Fishing - vote no on "BO"

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)

- Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)

- - vote no on "BO" (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=32916)

On Nov 3, 4:07*pm, rw wrote:
DaveS wrote:

1. McCain wrecked 3 planes. At least 2 were judged to have happened
due to recklessness.
2. Why did McCain, the son of an Admiral, etc, never get a sea
command. You know why.
3. McCain's womenizing.
4. McCain's drinking and party habits as a lobbyist for the Navy. He
was a real prick.
5. McCain's rogue betrayal of Navy decisions on procurement while he
was their representative in D.C.
6. McCain's ignorance of the basic geography and economy of even his
home State of Arizona.
7. McCain's health issues, which go far beyond the skin cancer.
8. McCain's failure to clean up his wife's drug related tax mess.

You forgot to mention the binge gambling.

True

Now that the election is almost here its probably not a smear if I
mention that McCain's class ranking at Annapolis was 894th out of 899
midshipmen? So what I cannot figure is how he qualified for flight
training? Maybe same way that GW did? Daddypoints?

I'd have figured he would have been steered into a fine but short
career in recreational logistics at one of those military and DOD only
resorts.

Dave

John spent more time in a prision camp than barrack hussein
obaba is/has been a senator.....a bit of a mis match there in
expierence...

On Nov 3, 3:34*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 3 Nov 2008 22:28:57 GMT, Scott Seidman

wrote:
Wow-- I hope I see the day when all that particular nastiness disappears.. *
Maybe that's only 90 days away!!

If Obama wins, the nastiness will *really* begin. *

wrote in
:

It hasn't been pursued because there is nothing to pursue, and the only
people who have standing to pursue it, Congress, know as a body there
is
nothing to pursue (individuals, etc., don't have standing in the case
of
the POTUS).

http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/pryor_note.pdf

I'm thrilled that your armchair analysis has yielded an opinion much
clearer than a Constitutional lawyer who obviously spent weeks to months
credibly thinking on and researching the matter, who opines that there
are historical differences between naturalized and native born, and that
only some interpretations would provide a conclusion of presidential
eligiblity.

Thanks for clearing that up for us.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On Nov 3, 5:42*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
John spent more time in a prision camp than barrack hussein
obaba is/has been a senator.....a bit of a mis match there in
expierence...

- Show quoted text -

First name basis. Wow. You seem to know a lot about McCain. Has the
man ever earned a paycheck from anything but the government? You know,
8 hours for 8 hours of pay? Ever? Why not? Just about everybody has
worked some sort of job outside of government sometime right? Has he
ever paid for his own health insurance? . . . paid for his kids
medical care? Paid his own college tuition? Paid for his own airline
ticket? Ever?

You know a lot about him.Fill us in please.

Dave

wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:04:57 -0500, Dave LaCourse wrote:

My gawd, Frank. Not you. McCain was born in the Canal Zone, a
legitimate part of Panama that belong to the U.S. Besides, he was born
to a member of the U.S. Military, so regardless *where* he was born, he
is a native born citizen of the U.S.

Not necessarily.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us...11mccain.html?
_r=1&oref=slogin

Regardless, the courts are not going to touch these cases. There have
been 3 or 4 cases regarding Obama's citizenship, all have been
dismissed. There have also been several regarding McCain's citizenship,
also dismissed.

It's a democracy. Do you really want a judge to limit candidacy?

Actually it is a Representative Republic.

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:51:29 -0600, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Like Frank said, it's never been put to the test and as
usual what you lack in knowledge you make up for with
certitude.

... It has been reported that
Obama's own fraternal grandmother said he was born in Kenya. ...

I tried to warn you about wandering around outside without
your tin foil hat.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

Please! No more facts. You are confusing people.

Steve A

On 4 Nov 2008 01:47:51 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

wrote in
:

It hasn't been pursued because there is nothing to pursue, and the only
people who have standing to pursue it, Congress, know as a body there
is
nothing to pursue (individuals, etc., don't have standing in the case
of
the POTUS).

http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/pryor_note.pdf

I'm thrilled that your armchair analysis has yielded an opinion much
clearer than a Constitutional lawyer who obviously spent weeks to months
credibly thinking on and researching the matter, who opines that there
are historical differences between naturalized and native born, and that
only some interpretations would provide a conclusion of presidential
eligiblity.

