![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The past few years I've been fishing 2 nymphs, tying a dropper off the hook of the top nymph. I've found that about 95% of the time I only catch fish on the bottom nymph. I've even switched them around on some days just to experiment. I was wondering if others have the same experience and might know why this is? -- flyman23 :fish: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ flyman23's Profile: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...hp?userid=1043 View this thread: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...ad.php?t=12916 ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
flyman23 wrote in
: The past few years I've been fishing 2 nymphs, tying a dropper off the hook of the top nymph. I've found that about 95% of the time I only catch fish on the bottom nymph. I've even switched them around on some days just to experiment. I was wondering if others have the same experience and might know why this is? Some might say the top nymph will get the attention, and the bottom nymph will get the bite. For me, though, its much closer to 50-50. Great technique. Doubles your chance of getting a good dead drift in the right place. I like tying a beadhead on as the top nymph, and a beadless version of the same imitation as the trailer. If the water seems real fast, a tungsten bead might be the way to go. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In my experience, tying on the hookbend -seems -to interfere with hooking fish. I switched to tying the "top" fly off the tag end of the knot i add my terminal section of tippet to and have seen improvements. it also seems to cast better for me with fewer tangles. -- eddavidson9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eddavidson9's Profile: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...hp?userid=2205 View this thread: http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...ad.php?t=12916 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 6, 6:43 am, eddavidson9
wrote: In my experience, tying on the hookbend -seems -to interfere with hooking fish. I switched to tying the "top" fly off the tag end of the knot i add my terminal section of tippet to and have seen improvements. it also seems to cast better for me with fewer tangles. -- eddavidson9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eddavidson9's Profile:http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...hp?userid=2205 View this thread:http://www.njflyfishing.com/vBulleti...ad.php?t=12916 I agree. At one point a guide showed me a method he used that I have adopted. He would take a short (3-5") section of fairly stout and stiff material, say 6-8 Lb test, tie a perfection loop in it, and loop it onto the main leader above the tippet knot. With knotted leaders you can place several of these up the leader with different selections for the fish to inspect. I like this rather than tying to the bend in the hook method because it allows me to change the upper fly without retying the lower and it allows me to change the separation between the two flies without much hassle. When the upper dropper gets to short you can tie another one on without rebuilding the leader. JM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
flyman23 wrote:
The past few years I've been fishing 2 nymphs, tying a dropper off the hook of the top nymph. I've found that about 95% of the time I only catch fish on the bottom nymph. I've even switched them around on some days just to experiment. I was wondering if others have the same experience and might know why this is? It is mainly because the action of the first nymph is "strangled" by the way it is attached. Also this method of attachment interferes with hook-ups, and will also prevent you from detecting takes. It is likely that you get just as many takes to the dropper nymph, but the fish nudges it away, and you dont see them. This also depends on the patterns you use. patterns with a little more hackle or rough dubbing tend to work better even when somewhat strangled, than weighted streamlined nymphs. Also, you might like to try using a leader ring to attach your dropper fly and point nymph; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...s/leaders.html TL MC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Nov 2007 13:15:53 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: If the water seems real fast, a tungsten bead might be the way to go Or very deep. When it is deep of fast, I tend to use a weighted stonefly nymph as the top one (to get the rig down) and the *entended* fly as the bottom one. Years ago when I got into nymphing I always fished with multiple flies (I stopped at 3). The biggest problem I had with them was tangles, especially after catching a fish. There is also the danger of catching two or three (!) fish at a time. I know it sounds good, but you really don't want that to happen. I've had two on at the same time and it broke the tippet. And, the only time I have hooked myself deeply was on a multi-fly set up while removing the hook from the fish. One slip, the fish was back in the water, and the other hook was deep in my finger - no barb, thankyouverymuch! I now fish with only one nymph and use non-toxic shot to get it down. Remember, you want the drift to be slower than the surface water (bubbles, foam, stuff on the surface is how you would measure the surface speed). Having more than 1 fly can often upset your "tuning" of the rig, i.e., getting the drift at the right depth and speed. But, hey. Experiment. It is always a good practice to do so. Best to learn the circle cast also as used by Lefty. No false casts. Simply pick up the rig after it has gone past you down-stream and in one giant lob, cast it back up-stream. Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:43:15 -0500, eddavidson9
wrote: In my experience, tying on the hookbend -seems -to interfere with hooking fish. I switched to tying the "top" fly off the tag end of the knot i add my terminal section of tippet to and have seen improvements. it also seems to cast better for me with fewer tangles. I agree. There are several methods beside using the bend of the hook, but I like the tag end of the tippet/leader knot. Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote in
: I agree. There are several methods beside using the bend of the hook, but I like the tag end of the tippet/leader knot. That's what I'll usually do, if I can remember to do it. If not, I'll just tie on to the bend and take my lumps. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Nov, 23:44, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:43:15 -0500, eddavidson9 wrote: In my experience, tying on the hookbend -seems -to interfere with hooking fish. I switched to tying the "top" fly off the tag end of the knot i add my terminal section of tippet to and have seen improvements. it also seems to cast better for me with fewer tangles. I agree. There are several methods beside using the bend of the hook, but I like the tag end of the tippet/leader knot. Dave If you only fish with one nymph, why would you need the tag end of a knot for attaching another one? Apart from which, using the tag end of a knot is asking for a break, it is a very weak rig, and not at all advisable. MC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike" wrote in message ups.com... snip Apart from which, using the tag end of a knot is asking for a break, it is a very weak rig, and not at all advisable. MC Maybe so, but in 30+ years of fishing for steelhead with a two fly rig, swinging flys on or near the surface, that has been my standard set-up and it has never given me any problem. I almost invariably use hand tied leaders of Maxima Chameleon with 8# tippet and 10# next section. The dropper fly is tied on the 10# tag end. I don't know how many steelhead I've caught in that time, but it has to be high in the thousands with the largest being a 22#er. Many many years ago I thought it was my duty to catch as many steelhead as possible, and in the last season of that period of my evolution as a steelheader I stopped counting 2/3 of the way through the season at 200 fish brought to hand.. Have I had fish break off? Of course, far more than I like to admit. But I can probably count the number that broke off at the first blood knot as a result of using the tag for a dropper on my hands with fingers left over. Most breaks occured: 1. At the connection of the tippet to the point fly, 2. At previously unnoticed rock nicks, or 3. At unnoticed (or to lazy to deal with) wind knots. I have however acquired some leader rings (per your suggestion) and will likely switch over to them so I don't have to replace both the 8# and 10# sections as often. Bob Weinberger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NWC question | pat gustafson | Bass Fishing | 2 | August 15th, 2005 04:30 PM |
droppers for Penn's | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 9 | May 26th, 2005 11:32 AM |
Question | Art Salmons | Bass Fishing | 1 | October 2nd, 2004 04:14 PM |
Dries for droppers | Jarmo Hurri | Fly Fishing | 35 | July 27th, 2004 02:36 PM |
Penn's creek zit droppers | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 4 | May 2nd, 2004 07:17 PM |