Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On 12 Apr 2007 07:20:06 -0700, wrote:

On Apr 12, 4:01 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:45:09 GMT, "rb608"

wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
P.S. to Joe F., I *told* you the "diaper insult" was gonna
be the next big thing.

Gotta give you that one. My guess was the overuse of the nickname for
Richard. That one had real potential. :-)

Naw, he never insults anyone personally...

TC,
R, er, Dickie



Joe F.

You are not real enough to insult personally dickie boy, you are a
very good caricature of a filthy degenerate pig. I told you I would
watch you pull the rug
out from under your own feet, and I will. Not even the dumbos like
being held in such contempt. Hell it gets them upset when one points
out their failings in English. I have no doubt some are beginning to
harbour feelings of dislike for you, real or not. The effect will be
the same.

"BEGINNING TO!?" ****, I must be slipping...I'd bet there are at least
_some_ that dislike me with a passion well beyond reason. And I'll
worry about that about as much as I worry about you...hee-hee-hee...

Dickie

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On 12-Apr-2007, Scott Seidman wrote:

Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply


That is exactly what I have said several times on this list
I even called hiim a "fat creep"

Fred

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On Apr 12, 10:30 pm, "Tim J."
wrote:
riverman typed:

An open letter to the current participants in the interminable uproar
on ROFF:

This is getting nuts. Someone GROW UP for gods sake. There's an easy
opportunity to win this unwinnable war. Who will be the first to see
it?

Maybe - just perhaps - if people just quit posting these "Rethinking" posts,
it would just go away and die its natural death. But, hey, whaddaiknow?
--
TL,
Tim
who never rethinks, and is pretty much a novice to thinking in general.
-------------------------http://css.sbcma.com/timj


Hmm, but yet here you are, posting to a rethinking post.
:-)

--riverman

That was my one post on this subject since its gone nulyoular and my
this is my last. Against all my morals, I am going to have to kill-
file a friend of mine, because I cannot support where he has gone.

Another newsgroup had a similar flame war, and the regulars used to
change the subject headings so that folks could filter threads easier,
not only to avoid posts by the perpetrators, but even discussions
about it. I suggest we do the same here.

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On 12 Apr 2007 07:15:01 -0700, wrote:

Hope LaCourse is paying attention here, so he knows exactly how you
consider and treat people.

He's giving what he's taking. I told you a long time ago to forget it
and move on with your life. Fortenberry is correct: everything you
say here is in the archives for anyone to google. You care about your
internet reputation, obviously, but Fortenberry and Richard do not
care about theirs. It is the internet, for gawds sake. It isn't
real. And now you have made available in its archives some of the
most whackiest and hateful words ever seen here on roff. YOU have
made your reputation, not Fortenberry or Dean or anyone else. Those
are YOUR words recorded for all to see. It doesn't matter what was
done to YOU, but how you reacted to it. And, it ain't good news.
Your actions and reaction remind me of Sisyphus.

Scotl is also correct. Your action to try and end roff are those of a
little creep. You will never succeed, but will spend your every
lasting days trying to. That is the action of a psychotic.

People on roff used to have a great respect for you, Mike, but that is
all but gone now. I wish you no illwill or hold anything against you,
but I must say that you have changed over the years. I think you need
to step back, take a look at what has happened and what you are trying
to do and let reality set in. Stop this insane nonsense. Only you
can do that.

Dave

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On 12-Apr-2007, Ken Fortenberry wrote:

You're ****ing into the wind though, you know. When His Loony
Mikeness created the gaggle of sockpuppets he went way beyond
sane and reasonable and crossed the line into psychosis. You
cannot reason with a madman. His Loony Mikeness has embarrassed
himself here irreparably and his insane ego demands that he
continue his lunatic attempts to render this forum useless for
everyone. He has stated as much on several occasions and his
recent flurry of posting confirms his intentions.

I'm afraid nothing can be done except ignore his lunatic rantings
or play a little "poke the silly homophobe" now and then.

--
Ken Fortenberry

You are not all there either buddy!
You obviously like to provoke him and other people
In other words
You are a bit of a ****tard yourself

Fred

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On Apr 12, 12:24 am, JR wrote:
riverman wrote:
.......
No one can say "well, ____ should do it because they are wrong."
Everyone is wrong, because the wrongness of this whole mess is not
about homophobia, or fighting unjust causes with just or unjust means;
the wrongness of this whole mess is that the gang warfare here is
ruining ROFF for many people; lurkers and old-timers. We will never
resolve the former, we can only resolve the latter.

It must have occurred to you that for at least one of the
protagonists, ruining roff might in fact *be* the objective.

- JR

Might? I thought that was his stated objective?

We've seen worse, the little I see is so sad it's
humorous.
- Ken

it all again, again...
 

"riverman" wrote in message
Against all my morals, I am going to have to kill-
file a friend of mine, because I cannot support where he has gone.

Please don't kill file me, I'll change. Really. :-)

Honestly, it's a tough spot. Having met quite a few of these reprobates,
interacted with others here for nigh on a decade, and forged these virtual
friendships, it's disheartening to see someone behave contrary to what we
thought we knew of them.

Joe F.

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

Dave LaCourse wrote:

... You care about your
internet reputation, obviously, but Fortenberry and Richard do not
care about theirs. ...

You know Louie, somebody who goes out on a date with a goat
named Mildred has no business talking about the reputations
of others. ;-)

--
Ken Fortenberry

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

Rethinking it all again, again...
 

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:39:22 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

You know Louie, somebody who goes out on a date with a goat
named Mildred has no business talking about the reputations
of others. ;-)

roflmao. Correct you are. Mildred's husband died just before
Christmas. When Joanne and I were in Georgia last month, we stopped
by to see her in Franklin, NC. She is still just as lovely as she was
50 years ago when I was engaged to her. We had a nice visit.