If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:04:10 -0600, Barney Fife
wrote: http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=650 Isn't this the case with most rivers in built up areas in the US? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
A User wrote:
Barney Fife wrote: http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=650 Isn't this the case with most rivers in built up areas in the US? yep. people see a river as a place to toss stuff they no longer want. cities dump their sewage in rivers. I LOL at how Chicago dumps their treated sewage in the same lake they take their drinking water from. I LOL at Raleigh for allowing homes with open septic drain fields on land around Falls lake where Raleigh takes their drinking water from. sad these things are but LOL is better than crying since neither will change how big money is ruining this planet. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
Jim Ledford wrote in news:44039637.A15C8C21
@bellsouth.net: snip I LOL at how Chicago dumps their treated sewage in the same lake they take their drinking water from. snip Well, laughingboy, water discharged from a properly designed and operated waste treatment plant is cleaner than the water drawn out of many open lakes in the United States. Chicago's Metropolitan Sanitary District (MSD) is such a waste treatment operation. In fact, MSD could bottle it, sell it to you, and you'd never know. If you want pure virgin water you need to get hydrogen and oxygen and combine them by burning. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:26:14 -0500, Sheldon Harper
wrote: Jim Ledford wrote in news:44039637.A15C8C21 : snip I LOL at how Chicago dumps their treated sewage in the same lake they take their drinking water from. snip Well, laughingboy, water discharged from a properly designed and operated waste treatment plant is cleaner than the water drawn out of many open lakes in the United States. Chicago's Metropolitan Sanitary District (MSD) is such a waste treatment operation. In fact, MSD could bottle it, sell it to you, and you'd never know. If you want pure virgin water you need to get hydrogen and oxygen and combine them by burning. I would know, as I did the experiment. I took tap water from lake Michigan and filled a tall clear bottle with it. I then put it in a place where it wouldn't be disturbed for 72 hours. After that time, I took the bottle and looked at the bottom, where a thick brown sediment had settled. My best guess is that is human fecal material at the bottom of the bottle. Invisible at first because it is in suspension, but given the opportunity for gravity to work on it, the accumulation is quite pronounced, and of the appropriate brown color. As far as dissolved chemicals are concerned, they remained in solution. I attack both problems with sediment and activated carbon filters. I know someone who died from cancer...her doctor said it was most likely from drinking the water ( Steger Illinois, which I think is/was wellwater until we got a feed from Lake Michigan through a Chicago Heights distribution station ). In summary, I would not feed tap water to a stray DOG, without first filtering it through sediment and activated carbon/charcoal filters to remove _most_ of the impurities. There remains the *heavy metals* problem, but those filters are way way expensive. Activated carbon/charcoal with a pre-filter for sediment provides a Good Return on Investment (ROI). I have two of them in series, for drinking water purposes only. Nobody at this house drinks water from any source that isn't first filtered with my own equipment. Lg Chicago ( far South Side ) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
..
I would know, as I did the experiment. I took tap water from lake Michigan and filled a tall clear bottle with it. I then put it in a place where it wouldn't be disturbed for 72 hours. After that time, I took the bottle and looked at the bottom, where a thick brown sediment had settled. My best guess is that is human fecal material at the bottom of the bottle. LOL. your "best guess"? you just made that up. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
In article ,
Lawrence Glickman wrote: I would know, as I did the experiment. I took tap water from lake Michigan and filled a tall clear bottle with it. I then put it in a place where it wouldn't be disturbed for 72 hours. After that time, I took the bottle and looked at the bottom, where a thick brown sediment had settled. My best guess is that is human fecal material at the bottom of the bottle. I'm guessing iron. I'd bet money against visible organic matter if the water actually came out of a municipally-supplied tap. Without proper collection, storage and testing (all of which are a genuine pain in the keister), an experiment such as yours tells you one thing: "there's a brown precipitate in the water." Our tap water comes from a private well. On occasion, it is brown or blood-**** colored. At first, I too thought it might be some kind of fertilizer. We live in a rural area, after all. So, I went online and found out how to collect tap water for testing. Collected it, stored it and took it to a commercial testing facility where (after paying $50 per sample) we found out our worries were unwarranted. It was just a heavy concentration of iron, common in the midwest. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fish Down Stream 3M Ssite On Mississippi River Unsafe
Lawrence Glickman wrote:
[....] Jim Ledford wrote: snip I LOL at how Chicago dumps their treated sewage in the same lake they take their drinking water from. [....] I would know, as I did the experiment. I took tap water from lake Michigan and filled a tall clear bottle with it. I then put it in a place where it wouldn't be disturbed for 72 hours. After that time, I took the bottle and looked at the bottom, where a thick brown sediment had settled. My best guess is that is human fecal material at the bottom of the bottle. Invisible at first because it is in suspension, but given the opportunity for gravity to work on it, the accumulation is quite pronounced, and of the appropriate brown color. As far as dissolved chemicals are concerned, they remained in solution. I attack both problems with sediment and activated carbon filters. I know someone who died from cancer...her doctor said it was most likely from drinking the water ( Steger Illinois, which I think is/was wellwater until we got a feed from Lake Michigan through a Chicago Heights distribution station ). In summary, I would not feed tap water to a stray DOG, without first filtering it through sediment and activated carbon/charcoal filters to remove _most_ of the impurities. There remains the *heavy metals* problem, but those filters are way way expensive. Activated carbon/charcoal with a pre-filter for sediment provides a Good Return on Investment (ROI). I have two of them in series, for drinking water purposes only. Nobody at this house drinks water from any source that isn't first filtered with my own equipment. Lg Chicago ( far South Side ) Lg - smart person, good job for your work. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Should General Discussion assess the sniff? An analogue thinks? The acid coughs over an office. General Discussion hammers the prince within your specialist chalk. Next to the designer reaches the restriction finger.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Ephorons and Antaeus TR | George Cleveland | Fly Fishing | 13 | September 3rd, 2004 07:45 PM |
San Juan and the Fish Pimp | bruiser | Fly Fishing | 22 | December 13th, 2003 11:38 PM |
Fish much smarter than we imagined | John | General Discussion | 14 | October 8th, 2003 10:39 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | General Discussion | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | UK Sea Fishing | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |