On Nov 5, 11:15*am, DaveS wrote:
On Nov 4, 9:39*am, wrote:





On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:48:12 -0500, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
Obama is truly pathological. When I suggested it
I was not employing a rhetorical device, I mean
it *- not rational.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Man, I don't think he's pathological...oh, he may not always be rational, but I
think it is excessive for you to call him "pathological."

HTH,
R
...oh, sure, you may THINK you are saying one thing, but WE know what you REALLY
mean...

Richard, outing you on this stuff just gets easier and easier. Here is
a cite. EVEN RUPPERT MURDOCK's WSJ gagged at your lie, well lets just
say the lie you passed on. WJS says your take is bullcrap. Do you even
care?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/1...s-obamas-asia-...

Why do you think that it is necessary to pay your Rightard dues by
posting the crap from the Rightard Morning Talking Points E-mail on
ROFF? Can't you find some other more fertile field to grow these ****
cabbages? Or at least disguise it better? There are enough real issues
and differences if one really must post polit stuff.

Dave- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hopefully this is a better addy for the Wall Street Journal put down
of the bogus Rightard lies about the cost of the Obama Indian trip. In
any case you can check out their fact finding in the WSJ of 11/4/10.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/1...mas-asia-trip/

Dave