Um, Ken..., or, suddenly, $24,000.00 for a evening out in NYC seems like a bargain...

On Nov 3, 12:17*pm, wrote:
It is being reported by multiple sources, including on-site and local press in
India, that the Obama family's little trip (in which he isn't going anywhere...)
is costing - are you ready - $200 _million_ USD _a day_ in expenses in India
alone. *

It's a source of wonderment that some people (not all) believe
everything they read on the Internet.

what is this ass wipe hiding & why ?





On Nov 4, 6:26*pm, Giles wrote:
On Nov 4, 8:37*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:

have a un safe trip o'bummer

Moron.

g.

On Nov 5, 8:31*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
what is this ass wipe hiding & why ?


Moron.

g.

On Nov 5, 8:31*am, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:

what is this ass wipe hiding & why ?

Why are you always so interested in Obama's ass anyway? Win any
"metals" lately?
Dave

On Nov 4, 9:39*am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:48:12 -0500, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
Obama is truly pathological. When I suggested it
I was not employing a rhetorical device, I mean
it *- not rational.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Man, I don't think he's pathological...oh, he may not always be rational, but I
think it is excessive for you to call him "pathological."

HTH,
R
...oh, sure, you may THINK you are saying one thing, but WE know what you REALLY
mean...

Richard, outing you on this stuff just gets easier and easier. Here is
a cite. EVEN RUPPERT MURDOCK's WSJ gagged at your lie, well lets just
say the lie you passed on. WJS says your take is bullcrap. Do you even
care?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/1...s-obamas-asia-...

Why do you think that it is necessary to pay your Rightard dues by
posting the crap from the Rightard Morning Talking Points E-mail on
ROFF? Can't you find some other more fertile field to grow these ****
cabbages? Or at least disguise it better? There are enough real issues
and differences if one really must post polit stuff.

Dave

DaveS wrote:
... There are enough real issues
and differences if one really must post polit stuff.

Hear, hear.

If you want to talk about really costly scandals you can
talk about the EP-3E Aries II aircraft which collided with
a Chinese jet over the South China Sea in April 2001. The
pilot along with 23 other officers and enlisted men on board
managed to make an emergency landing on Chinese soil. The
Chinese returned the 24 sailors but kept the aircraft.

The sailors, hereafter referred to as the bozos, were attached
to the National Security Agency, also bozos but let's not make
this complicated. The bozos were supposed to disable and destroy
all the equipment and software on the aircraft especially the
N.S.A. operating system on the computers. The bozos erased the
hard drive but they didn't destroy it.

The Chinese reverse-engineered the N.S.A. operating system and
had a detailed road map for decrypting the Navy's intelligence
and operational data which they proceeded to do until Obama's
team came on board. Obama ordered the complete replacement of
the EP-3E operating system at a cost of many, many trips to
India. The Navy has "no comment" and the actual cost is classified.

This is all prelude to the battle over who will be in charge
of cyber security, the N.S.A. and the military or civilians.
Really, there's a battle. The same bozos who couldn't find their
own asses with both hands and a flashlight want to be in charge
national cyber security. I wish I were joking.

Thank god for Obama, if not for him the Chinese would still be
reading about everything the Navy was up to and the military-
cyber complex would be even more a menace than it is currently.
Who do you want in charge of cyber security, the whiz kids with
the nose rings and tattoos or the bozos who join the military
because they're not bright enough to get a real job ? And who
do you think the Republicans would put in charge ?

This is the real ****, not some travel budget crap whipped up
by the whackjobs.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Nov 5, 11:15*am, DaveS wrote:
On Nov 4, 9:39*am, wrote:





On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:48:12 -0500, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
Obama is truly pathological. When I suggested it
I was not employing a rhetorical device, I mean
it *- not rational.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Man, I don't think he's pathological...oh, he may not always be rational, but I
think it is excessive for you to call him "pathological."

HTH,
R
...oh, sure, you may THINK you are saying one thing, but WE know what you REALLY
mean...

Richard, outing you on this stuff just gets easier and easier. Here is
a cite. EVEN RUPPERT MURDOCK's WSJ gagged at your lie, well lets just
say the lie you passed on. WJS says your take is bullcrap. Do you even
care?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/1...s-obamas-asia-...

Why do you think that it is necessary to pay your Rightard dues by
posting the crap from the Rightard Morning Talking Points E-mail on
ROFF? Can't you find some other more fertile field to grow these ****
cabbages? Or at least disguise it better? There are enough real issues
and differences if one really must post polit stuff.

Dave- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hopefully this is a better addy for the Wall Street Journal put down
of the bogus Rightard lies about the cost of the Obama Indian trip. In
any case you can check out their fact finding in the WSJ of 11/4/10.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/1...mas-asia-trip/

Dave

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
DaveS wrote:
... There are enough real issues
and differences if one really must post polit stuff.

Hear, hear.

If you want to talk about really costly scandals you can
talk about the EP-3E Aries II aircraft which collided with
a Chinese jet over the South China Sea in April 2001. ...

Oops, meant to post this URL too:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...1fa_fact_hersh

--
Ken Fortenberry

i wonder if he ( ass wipe - o'bummer ) is going to India to allow
them to take out Pakistan?

Probably not, more like he needs tech support for his Dell.....

On Nov 5, 1:23*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
i wonder if he ( ass wipe - o'bummer ) is going to India to allow
them to take out Pakistan?

Probably not, more like he needs tech support for his Dell.....

Another Palin voter Shares His Views: Maybe you can get a "metal"
mouthing martial sounds like "take out Pakistan?" Hey Beanster, you
are up, give me your pack and take the point, Now.
Jezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzze

Dave