![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike,
All these service charges have been going up lately in these tough econmic times. We have to see where every manufacturer is for 2004. -- Bill Kiene Kiene's Fly Shop Sacramento, CA www.kiene.com "Mike" wrote in message ... Cortland only charges 10 bucks Handyman Mike Standing in a river waving a stick |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill:
I'm not so sure the economic times have as much to do with it as dishonesty. For example: a guide told me that he went into his favorite local shop shortly after Orvis introduced the new T3's - which he was admiring. The guide asked the owner what he thought of them. The owner responded that Orvis had the toughest rods, and toughest warranties in the business. The guide challenged him on the "toughest rod" statement, so the owner told the guide to get his rod - he would prove it. The shop owner took the rod, pulled the tip back into a major horseshoe, then released it to smack the corner of the counter, exclaiming that no other rod could take that abuse, while the guide was hollering that the shop owner was going to break the rod. Well, sure enough, when the guide reflexed the tip, the rod broke. The shop owner laughed and said, wow, that really suprises me - go get yourself a new rod off the rack. Example 2: A guide told me that he worked at an Orvis shop in Jackson Hole several years earlier. One day a man came in with the tip section only of a broken rod - but the damage looked rather strange. The man said it had broken on a fish, but he had lost the butt section. After significant questioning, the shop decided that Orvis would have to make the decision, not the shop, since the entire (or major portion) of the rod was not present. The following day a different man brought in the butt section of the same model rod, claiming that it had broken on a fish. The grip showed obvious signs of being run over by a car. Upon questioning, the man admitted that he had laid the rod on the car roof, forgotten it, and driven away. He remembered it some distance down the road, went back, and could only find the butt. Actually, the Orvis warranty would replace the rod under those circumstances (and did so to the apparent owner), but it once again illustrates the burden imposed on all of us by the ethically challenged. I think it more likely that the rod companies are seeing warranty returns far higher than they ever imagined as fisherman decide that a broken rod may net them a new model upgrade. I'm sure it isn't pervasive, but happens enough to be a factor. Jim Ray -- email SPAM countermeasures require removal of allnails to reply "Bill Kiene" wrote in message . com... Hi Mike, All these service charges have been going up lately in these tough econmic times. We have to see where every manufacturer is for 2004. -- Bill Kiene Kiene's Fly Shop Sacramento, CA www.kiene.com "Mike" wrote in message ... Cortland only charges 10 bucks Handyman Mike Standing in a river waving a stick |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jim Ray" wrote: Bill: I'm not so sure the economic times have as much to do with it as dishonesty. For example: a guide told me that he went into his favorite local shop shortly after Orvis introduced the new T3's - which he was admiring. The guide asked the owner what he thought of them. The owner responded that Orvis had the toughest rods, and toughest warranties in the business. The guide challenged him on the "toughest rod" statement, so the owner told the guide to get his rod - he would prove it. The shop owner took the rod, pulled the tip back into a major horseshoe, then released it to smack the corner of the counter, exclaiming that no other rod could take that abuse, while the guide was hollering that the shop owner was going to break the rod. Well, sure enough, when the guide reflexed the tip, the rod broke. The shop owner laughed and said, wow, that really suprises me - go get yourself a new rod off the rack. Example 2: A guide told me that he worked at an Orvis shop in Jackson Hole several years earlier. One day a man came in with the tip section only of a broken rod - but the damage looked rather strange. The man said it had broken on a fish, but he had lost the butt section. After significant questioning, the shop decided that Orvis would have to make the decision, not the shop, since the entire (or major portion) of the rod was not present. The following day a different man brought in the butt section of the same model rod, claiming that it had broken on a fish. The grip showed obvious signs of being run over by a car. Upon questioning, the man admitted that he had laid the rod on the car roof, forgotten it, and driven away. He remembered it some distance down the road, went back, and could only find the butt. Actually, the Orvis warranty would replace the rod under those circumstances (and did so to the apparent owner), but it once again illustrates the burden imposed on all of us by the ethically challenged. I think it more likely that the rod companies are seeing warranty returns far higher than they ever imagined as fisherman decide that a broken rod may net them a new model upgrade. I'm