|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
December 15th, 2006, 02:53 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
another test--resizing
|
|
#2
December 15th, 2006, 02:56 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing
"Opus" wrote in message
.. . Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my 'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large? Op -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
#3
December 15th, 2006, 03:28 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing
That's actually a good size. Not too large, but the detail is still decent.
-- Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com G & S Guide Service and Custom Rods http://www.herefishyfishy.com "Opus" wrote in message .. .
|
|
#4
December 15th, 2006, 08:54 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing - No HTML.jpg (0/1)
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:03 -0500, "Opus"
wrote: "Opus" wrote in message . .. Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my 'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large? Op The file size is good for what the people in this group like to see. Me? I don't care  I have a cable connection, but am sensitive todial up users and those with marginal NNTP servers. Now all you need to do is turn off the html, not appropriate for Usenet. That Teranews deal is pretty darned good. I suggested it once in roff, but since I choose to not reveal my email address, instead of any positive replies, I was mocked for being anonymous No skin offmy nose, and frankly I sort of expected that sort of reaction from some in that group... Oh well. Attached is where you turn off the HTML. Don
|
|
#5
December 15th, 2006, 08:54 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing - No HTML.jpg (1/1)
|
|
#6
December 15th, 2006, 01:37 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:56:03 -0500, "Opus" wrote:
"Opus" wrote in message . .. Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my 'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large? It's just less than 100K bytes. Photoshop can show pictures at different screen sizes without changing the file size. -- Charlie... http://www.chocphoto.com
|
|
#7
December 15th, 2006, 11:49 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:28:39 -0600, "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers"
wrote: That's actually a good size. Not too large, but the detail is still decent. You tell him spammer. By golly.
|
|
#8
December 16th, 2006, 02:54 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.fishing
|
|||
|
|||
|
another test--resizing
the size on your screen and the data size of the file are two different
issues. photo editing software can save a file at many different quality levels that affect file size dramatically at a given image size. "Opus" wrote in message .. . "Opus" wrote in message .. . Charlie, did this one show up smaller? Seriously. It shows 137kb on my 'puter, but the pic opens in Adobe Photoshop and is quite large? Op -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| test | netvigator | Fly Fishing | 1 | December 3rd, 2006 07:50 AM |
| test | Bass Fishing | 0 | February 23rd, 2006 11:53 PM | |
| test | EJ | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | January 1st, 2006 11:32 AM |
| test | EJ | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | January 1st, 2006 12:34 AM |
Linear Mode
