![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe the wise, you always have a way with words.
Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "Joe Haubenreich" wrote in message ... "Josh" wrote in message ... snip Just wondering how rest of you feel. ok...shoot. -- God Bless America Josh The Bad Bear ------------- Josh, this got me thinking.... Warning: this turned out to be a long response. In my reply to Jack, I stated my belief that scents are ineffective in attracting bass. That's not to say they don't make a difference in your fishing. Here's a distinction that may be obvious to most readers already: while scents may not influence the hunted, they undoubtedly have an impact on the hunt. Wouldn't you say a whole lot of what we do as anglers falls in the category of ritual rather than true fishing science? I think one of the things we enjoy about our sport is that it has evolved its own bass angling culture. And as with every culture, this one has its rituals. Some are grounded in fact... others in mystical lore and superstition. Pistol Pete Maravitch wore the same pair of gym socks (without laundering) to keep his winning streak going. Construction workers top out a building with a conifer tree. Blood from his first deer is (in some cultures) smeared on a young hunter's face. Religious people practice rituals to greet the day, celebrate a meal, initiate special events, invoke blessing for travel, and so forth. The boys I grew up with could be counted on to produce a buckeye among the contents of their jeans pockets, and they usually carried a lucky marble or stone, too. Just as native Americans stepping out of their wickiup tapped the deerskin pouch hung by a thong around their neck or belted at their side to make certain their talismans were secure, I pat my pocket as I head to the truck to make sure my old pocket knife -- not just any knife, but the "right" one -- is in its place. The familiar shape that wears a hole over the of every pair of jeans I own confers a sense of "everything is in its place." Some bass anglers feel unprepared if they're not wearing their lucky hats, shirts, or shoes. Others, noticing that the landing net seems often to be out of reach when they hang onto a big bass, deliberately leave it in the rod locker in order to increase their odds. I have an unreasonable preference for my red Ambassadeur reels over the plain aluminum ones, even through the guts are identical since I've long ago replaced all the brass bushings with ball bearings. One of Bubba's bass fishing rituals was to reach down, pick up a bottle, and pump one spray of anise-scented oil on his lure every tenth cast. Do these rituals affect the fish? That's doubtful. Do they increase our catch rate. If they serve to relax or focus us so that we feel more comfortable and are mentally better prepared to react to opportunities the bass present, then maybe they do. A whiff of anise has the power to transport me back through the years. Once or twice each season, I'll rummage deep in my tackle box, pull out a small, yellowed plastic bottle, and squirt a few drops of the scent on my bait just to conjure up the shades of my long-departed friend and of the huge bass we caught together. Does it help me catch bass? Who cares? It helps me enjoy my fishing experience. Should a manufacturer stop making "feel good" products, or should we anglers be made to feel like idiots for having and using them? Of course not. After all, this is a "feel good" sport we engage in -- not one based on our need for meat or driven entirely on effectiveness, performance, and productivity. In the final analysis, most of us fish to relax, achieve some sort of harmony, relieve stress, or enjoy our solitude for awhile. If rituals helps us achieve that, then we're probably going to keep on observing them -- even though someone correctly points out that the rituals in themselves have no discernable effect on our quarry. If an angler feels like smearing his body with rotton shad and earthworms, aligning the equipment just so on his boat deck, coating his baits with scented oils, painting his face blue, and chanting Gaelic war songs as he leaves the ramp and he thinks any of this will help him achieve his objectives, I say more power to him.... sit back and enjoy the show. Now.... about endorsements. Repeat after me.... "It's all entertainment." TV news.... entertainment. TV news reporting is not about the pursuit of truth, but about ratings. Ratings drive profits, and entertainment value drive ratings. Bass tournaments and all other sports.... entertainment. Product placements.... entertainment. Technological advancements in fishing gear, electronics, boats and motors.... entertainment. Pros don't sell products; mostly they sell dreams. They sell "be like me." Remember "I wanna be like Mike"? Five foot-eight inch me wearing a Chicago Bulls jersey and Nikes had absolutely no chance of dunking a basketball, much less playing in the NBA, but who cares? I may buy some Kelly Springfield tires for my pickup one of these days. Think they'll help me catch bass like Hank Parker? Should I put the battery in my boat that Jimmy Houston has in his? Would it help to have the make of boat that Kevin Van Dam drives. Will they help me be a better bass angler? Sure they will.... about as much as coating my baits with anise-flavored oil. My point is just this -- a pro who is hired to promote a product or does so on his television show is selling a dream, and people who want to buy into the dream purchase and use the products. Should a pro prefer the brand of rod, boat, lure, or sunscreen he's promoting? That would be nice. Do some products actually help one catch bass. Sure they do; there is some science in this sport, after all. But much of what we surround ourselves with in our bass fishing culture is just there for our entertainment and amusement. As long as you keep all this straight, I think the ethics of endorsements becomes less of a weighty matter. Joe |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just waiting for Rich Z to chime in so we can resume the gasoline
