![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:51:43 -0800, "Tom Nakashima" wrote: Anyone still use split shots and no beaded nymphs? That is my normal nymphing rig. I usually know what will work on my home waters, so I use just one nymph on the end of an 18 inch tippet. I put non-toxic split shot at the tippet/leader knot (generally a double surgeon's knot. I will "tune" the rig by adding or subtracting weight until I get the right drift. I generally do not use a strike indicator, but if I do I tune it for the right depth. Although I have them, I don't like using beaded nymphs if they are the metal type. I have glass beads on many of my home-ties and they do not add that much weight to the fly. Dave Same here Dave, I like the idea of adding and subtracting weight depending on the current and drift. I remember someone asking about choice of flies. And I added; First think: 1. Size 2. Then Pattern 3. Then Color With Nymphs it's slightly different; First think; 1. Size 2. Action 3. Texture 4. Pattern 5. Color By action, I like to try to get the drift right by using a non beaded nymph and adding splits and a single fly. I usually start out with the Fuzzy Hare's Ear. Just love the way it tumbles through the feeding zones. I also don't use an indicator, just hate them, and this is where texture comes into play. Fish will eject as fast as they detect. I also like active nymphing, pulling fish out of the feeding zones. Soft Hackle Woolly Worm, or Streamers. Again action, they'll sometimes chase and strike just out of curiosity. -tom |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried experimenting with something last year. I work Frog's Fanny
(i.e., hydrophobic Cabosil) into the dubbing of my dropper nymph (preferably done when I tie them, but it also works after the fact). This makes the fly buoyant and causes it (I believe) to float above the weight or above the weighted top nymph. The fish seem to like it, and it results in fewer snags. Some say that the Frog's Fanny makes bubbles that imitate a natural. BTW, I prefer using weight instead of bead-head nymphs. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Nov, 15:44, rw wrote:
I tried experimenting with something last year. I work Frog's Fanny (i.e., hydrophobic Cabosil) into the dubbing of my dropper nymph (preferably done when I tie them, but it also works after the fact). This makes the fly buoyant and causes it (I believe) to float above the weight or above the weighted top nymph. The fish seem to like it, and it results in fewer snags. Some say that the Frog's Fanny makes bubbles that imitate a natural. BTW, I prefer using weight instead of bead-head nymphs. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. I have not used either Frog´s Fanny, or the fumed silica, but I agree with waterproofing a lot of nymphs. I generally use watershed on the dubbing. It can and often does make a very big difference. Of course, one must then weight the nymphs, or use them on weighted rigs of some description. One nymph that works very well indeed for a host of situations is a pheasant tail/ hare´s ear nymph. The abdomen is pheasant tail, and the thorax hare´s ear. I put a drop of watershed on the thorax immediately after dressing the flies. These flies are a lot more buoyant, and they catch more fish as well. The silvery appearance caused by small bubbles obviously enhances the fly´s attraction to the fish considerably, ( I know there is a lot of discussion and controversy about this). After some experimentation, I also now have a range of soft hackles where I waterproof the thorax ( where present) AND the soft hackle with watershed. When fished as emergers in the film, these catch A LOT! more fish, and they also work better when used on various weighted rigs. A couple of hair hackles I use are also a lot more effective after this treatment. This is one which has been very very successful indeed; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on..._squirrel.html TL MC |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:44:30 -0700, rw
wrote: I tried experimenting with something last year. I work Frog's Fanny (i.e., hydrophobic Cabosil) into the dubbing of my dropper nymph (preferably done when I tie them, but it also works after the fact). This makes the fly buoyant and causes it (I believe) to float above the weight or above the weighted top nymph. The fish seem to like it, and it results in fewer snags. Some say that the Frog's Fanny makes bubbles that imitate a natural. BTW, I prefer using weight instead of bead-head nymphs. I've used Frog's Fanny in the same way and it works very well with LaFontain's caddis pupa. I am sure that your assessment about the nymph floating higher is correct. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NWC question | pat gustafson | Bass Fishing | 2 | August 15th, 2005 04:30 PM |
droppers for Penn's | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 9 | May 26th, 2005 11:32 AM |
Question | Art Salmons | Bass Fishing | 1 | October 2nd, 2004 04:14 PM |
Dries for droppers | Jarmo Hurri | Fly Fishing | 35 | July 27th, 2004 02:36 PM |
Penn's creek zit droppers | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 4 | May 2nd, 2004 07:17 PM |