vote no on "BO"
 

On 3 Nov 2008 22:28:57 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Wow-- I hope I see the day when all that particular nastiness disappears.
Maybe that's only 90 days away!!

If Obama wins, the nastiness will *really* begin.

vote no on "BO"
 

On Nov 3, 2:06*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:

Yawn. *I'll take all of that before I take a born muslim (who
practiced it in Indonesian, who has Communist mentors, terrorists as
friends, pro PLO anti-Israeli buds, crooks as financial buddies, a
minister who hates America and its white population, and a wife who
has never been proud to be an American and who is a racist.

Oh give it a rest. Did McCain complain about the Vietnamese POW food?
No. "Sam" hoc Phan says he ate every last drop. He liked it. Did his
torturers smash his dick? No. He got away with his dick in-****ing-
tact. Did his torturers butt-plug him? We really do not know. But, I
ask you this. . . Would he be running for Prez if it were not for his
Vietnamese torturers? No way. And think about those torturers. I bet
they have some juicy McCain stories. But hey; you don't hear them
running down Obama do you? Well do you? So why the **** are you making
all this **** up. I thought you were just crowing about living with
it.

I've told you what Obama has done, and tomorrow hopefully his lifelist
will include beating the old guy.
I understand that you support McCain for your own reasons, however
convoluted and Jesus-hating they might be, but would you still support
McCain if he were a child molesting, transvestite with no real style
sense whatsoever?

Dave
I have it on good intel that McCain took God's name in vain many
times.

vote no on "BO"
 

DaveS wrote in news:627f8b61-7da5-439f-9702-
:

No. He got away with his dick in-****ing-
tact.

Are you referring to this?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...rs-could-face-
trial-in-britain-over-torture-allegations-980384.html

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

vote no on "BO"
 

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
snip
I was born in Landstuhl, Germany to U.S. citizen parents,
my dad was an Air Force Sergeant at the time. I have a
German birth certificate issued at my birth in 1956 and
Naturalization papers from the U.S. State Department issued
in 1958.

Oh, gawd! You're not running for office, are you?! Talk about goin' ta hell
in a handbasket.
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

vote no on "BO"
 

DaveS wrote:

1. McCain wrecked 3 planes. At least 2 were judged to have happened
due to recklessness.
2. Why did McCain, the son of an Admiral, etc, never get a sea
command. You know why.
3. McCain's womenizing.
4. McCain's drinking and party habits as a lobbyist for the Navy. He
was a real prick.
5. McCain's rogue betrayal of Navy decisions on procurement while he
was their representative in D.C.
6. McCain's ignorance of the basic geography and economy of even his
home State of Arizona.
7. McCain's health issues, which go far beyond the skin cancer.
8. McCain's failure to clean up his wife's drug related tax mess.

You forgot to mention the binge gambling.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

vote no on "BO"
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:32 -0800 (PST), DaveS
wrote:


Yawn. I'll take all of that before I take a born muslim (who
practiced it in Indonesian, who has Communist mentors, terrorists as
friends, pro PLO anti-Israeli buds, crooks as financial buddies, a
minister who hates America and its white population, and a wife who
has never been proud to be an American and who is a racist.

Can you answer what has Obama done? McCain has been serving his
country continuously since before Obama was born. WHAT has Obama done
for me, for you, for America? Nothing! He can read a teleprompter
pretty well....... that's about it.

Dave



I never tire of seeing this. It happens over and over. These political
threads get LaCourse wound up tighter than a virgin's daughter.
Eventually, SPROING!

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

vote no on "BO"
 

On Nov 3, 4:07*pm, rw wrote:
DaveS wrote:

1. McCain wrecked 3 planes. At least 2 were judged to have happened
due to recklessness.
2. Why did McCain, the son of an Admiral, etc, never get a sea
command. You know why.
3. McCain's womanizing.
4. McCain's drinking and party habits as a lobbyist for the Navy. He
was a real prick.
5. McCain's rogue betrayal of Navy decisions on procurement while he
was their representative in D.C.
6. McCain's ignorance of the basic geography and economy of even his
home State of Arizona.
7. McCain's health issues, which go far beyond the skin cancer.
8. McCain's failure to clean up his wife's drug related tax mess.

You forgot to mention the binge gambling.


I know. Wasn't that about how he won his African-American love child?
In a card game?

Oh, have I got this whole thing wrong or what? This is a list of the
nasty stuff the BUSH Campaign ran against McCain! I guess the Ds
didn't want to infringe on the RNCs copyrights. After all aren't the
Rs all about honor and stuff?

Dave
Heehaw, heehaw, hee haw

vote no on "BO"
 

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On 3 Nov 2008 22:28:57 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Wow-- I hope I see the day when all that particular nastiness disappears.
Maybe that's only 90 days away!!

If Obama wins, the nastiness will *really* begin.



how so, David?
Tom

vote no on "BO"
 

On Nov 3, 2:25*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
"DaveS" wrote in message

...
But Dave, do you think Cindy McCain will use her position in the
Whitehouse to get large amounts of narcotics like she did with her
"medical charity?"

good Gawd, Snedeker, aim higher! Do you have any idea of the level and
quality of pharmaceuticals that the government has a hold of?? Narcotics?
That woman could find Nirvana if only her husband hadn't just run one of the
worst campaigns in modern history.......
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom

Hold on there . . . maybe SHE was stealing the drugs for HIM. You know
the pain and all? It could happen. Look, there is the case of Rush
Limberg. He needed the drugs for his anal warts, not by the way
contracted in the usual way anal warts are contracted, but from
something much more ah, hetero, like driving a jeep too much or like
that. Not like Karl Rove might have contracted his anal warts. And the
drugs were for the pain. You heathen hear? the Pain...

Dave

vote no on "BO"
 

On 3 Nov 2008 22:21:09 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:


Frank, he is eligible to serve as POSTUS. If you think he isn't, you
are reaching for straws.

Why hasn't the DNC filed papers against him?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us.../28mccain.html has a great
review on this, and its not as clear as you seem to think.

It's clear. The term "natural born" as used in the US Constitution,
does not mean born within the boundaries of the US as they exist at any
given moment, nor does it even elude to geography. It means a "citizen
at birth," as opposed to "naturalized citizen" or other form of "created
citizen" from one who held prior foreign citizenship. Through at least
two Federal laws, The Naturalization Act of 1795 and the law that made
Panama Canal births to US citizens, citizens (even retroactively), and a
whole body of clear legislative intent, McCain was a US citizen at
birth.

It hasn't been
pursued just because of a sort of gentleman's agreement

It hasn't been pursued because there is nothing to pursue, and the only
people who have standing to pursue it, Congress, know as a body there is
nothing to pursue (individuals, etc., don't have standing in the case of
the POTUS).

HTH,
R
-- a can of worms over a technicality. A contest would probably result in a SC decision in
favor of "natural born"

Then again, bringing it up might actually have resulted in the GOP fielding
a candidate who had a chance of winning, and we wouldn't want that!