I'm more than passingly familiar with most of what's in that, and your
argument that "some interpretations" would provide this or that is
nonsense. "Some interpretations" provide that Obama is a secret Muslim,
that Elvis is alive and well and having a donut at Dunkin' with Jimi
Hendrix and a guy from Venus and that you know of what you speak. One
can make whatever academic arguments one wishes, even interesting ones,
and make all sorts of arguendo "ifs," but they are ultimately without
merit because the Constitution, its meaning and the law are all in clear
agreement.

And if you'll actually read your own cite, you'll find that she says the
same thing. I feel no need to apologize for not needing "weeks to
months" to determine such a clear Constitutional matter. Further, that
article shouldn't have taken more than a day or two, and as far as
McCain, a lot of what the article covers could have been ignored - he
isn't an American Indian born on a reservation prior to 1982, his
parents were US citizens at their births with permanent residence in the
US, he has undoubtedly met the residency requirements, he was never a
citizen of another nation, etc., etc., etc.

You are perfectly free to be as wrong as you wish, but the answer to the
question of McCain being a "natural born citizen" under and as intended
by the US Constitution for the purposes of eligibility for the office of
POTUS is clear - he is a "natural born citizen."

Thanks for clearing that up for us.

You're welcome,
R

On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:24:01 -0800 (PST), DaveS
wrote:

I've told you what Obama has done, and tomorrow hopefully his lifelist
will include beating the old guy.
I understand that you support McCain for your own reasons, however
convoluted and Jesus-hating they might be, but would you still support
McCain if he were a child molesting, transvestite with no real style
sense whatsoever?

First off, David, McCain wasn't my first or second choice. He has
****ed me off over the years on how he's voted. He is, however, the
best choice this time around, as was Bush the last two times, as was
Clinton the last two times before that. Child molesting trasvestite?
What the hell are you talking about? I would NOT vote for him if he
had ties with a sympathizer of the PLO, buddies with a communist and a
terrorist, and went to a church where the pastor was not only
anti-white, but anti-US and he actively supported that pastor. The
man has done nothing, David, nothing. He's been running for postus
for two years - that is the only thing he has done. He is as
qualified for the WH as Palin is, and with all the **** that has come
out of the mouth of Biden, I would say that Palin is more qualified
than he is.

Would you vote for Obama if it was shown that he is sympathetic
towards the PLO, anti-Israeli, was friends with a domestic terrorist,
had communist mentors, etc, etc, etc. Of *course* you would. Pol
Pot himself would be a better choice than a Republican, right?

Dave

On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:11:11 -0800, rw
wrote:

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:32 -0800 (PST), DaveS
wrote:

Yawn. I'll take all of that before I take a born muslim (who
practiced it in Indonesian, who has Communist mentors, terrorists as
friends, pro PLO anti-Israeli buds, crooks as financial buddies, a
minister who hates America and its white population, and a wife who
has never been proud to be an American and who is a racist.

Can you answer what has Obama done? McCain has been serving his
country continuously since before Obama was born. WHAT has Obama done
for me, for you, for America? Nothing! He can read a teleprompter
pretty well....... that's about it.

Dave

I never tire of seeing this. It happens over and over. These political
threads get LaCourse wound up tighter than a virgin's daughter.
Eventually, SPROING!

Maybe so, but I'm not a girly-man, and I don't dress up like a girl.

On Nov 4, 4:33*am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
Eventually, SPROING!

Maybe so, but I'm not a girly-man, and I don't dress up like a girl.- Hide quoted text -

God damn right, Dave does not dress up like a girly man. We agree on
something.

Dave
So have you heard that McCain porked Nancy Raygun in the Lincoln
bedroom. Seriously, he just jumped on it like it was Saigon Judy and
he were LURP One going upcountry.