FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing Tying (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Dubbing material (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=13646)

Fish November 28th, 2004 02:21 AM

Dubbing material
 
I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing
material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which
dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for
wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets.



Thank you,

Fish




Thomas Littleton November 28th, 2004 02:51 AM

Dubbing material
 

"Fish" wrote in message
news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03...
I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing
material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which
dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for
wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets.


Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the
rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard
hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much
synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further
advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were
used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes
for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can
lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new
stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy!
Tom



Thomas Littleton November 28th, 2004 02:51 AM

Dubbing material
 

"Fish" wrote in message
news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03...
I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing
material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which
dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for
wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets.


Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the
rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard
hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much
synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further
advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were
used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes
for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can
lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new
stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy!
Tom




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter