PMWS pork entering food chain

"(o)(o)" wrote in message ...
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:44:32 -0000, "pearl"
wrote:

"Jim Webster" wrote in message ...
..
Fair enough, pearl refuses to admit the details of her diet because she
knows we'd take the rip out of her because of the air miles and the fact
that most is imported from third world countries with water deficits.

You've some cheek, blame shifter.

You can't twist and wiggle your way off the hook, try as you might,
and the more you try, the more foolish and ignorant you look, jim.

That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and sustainability.

He's only continuing out of concern for status and the NG he inhabits.

He obviously doesn't play chess, you checkmate him in so few
moves..lol

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"(o)(o)" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:44:32 -0000, "pearl"
wrote:

"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...
..
Fair enough, pearl refuses to admit the details of her diet because
she
knows we'd take the rip out of her because of the air miles and the
fact
that most is imported from third world countries with water deficits.

You've some cheek, blame shifter.

You can't twist and wiggle your way off the hook, try as you might,
and the more you try, the more foolish and ignorant you look, jim.

That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading
this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and sustainability.

He's only continuing out of concern for status and the NG he inhabits.

He obviously doesn't play chess, you checkmate him in so few
moves..lol







Please reply just to the newsgroup you have read this rubbish in, do not
pollute other newsgroups.

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"(o)(o)" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:44:32 -0000, "pearl"
wrote:

"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...
..
Fair enough, pearl refuses to admit the details of her diet because
she
knows we'd take the rip out of her because of the air miles and the
fact
that most is imported from third world countries with water deficits.

You've some cheek, blame shifter.

You can't twist and wiggle your way off the hook, try as you might,
and the more you try, the more foolish and ignorant you look, jim.

That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading
this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and sustainability.

no, I'm posting for those intelligent enough to work out that the ones who
matter are the Brazilians, Chinese and Indians,
pete and pearl and irrelevent

Jim Webster

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"pearl" wrote in message
...

THERE _IS_ ENOUGH FOOD TO GO ROUND - TO FEED
PEOPLE DIRECTLY; THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TO FEED
LIVESTOCK TOO. IT IS EITHER PEOPLE, WILDLIFE,
AND THE ENVIRONMENT, OR, PEOPLE EATING MEAT.

That is, as we've seen, *SOME* PEOPLE EATING MEAT.
The rest (~50%) can die of starvation and poverty-related
diseases as far a jim and co are concerned. And as global
warming and the unsustainable abuse of natural resources
continues, fewer and fewer people will have enough to eat..

It's time to make some wise choices and do the right thing.

don't tell me, tell the Chinese and the South Americans and the others
who
grow the soya you vegetarians depend on

I'm telling you and others who require more than your fair share
in the form of grain, land, water, energy for feed for livestock.

never mind pearl, I don't really care what you eat or do for a living, if it
embarasses you that much

Jim Webster

"Jim Webster" wrote in message ...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"pearl" wrote in message
...

THERE _IS_ ENOUGH FOOD TO GO ROUND - TO FEED
PEOPLE DIRECTLY; THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TO FEED
LIVESTOCK TOO. IT IS EITHER PEOPLE, WILDLIFE,
AND THE ENVIRONMENT, OR, PEOPLE EATING MEAT.

That is, as we've seen, *SOME* PEOPLE EATING MEAT.
The rest (~50%) can die of starvation and poverty-related
diseases as far a jim and co are concerned. And as global
warming and the unsustainable abuse of natural resources
continues, fewer and fewer people will have enough to eat..

It's time to make some wise choices and do the right thing.

don't tell me, tell the Chinese and the South Americans and the others
who
grow the soya you vegetarians depend on

I'm telling you and others who require more than your fair share
in the form of grain, land, water, energy for feed for livestock.

never mind pearl, I don't really care what you eat or do for a living, if it
embarasses you that much

Not at all. And all you needed to say was "I really don't care".

"Jim Webster" wrote in message ...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"(o)(o)" wrote in message
...
..
That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and sustainability.

no, I'm posting for those intelligent enough to work out that the ones who
matter are the Brazilians, Chinese and Indians,

That doesn't require any working out.

pete and pearl and irrelevent

I do hope that you're enjoying the weather.

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"pearl" wrote in message
...

THERE _IS_ ENOUGH FOOD TO GO ROUND - TO FEED
PEOPLE DIRECTLY; THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TO FEED
LIVESTOCK TOO. IT IS EITHER PEOPLE, WILDLIFE,
AND THE ENVIRONMENT, OR, PEOPLE EATING MEAT.

That is, as we've seen, *SOME* PEOPLE EATING MEAT.
The rest (~50%) can die of starvation and poverty-related
diseases as far a jim and co are concerned. And as global
warming and the unsustainable abuse of natural resources
continues, fewer and fewer people will have enough to eat..

It's time to make some wise choices and do the right thing.

don't tell me, tell the Chinese and the South Americans and the others
who
grow the soya you vegetarians depend on

I'm telling you and others who require more than your fair share
in the form of grain, land, water, energy for feed for livestock.

never mind pearl, I don't really care what you eat or do for a living, if
it
embarasses you that much

Not at all. And all you needed to say was "I really don't care".



afraid to post under her real name
ashamed of her job
embarassed by her diet

poor pearl

Jim Webster

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"(o)(o)" wrote in message
...
..
That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading
this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and
sustainability.

no, I'm posting for those intelligent enough to work out that the ones
who
matter are the Brazilians, Chinese and Indians,

That doesn't require any working out.

you are having trouble grasping it

pete and pearl and irrelevent

I do hope that you're enjoying the weather.

of course, as our house was built four or more centuries before planning
acts it is in a sensible place.
As opposed to where local government would want us to build

Jim Webster

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:29:03 -0000, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"pearl" wrote in message
...

THERE _IS_ ENOUGH FOOD TO GO ROUND - TO FEED
PEOPLE DIRECTLY; THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TO FEED
LIVESTOCK TOO. IT IS EITHER PEOPLE, WILDLIFE,
AND THE ENVIRONMENT, OR, PEOPLE EATING MEAT.

That is, as we've seen, *SOME* PEOPLE EATING MEAT.
The rest (~50%) can die of starvation and poverty-related
diseases as far a jim and co are concerned. And as global
warming and the unsustainable abuse of natural resources
continues, fewer and fewer people will have enough to eat..

It's time to make some wise choices and do the right thing.

don't tell me, tell the Chinese and the South Americans and the others
who
grow the soya you vegetarians depend on

I'm telling you and others who require more than your fair share
in the form of grain, land, water, energy for feed for livestock.

never mind pearl, I don't really care what you eat or do for a living, if
it
embarasses you that much

Not at all. And all you needed to say was "I really don't care".



afraid to post under her real name

Protection from extremist bullies like you is a good idea.

ashamed of her job

At least she has one. Unlike you and your family of state benefit
ponces, brought up on handouts at the taxpayers expense!

embarassed by her diet

You're the one happy to abuse your diet, yourself and your family.
Look what it's done for you!

poor pearl

Jim Webster

Poor Jim Webster, forced to backtrack so many times, after discovering
bullies don't always win. Where shall we start next?

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:33:56 -0000, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"pearl" wrote in message
...
"Jim Webster" wrote in message
...

"pearl" wrote in message
...
"(o)(o)" wrote in message
...
..
That's our dimbo. He cares little for himself or his own family, let
alone the global community.

That is clear, and he doesn't seem to realise that most people reading
this
do care about other human beings, if not biodiversity and
sustainability.

no, I'm posting for those intelligent enough to work out that the ones
who
matter are the Brazilians, Chinese and Indians,

That doesn't require any working out.

you are having trouble grasping it

pete and pearl and irrelevent

I do hope that you're enjoying the weather.

of course, as our house was built four or more centuries before planning
acts it is in a sensible place.
As opposed to where local government would want us to build


Planning applications not quite going your way! lol.