Tom Littleton wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

As I have already documented, starting with the state parks.

http://www.animalrights.net/archives...02/000019.html
http://www.mosportsmen.com/fishing/fishnews2.htm
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_.../headline/1129

Your pal,

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel.


how does "Peta has requested....." translate into anything, Tim?? I mean, I
would like Pennsylvania to give me a 2% cut from the upcoming slot machine
parlors, and could put that request to the Governor, but I doubt anything
will come of it. Twenty loons sending a petition is similar in impact. As
was stated, show us any sign of progress since you first posted this
hypothesis......
Tom

With all due respect, the question RalphH asked was what strategy was
PETA going to follow. I provided a very clear answer with the links
that showed the strategy in the form of incrementalism, starting with
State Parks. The links are clear regarding this intent, if not
immediate success with the tactic, a claim I did not make. Fact is,
fishing is banned more and more in wetlands and wildlife and waterfowl
sanctuaries etc. It is closed at Hanging Lake in colorado as
'incompatible with the harmony' and, it would not suprise me to see it
banned in city and state parks as the first cut.

Your pal,

Tim