"Well, see, I was bored and had all of the paintings..."

Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...ack-Obama.html

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

wrote:
Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...ack-Obama.html

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

But are the the painting's indicative of the economic and terrorist
threats the US faces, and if so, are they
Obama's fault, Bush's fault, or Clinton's fault?

Tim Lysyk

On Mar 20, 5:17*am, wrote:
Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...utthat/4961632...

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

Considering your preference for English racist prat boy sites, I think
you might find this pix enjoyable. It is not political but what the
hell.

http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/fea...l.asp?picnum=7

Ill try to find that graphic of Cheney getting ****ed by that large
devil goat in the basement of the Whitehouse that Gluckert liked so
much, or the news photos of the RNC leadership marching in the upstate
NY American Nazi parade in 1940. These might make you laugh too. All
good fun right?

Dave

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:42:29 GMT, Tim Lysyk wrote:

wrote:
Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...ack-Obama.html

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

But are the the painting's indicative of the economic and terrorist
threats the US faces, and if so, are they
Obama's fault, Bush's fault, or Clinton's fault?

Mainly, I think they are indicative that just because one has access to art
materials doesn't mean that one should take advantage of that access...and the
fault is purely that of the respective, er, "artists"

I know it when I don't see it,
R

Tim Lysyk

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:24:48 -0700 (PDT), DaveS wrote:

On Mar 20, 5:17*am, wrote:
Presented (with comments):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...utthat/4961632...

There's no doubt that the website mentioned is 100% accurately
named...(work-safe)

I don't see how it could help, but it might make ya laugh,
R

Considering your preference for English racist prat boy sites,

Er, it was linked by either Politico or WashPost...

I think
you might find this pix enjoyable. It is not political but what the
hell.

http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/fea...l.asp?picnum=7

Ill try to find that graphic of Cheney getting ****ed by that large
devil goat in the basement of the Whitehouse that Gluckert liked so
much, or the news photos of the RNC leadership marching in the upstate
NY American Nazi parade in 1940. These might make you laugh too. All
good fun right?

You really need to keep up with your meds, Sarge...

HTH,
R

Dave