![]() |
Dubbing material
I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing
material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Thank you, Fish |
Dubbing material
"Fish" wrote in message news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03... I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy! Tom |
Dubbing material
"Fish" wrote in message news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03... I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy! Tom |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter