FishingBanter

FishingBanter (http://www.fishingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Fly Fishing (http://www.fishingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   SAGE SP and SLT (http://www.fishingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=2780)

TKS October 26th, 2003 03:30 AM

SAGE SP and SLT
 
Hi,

Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.

Thanks



Wayne Knight October 27th, 2003 05:22 AM

SAGE SP and SLT
 

"TKS" wrote in message
...
Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.


As far as I am concerned, they're both a joy to cast and fish and the only
difference to me is the SP is no longer made and the SLT is.




Scott Seidman October 27th, 2003 03:02 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 
(Greg Pavlov) wrote in news:3fa118eb.59525102
@news.cis.dfn.de:

You can still find SPs, and they will be a heck of a lot
cheaper than SLTs when you do.


Jealous!!

Scott

Guyz-N-Flyz October 27th, 2003 10:18 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 

"Greg Pavlov" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:30:52 +0700, "TKS" wrote:

Hi,

Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.


You can still find SPs, and they will be a heck of a lot
cheaper than SLTs when you do. Otherwise, the SLT
seems just a bit "faster" than the SPs, but others may
disagree.


I disagree!

Op



R.D.L. October 28th, 2003 12:31 AM

SAGE SP and SLT
 
I cancel your vote, and agree with Greg. Back to even.

Richard


"Guyz-N-Flyz" wrote in message
. ..

"Greg Pavlov" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:30:52 +0700, "TKS" wrote:

Hi,

Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.


You can still find SPs, and they will be a heck of a lot
cheaper than SLTs when you do. Otherwise, the SLT
seems just a bit "faster" than the SPs, but others may
disagree.


I disagree!

Op





Bill Kiene October 28th, 2003 05:51 AM

SAGE SP and SLT
 
TKS,

The older, now discontinued, SP is a little softer/slower than the new SLT.

The SP would be good for short to medium distances and great with extremely
light (6x-7x) tippet.

The SLT would be better in the wind and for distance. It would make a better
all around trout rod because of the better casting performance.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"TKS" wrote in message
...
Hi,

Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.

Thanks





CB October 28th, 2003 03:58 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 
What about the SP+? Is that faster or slower than the SP?

Chris Brown

"TKS" wrote in message
...
Hi,

Anyone who had casted these two rods give advise/review,
on what is the difference.
Lets say both are 4 weights.

Thanks





Jarmo Hurri October 28th, 2003 04:16 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 

A related question: has anyone had the chance to try the 7 or 8wt SLT?

--
Jarmo Hurri

Spam countermeasures included. Drop your brain when replying, or just
use .

Guyz-N-Flyz October 28th, 2003 11:15 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 

"Greg Pavlov" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 17:18:34 -0500, "Guyz-N-Flyz"
wrote:


I disagree!

Op


That's fine, Op, everyone has a right - at least until
recently, anyway - to their own opinions: it's one of
the great strengths of this land of ours. Then again,
why anyone would want to be dead wrong *and*
advertise it is beyond me...


Why I do anything is beyond me and all who know me, yet I still disagree.

Op --just plain disagreeable--



Wolfgang October 28th, 2003 11:25 PM

SAGE SP and SLT
 

"Guyz-N-Flyz" wrote in message
. ..


Why I do anything is beyond me and all who know me, yet I still disagree.


No, you don't.

Wolfgang




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2006 FishingBanter