![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've actually dove into this subject with other DNR's of various states, and
the conclusion seems to be the same in case studies. Some are inconclusive while others show no doubt to the result. While it seems that some(Bass) inevitably return, a lot don't, and the ones that don't can in fact affect the watershed. It seems that a large single system has much better results with Bass returning than a water system with channels and connected lakes, but even then, some still do not return, but stay in the area of their release. Most DNR's it seems agree that there's not enough evidence yet to conclude to what degree it effects any one body of water, hence no laws to govern this formally yet. Josh, I am familiar with the Calumet River, and the little, and I've fished that often for a few years, but now it's been a few years since I've been there. Good Steelhead and salmon run there! Or it used to be anyway. It's funny that I've never fished for Bass there, it just never really struck me as a good Bass hole! Now that's interesting! No matter what the cause of the decline of fishing anywhere, it's a bad thing all the way around when a local hole gets ate up. But it would be good knowledge to know whether it was the fishing pressure, as Dan suggested, or the catch and release that were the culprit for the decline. Either way, it has been negatively impacted by the tournament, it seems. I'm not downing the tournament fishermen, (hell, I fish a local here and there) but maybe some rethinking can be done to minimize the impact that it might have on a particular watershed. Personally, I would like to think I could take my kids to some of the same fishing holes I've enjoyed over the years, and know there's still some nice ones in there to catch. In a single large body of water, it's not as much of an issue, but in connected body's, it COULD be. Kindest regards, And as always, Tight Lines, Doug 57 Degree's and rising today! Not much ice left! yippee!! "Dan, danl" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:35:26 -0500, "Joshuall" wrote: Doug, Interesting indeed. Here's a personal observation shared by a lot of guys in this area. We used to fish a not so pretty place called the Calumet River which flows out of Lake Mich. Many years ago we caught limits and double limits of 3, 4 & 5 lb. fish. Some feel and I tend to agree, that after the Bass Masters Classic held here (and prob one of the worst in history) that the fish never really returned to the river. Many were released into lake Mich and subsequent tourneys did much of the same. I dont' know if there's any truth to it all, but it seemed the pressure got up after that and the release site for several tourney's even went across the border into Ind. The fishing in the river was never the same after that big event and it's subsequent spotlight on the river. Just a thought. Ever give any thought to the fact that all the publicity brought out many more people fishing for Bass including people that eat them? Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Important medical study | Joe McIntosh | Fly Fishing | 1 | April 26th, 2006 02:26 AM |
Horseshoe Lake WA Warmwatrer Fishery Study | John | Bass Fishing | 0 | August 14th, 2005 08:00 AM |
Anglers Have Big Impact on Fish Numbers -- Study | Garrison L. Hilliard | Catfish Fishing | 0 | August 27th, 2004 06:09 AM |