challenge. John Kerr, you know your stuff. If you want to know the morality & (more importantly) personality of a pro, go fishing with him. In fact, if you want to get to know anyone... Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "John Kerr" wrote in message ... I don't judge a pro's morality as relates to endorsements...it is part of the business. I do respect honesty though. I like my son's attitude, he is on staff with Strike Pro lures, and has several signature lures out by them...but when he won the Open, and they did a big feature on him, John insisted that they tell the real story...he was fishing a Spook, not a Strike Pro lure. He did go on to say that Strike Pro makes some of his favorite lures, and that he fishes them consistently. I was impressed that Strike Pro went along with it and published it as John insisted on. (Although they did get the bottom line in their favor, "Open winner prefers Strike Pro lures!) in BIG print g. I think every individual decides for themselves what level of morality they adhere to...and I certainly wouldn't judge that decision. I personally take endorsements with a grain of salt. As for scents...I have no idea of the effectiveness, I have used them, but my confidence is more in the selection and "presentation" of the bait than anything else! JK |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They're all over wherever you have a rocky river Bob, especially in the
northland. I had a jet on my aluminum rig for a few years, fun toy. They work especially well on aluminum tunnel-drives. Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "Bob La Londe" wrote in message s.com... "Steve @ OutdoorFrontiers" wrote in message ... "Bob La Londe" wrote in messageSNIP I'ld have to say that glass boats certainly have their place. I have two of them, (The Skeeter is for sale) but a well rounded TV show might need to be open to possibilites that aren't necessarily your own. You might consider other options. An aluminum jet would be the perfect boat in some circumstances. I love my Baker tunnel hull, but I just ordered a Waco 16 for back water running myself. If you could have balanced that out with the potential sponsor you might have been able to offer more and serve more useful information to more viewers. JMHO. I do understand your view, and I agree with you. I'm just not sure that you shouldn't be open to other possibilities in your base choice about glass boats. Oh, I'm not saying that I won't ever film a show from anything other than a glass boat. That's not it and if circumstances warrant a change, i.e. sturgeon fishing on the Snake River, or fishing some remote backwater, I'll certainly use what is appropriate. But, much of what I'll be doing can be done from a glass boat. I might have to reconsider my choices and go with more of a multi-species boat. The ultimate would be to get a sponsor that has both a glass and aluminum line of boats and get one of each! Any offers? :-) -- You said aluminum jet. I know of lots of aluminum boats, but can think off hand of only one that has a jet boat setup for fishing. They have both. In fact I considered buying one earlier this year. -- The Security Consultant http://www.diycomponents.com Bob La Londe - Owner 849 S Ave C Yuma, Az 85364 (928)782-9765 ofc (928)782-7873 fax |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rodney has brown eyes.
Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "Craig" wrote in message ... I never had a problem with Rodney. I like the old Goat Farmer. I don't have a problem with anybody that wants to sell anything fishing related here. But the charter police will give you a hard time. -- Craig Baugher |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely Rich. These guys are working just like us. Roland Martin jumped
ship from Ranger to Triton in the blink of an eye. No problem there. Warren -- http://www.fishingworld.com/MesaTackleSupply/ http://www.outdoorfrontiers.com http://www.secretweaponlures.com http://www.warrenwolk.com/ http://www.tri-statebassmasters.com/ "RG" wrote in message ... I'd guess that you could apply the "THIS is GOOD! " program to every pro in every sport for everything they endorse. Is a Merc a better engine that Johns/Suz/Yam/issan ??? or does the pro ride it because he either gets paid or gets the motor/boat/bait/reel/rod/shirt/pants/tacklebox/etc etc. cheaper or even for free?? Of course he gets a "deal" to endorse the product. Better not stop at scents. Does Tiger Woods reeaaalllly use Nike clubs or whatever??? Perhaps not... I've heard that they are made to the specs of some other brand of club that he liked. You and I can't even buy the same thing. At least I can buy the same scents, if I want to ( I think ). The reality is... if the guy is a pro, he is endorsing SOMETHING that may or may not work as well for us as it does for him. The simple answer is a pro is a pro and has to do it to make his living doing what he loves. It is NO different in baseball, football, ( do you really think those ugly nose bandages help a running back run?? ) or tennis, etc.. A well sponsored pro is a well paid ( you insert the WORD of your choice here), and everyone knows it. It, unfortunately, is the sports program that we all support by buying the same stuff that they sell. But, sell it is.. the product may or may not really work as well as the pro makes out.....and I suspect everyone knows that. RichG |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Have scent impregnated lures worked? Yes...... I perfer to make them with scent in them. But as people who know me also know the idea behind my thought of scents. Garlic..... Cover scent only, we dont use it for more or we would be using it as bait. Shad/craw... Both are great. Bass do eat both of them. I have been working on a swim bait and use a unreal shad scent in them. Anise.. well, this one has a great option built in to it too. Both as a cover scent and atracting. Spray on,,,,,, Gee get it wet and it just comes off. (a no brainer here) Have it cooked into the plastic and it doesnt come out and lasts for a long time. This is how I use scents int he baits I make. Ask the people who went up to the NWC, or even ask Steve, He has done some damage with them. Jeff -- COOL LURES The Lures that put FISH on ICE! www.coollures.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|