sure it isn't pervasive, but happens enough to be a factor. My friend is a fly shop owner and he told me the reason warranty prices are rising is dishonesty. He said guides will break a rod themselves and send it back to the company at the end of the season. They have down time so they can afford the wait, and it prevents them from having it break on a guide trip and loosing serious $$ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: wrote... My friend is a fly shop owner and he told me the reason warranty prices are rising is dishonesty. He said guides will break a rod themselves and send it back to the company at the end of the season. They have down time so they can afford the wait, and it prevents them from having it break on a guide trip and loosing serious $$ Yeah, those people who slam them in car doors, ceiling fans, etc are just a minor segment of the warranty returns...... What a dumbass! Since the no fault warranty warranty repairs have skyrocketted. So those accidents just happen to dramatically increase? And you call ME a dumbass when I have the facts and the anecdotes from fly shop owners to back it up? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"steve sullivan" wrote in message
... In article , wrote: wrote... My friend is a fly shop owner and he told me the reason warranty prices are rising is dishonesty. He said guides will break a rod themselves and send it back to the company at the end of the season. They have down time so they can afford the wait, and it prevents them from having it break on a guide trip and loosing serious $$ Yeah, those people who slam them in car doors, ceiling fans, etc are just a minor segment of the warranty returns...... What a dumbass! Since the no fault warranty warranty repairs have skyrocketted. So those accidents just happen to dramatically increase? And you call ME a dumbass when I have the facts and the anecdotes from fly shop owners to back it up? You don't have any facts, just the opinion of one flyshop owner, and it doesn't make sense. I sincerely doubt guides will intentionally break a rod at the end of the guiding year. I have never intentionally broken a rod, and none of the folks I guide with do either. In fact, about the only time I break a rod is when I am fishing on my own, and when it happens, it usually through something pretty spectacular like a fall. You should take a closer look at the stated reasons for guides breaking fly rods intentionally. According to you, if a guide intentionally breaks a rod at the end of the season, it won't happen on a guided trip? That is just plain ridiculous. In the first case, it presupposes that fly rods wear out in a year. That is nonsense. Secondly, clients typically use their own rods, not the guides'. Guides will carry spare rods in case of accidents, and these rods would never see enough use by a client to wear out so that a guide would consider breaking it. Thirdly, fly rods break for a variety of reasons, and a new rod is a likely to snap as an old rod. Breakage is not predictable, and a pretty low probability event that few really worry about, short of carrying a few spares with them. I think the point Warren was trying to make, and it is a good one, is that guides are a relatively small component of the rod market. There are many, many, more anglers than there are guides. The reason fly rod replacements have increased is because of the increase in rod sales to the general public, not to guides. Tim Lysyk timlysyk at telus dot net |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Lysyk" wrote in message news:k%5yb.208979$jy.156982@clgrps13... .....I think the point Warren was trying to make, and it is a good one, is that guides are a relatively small component of the rod market. There are many, many, more anglers than there are guides. The reason fly rod replacements have increased is because of the increase in rod sales to the general public, not to guides. True.....very true. However, in fairness, I believe it should be made clear that Warren was evidently also making another point.......that Mr. Sullivan is a "dumbass". I think it is always a mistake in this forum to gloss over such an accurate assessment made on the first try. Wolfgang who realizes, of course, that it may have been a lucky guess but really, the correct answer is of greater import than is the process by which it was derived. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wolfgang" wrote in message
... True.....very true. However, in fairness, I believe it should be made clear that Warren was evidently also making another point.......that Mr. Sullivan is a "dumbass". I think it is always a mistake in this forum to gloss over such an accurate assessment made on the first try. Wolfgang who realizes, of course, that it may have been a lucky guess but really, the correct answer is of greater import than is the process by which it was derived. You are right, Wolfgang, I should not have glossed over Warren's assesment, but I felt it was so obviously accurate that I did not need to belabor the point. I'll just go back to snapping all my rod tips now. Tim Lysyk timlysyk at telus dot net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|