![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 7:09 pm, Halfordian Golfer wrote:
On Sep 16, 10:16 am, Mike wrote: Considerations on angling for stock fish. I have a numbre of objections to angling for stocked rainbow trout. These are based entirely on the facts known to me, and are not a result of "snobbery" or any other such silly considerations, as some people seem to assume. 1. The use of such fish is a massive drain on the environment. 2. There is no sensible comparison whatsoever between such fish and any wild fish. 3. Although such fish may appear outwardly similar to wild fish, after a period in suitable conditions, they do not behave like wild fish. In many cases being almost tame, and can be caught easily using various tricks, or completely outlandish concoctions such as power bait, to which they have been accustomed artificailly. They may also be easily caught using crushed trout pellets. Many of the flies used to catch such fish have no counterparts in nature, and are taken by the fish mainly as a result of their extreme conditioning during rearing to react to food items in a particular manner. They have been been conditioned to do so, and rarely possess even a fraction of the wariness of wild fish. Especialy when in shoals, which they often maintain until they are caught or die, they are extremely competitive. 4. In the majority of cases, these fish are badly contaminated with accumulated poisons and toxins. This is also a result of being fed on processed fishmeal, which concentrates various toxins, mainly in the fatty cells of such fish, and also the chenical and other complex drug residues used in their production. 5. I find the production of such animals purely for the purpose of playing with them distasteful. They are produced at great cost, damage, and danger to the environment, purely for the personal gratification of anglers who wish to fish for them. This is not at all the same thing as directly farming a food source. 6 As a result of the concentration on such practices, rivers and other natural environments are being more and more negelected, and even considered "inferior", because nothing even remotely resembling the number and amount of fish can be caught there, and anglers expectations have as a result of this, been raised far beyond what is normal, or even remotely sensible in this regard. massive amounts of money and resources are being wasted in order to provide personal and "convenient" gratification to anglers, which would be far better spent on improving the environment, and not in activel destroying it. 7. Also as a result of conditioning, many of these fish will only feed at certain times, corresponding to the feeding times in the hatcheries and feeding stews in which they were reared. Such aberrant behaviour is often referred to as "the evening rise". In some places where the fish have time to become acclimatised, ( although they never entirely lose their conditioning), this may even be the case, but it is mainly the result of conditioning to feed at a certain time. There are a number of other reasons as well, but those are the main ones. TL MC Good post Mike. There is definitely counter points to be, respectfully, made. 1) In Colorado, there is an exceptional fishery in the mountain and plain lakes that, up until a 100 years ago were completely devoid of fish. A lot of private hatcheries stocked the water including the famous boulder rod and gun club. This activity *created* teh fishery. 2) There is also the consideration that stocked trout in places like St. Vrain State Park, old gravel quarries, absorb a tremendous amount of recreational pressure. 3) The license revenue generated from stocked trout draws interest and moneys for research. 4) 100% of the Brown, Rainbow and Brook trout fishery is the descendant result of stocking programs. 5) In many cases the very nicest fish you catch, one full of color, fight and firm healthy trout is simply the multiple year hold over. Personally, I get the Jones to bang a few stockers and eat them at least once or twice a season. Some of the new diets makes the flesh orange and the fish relatively tasty, especially brined and smoked. I'm not too proud to crack a cool one and take a few of the stocked trout out of he http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/StVrain/ In fact, they did something pretty cool out there last year. What used to be the back ponds that you could drive all around have been closed off as hiking access only. If you walk a mile or two you can leave just about all the rest of the fishermen. Best regards, Tim Dang, I sure wish I would have proof-read that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fish Better With The Right Fishing Gear | [email protected] | General Discussion | 0 | June 17th, 2007 11:14 AM |
True Fish Story..Fishing Bet #1 | alwaysfishking | Bass Fishing | 10 | May 28th, 2005 05:07 AM |
Stocked bows | D Screen | Fly Fishing | 23 | February 23rd, 2005 01:19 PM |
Fly Fishing As The Humane Way To Fish | tmon | Fly Fishing | 26 | June 10th, 2004 08:07 AM |
Fish finders - Ice fishing | hermit | Bass Fishing | 6 | September 25th, 2003 06:23 PM |