careful reader will find no misinformation in this post. * LOL !!

I know I said that I was bailing out of this thread, ...

but my post hit home and hit home HARD so you've got to say
something, anything, no matter how ridiculous in a futile
and pathetic attempt to save face.

Save your breath, ****-weasel.

--
Ken Fortenberry

BWAHAHAHA Truly hilarious. I don't think I've ever met anyone who
had as high an opinion of themselves or their effectiveness - with so
little cause - as you. TaTa