What better symbol of the bull****....

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...s-sex-scandal/

No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in
trouble, it was front and center for days. But to be fair, maybe it
just wasn't as much real news as Simon Cowell's income per minute, Lisa
Marie naming her twins, and "Gossip Girls" doing an anti-McCain ad...

Sheesh,
R

wrote:
http://elections.foxnews...

Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you.

No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in
trouble, it was front and center for days. ...

More comedy from the right field bleachers.

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

LOL !!

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
http://elections.foxnews...

Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you.

ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was
the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page,"
but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa
Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley.

No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in
trouble, it was front and center for days. ...

More comedy from the right field bleachers.

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity
surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of
funds, misuse of funds, etc. And then, there's the lefties' old fav,
"bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!"
Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as
yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a
pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses
with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the
"candidate of morality" is OK. And there is some question as to her
being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an
affair with an existing aide.

And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement
acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly
engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in
any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were
pages or underage.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

LOL !!

Sad.

HTH,
R

On Oct 14, 7:02*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
wrote:
http://elections.foxnews...

Fox news ?? Poor thing, you've got it bad don't you.

ABC News broke the story, I just found it interesting that CNN is/was
the only major "news" outlet in the US that didn't have it "front page,"
but rather had **** about Simon Cowell per-minute income and Lisa
Marie's twins' names, esp. after their coverage of Foley.

No "first page" mention of it on cnn's website, yet when Foley was in
trouble, it was front and center for days. ...

More comedy from the right field bleachers.

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Much like Clinton, it's not the "boinking," it's the activity
surrounding it - in this case, bribery, obstruction of justice, theft of
funds, misuse of funds, etc. *And then, there's the lefties' old fav,
"bu-bu-but he campaigned _specifically_ on a "morality" platform!!!!"
Naturally, an international defender of homosexual rights such as
yourself wouldn't suggest that a homosexual (unmarried) is somehow a
pervert whereas a straight guy cheating on his wife, bribing mistresses
with campaign and taxpayer funds, all while campaigning as the
"candidate of morality" is OK. * And there is some question as to her
being his mistress when she became an aide rather than his beginning an
affair with an existing aide. *

And FWIW, apparently even his objective critics and law enforcement
acknowledge that while Foley did exchange improper emails and possibly
engage in highly improper conversations with pages, he did not engage in
any sexual activity with _anyone_, page or otherwise, while they were
pages or underage.



Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

LOL !!

Sad.

HTH,
R

What better demonstration of bull**** than you two bull****ters trying
to bull**** each other.

The two of you are primarily responsible for turning this group into
nothing more than a complete shower of bull****.

Quite poetic justice really to see you trying to bull**** each other.

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
More comedy from the right field bleachers.

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Much like Clinton, ...
snip more wingnut comedy
Sad.

Yes, it is sad. You're really taking this election season hard
aren't you poor thing. Why don't you just take a nice little
vacation for the next three weeks, ignore politics completely
and then come back when it's all over. Trust me, you're not
gonna want to watch this one.

But then you knew that already, that's why you're posting wingnut
comedy in the first place.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at
least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that.
Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say
nothing of it. And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes".
Your slip is showing, Ken.

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

But you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at
least one male page. RAPED HIM! And you say nothing of that. ...

It's all Clinton's fault !!

LOL !!

I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut
from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the
election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer
for awhile and move on.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Oct 14, 8:30*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
Let's see, Foley was soliciting sex from teenage boys and the
GOP covered his ass for years versus the Dem who was boinking
one of his adult female aides being called on the carpet almost
immediately by the Dem leadership.

Oh but first I have to ask, is "first page" the title of a
comedy album ? How about "better symbol of the bull****" ?

But *you conveniently forget about the Dem Congress(man?) who raped at
least one *male page. *RAPED HIM! * And you say nothing of that.
Soliciting versus the actual act of forceable RAPE, and you say
nothing of it. *And, let's through in Barney's little "mistakes".
Your slip is showing, Ken.

Dave

And bull****ter number three chimes in on cue. Also
boring......................

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:37:37 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

It's all Clinton's fault !!

LOL !!

I'll give you the same advice I gave the other vocal wingnut
from the far right on this group, take a break, ignore the
election and then come back on November 5, cry in your beer
for awhile and move on.

Who the hell said anything about Clinton?

Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. And *nothing* was done
about it. Soliciting sex with pages? Yeah, well good luck. If you
get caught you will be embarassed. Rape a page? Yeah, well good
luck. If you get caught, and you're a Democrat, nothing will happen
to you.

I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you
won't be able to function if McCain wins. Good luck, Ken. It is
gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins. d;o)

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
It's all Clinton's fault !!

LOL !!

Who the hell said anything about Clinton?

Studds, a Democrat FORCIBLY RAPED a male page. ...

Everything wrong is Clinton's fault. The GOP sent out a memo,
apparently you didn't get the memo. And Gerry Studds never did
any such thing. Once again you're lying Louie.

But of course we all know that the Dems are vicious child rapers
and Republicans are all paragons of virtue who are the victims
of a vast liberal conspiracy consisting of the mainstream media
and a bunch of America hating ex-hippies and egghead professors
who never served their country. I know this because I heard it
in a country western song playing on the loudspeakers before the
start of a NASCAR race. LOL !!

I have said I can live with an Obama presidency, but I *know* you
won't be able to function if McCain wins.

Well, apparently your spouse won't be able to function if Obama
wins. What's the deal with that ? Nobody I know bases their
decision on when to retire on the political party of the current
President.

Good luck, Ken. It is
gonna be a miserable 8 years if McCain wins.

Well, that's surely true enough, but I wouldn't worry about it
if I were you.

--
Ken Fortenberry