FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fishing Photos (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   another test--resizing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=25160)

Opus December 15th, 2006 02:53 AM

another test--resizing
 


Opus December 15th, 2006 02:56 AM

another test--resizing
 
"Opus" wrote in message
.. .

Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my
'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large?

Op



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers December 15th, 2006 03:28 AM

another test--resizing
 
That's actually a good size. Not too large, but the detail is still decent.
--
Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers
http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com
G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods
http://www.herefishyfishy.com

"Opus" wrote in message
.. .



Donut December 15th, 2006 08:54 AM

another test--resizing - No HTML.jpg (0/1)
 
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:03 -0500, "Opus"
wrote:

"Opus" wrote in message
. ..

Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my
'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large?

Op


The file size is good for what the people in this group like to see.
Me? I don't care :) I have a cable connection, but am sensitive to
dial up users and those with marginal NNTP servers.

Now all you need to do is turn off the html, not appropriate for
Usenet. That Teranews deal is pretty darned good. I suggested it once
in roff, but since I choose to not reveal my email address, instead of
any positive replies, I was mocked for being anonymous :) No skin off
my nose, and frankly I sort of expected that sort of reaction from
some in that group... Oh well.

Attached is where you turn off the HTML.

Don



Donut December 15th, 2006 08:54 AM

another test--resizing - No HTML.jpg (1/1)
 
1 Attachment(s)



Charlie Choc December 15th, 2006 01:37 PM

another test--resizing
 
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:03 -0500, "Opus" wrote:

"Opus" wrote in message
. ..

Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my
'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large?

It's just less than 100K bytes. Photoshop can show pictures at different screen
sizes without changing the file size.
--
Charlie...
http://www.chocphoto.com

The Great Gazooka December 15th, 2006 11:49 PM

another test--resizing
 
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:28:39 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
wrote:

That's actually a good size. Not too large, but the detail is still decent.

You tell him spammer. By golly.

bill allemann December 16th, 2006 02:54 PM

another test--resizing
 
the size on your screen and the data size of the file are two different
issues.
photo editing software can save a file at many different quality levels that
affect file size dramatically at a given image size.



"Opus" wrote in message
.. .
"Opus" wrote in message
.. .

Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my
'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large?

Op


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter