"Wayne Knight" wrote in message
. ..

"Alaskan420" wrote in message
news:8gHng.9164$U%1.5780@trndny07...

is that just another
symptom of the liberal dogma?

I am very willing to debate the war with anyone but please don't just
spew
what you've read in the papers, liberal or conservative. Do the research
for
yourself and come to the table prepared.


I told you once. you are seriously undergunned in the logic department. I
do not think you want to go there.

And before anyone goes off half-cocked.

They have medicines so you can get full-cocked. I work in health care
trust
me.

The global problem of Islamic terrorism has very little to do with who's
president or even America itself. And Iraq was an internal "killing
field"
long before the U.S. got involved.

Iraq wasn't about global terrorism but since you must, what about the
other
killing fields that we so conviently don't consider our issue? Oh, they
don't sit on a large crude oil deposit.

Ummm...

Who said Iraq was about Global terrorism? Notice the "period" after the word
itself? You have to read rw's previous post. That sentence was a response to
his claim that we turned Iraq into a killing field. Which we did not. We
just added American casualties.

Do you folks truly believe Iraq was about oil? If so, can you tell me where
it's going since we've been there? Why didn't we attack Saudi Arabia? Far
more oil and certainly more valid political reasons to attack there.

P.S. Wayne, personnal attacks don't validate your political view. Show me
facts. I am a logical person. My opinions can change.


--
Ric Hamel
A misplaced Alaskan lost in ConUS