![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing
material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Thank you, Fish |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fish" wrote in message news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03... I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy! Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fish" wrote in message news:mCaqd.178487$G15.99511@fed1read03... I am a neophyte fly tier and recently acquired a small bag full of dubbing material in small un-identified packets. Is there a way to tell which dubbing should be used for dry flies, and which dubbing should be used for wet flies? There are no markings on any of the plastic packets. Now, here is another subject where rules are made to be ignored, but the rule of thumb would be: dubbing with few, or better still no guard hairs(spiky stiff fibers), would be considered dry fly dubbing. Much synthetic dubbing materials are prepared like this and have the further advantage of light fiber weight. Traditionally, absorbant materials were used for smooth wet fly bodies(ex: wool), with the coarser,spikier fur mixes for nymph bodies. Use of modern floatants, underweight on the fly, etc can lead the tyer to throw all of these rules out the window. Play with your new stuff, and find out for yourself!!! Enjoy! Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dubbing Q | THOMAS SCHREIBER | Fly Fishing Tying | 4 | June 5th, 2004 11:10 AM |
To the people here who previously requested the free material | Rodney | Bass Fishing | 6 | February 25th, 2004 12:58 AM |
Seal Dubbing | jim smith | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | February 5th, 2004 06:56 PM |
Dubbing loop question | rb608 | Fly Fishing Tying | 22 | January 24th, 2004 06:54 AM |
Magic Tool for dubbing brush | Wayne | Fly Fishing | 9 | January 13th, 2004 10:53 PM |