![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 24, 10:29*pm, "Mark Bowen" wrote:
"Tom Littleton" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . What makes _you_ think that? *And no, Medicare is not a single payer system. because the power of negotiation will remove some of the bloated costs built in, for starters. With the current system, a ton of breakdowns into various insured groups almost ensures a lack of transparent price structures. And, given human nature invites vast overpricing and profit taking. That said, I'm with Jeff in saying that healthcare ought to be treated as a societal benefit, or as he put it, a right of citizenship, not a for-profit business. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom I think our state and federal governments should sell the nation’s highways, roads, and streets to for-profit organizations. That way we all pay to travel to and from work, the grocery store, day care, your favorite bar, the dentist, anywhere and anytime you or I might drive. Just think of the profit potential. I mean, why should we pay highway usage or fuel taxes for our government to maintain our roadways, when private organizations could obviously provide better maintenance, construction, and means of usage. I mean it is not as if use of the nation’s roadways is a constitutionally protected right, right? Kelo vs. New London (I believe this is the case name) determined that the public transfer of one private entities property to another private entity for the purpose of economic development trumps the rights of the individual. Hell, I say the government should exercise its right of eminent domain over all U.S. citizens and transfer all private property from private individuals to other private individual, *who can *claim* that they will put the property to better economic purposes, which thereby serves the public interest better. What makes travel to anywhere, anymore important than one's health. Hell, once we transer the nation's roadways to the for-profit companies and make travel on the nation's roadways so expensive that we cannot affort to drive to *and from work, get our groceries, pick up little Cindy Lou Hoo from daycare, travel to your doctor's office, or the hospital to have another child delivered, healthcare reform will appear insignificant in comparison. Op An even better plan than it appears at first glance. Not because it makes the cost of health care reform appear insignificant by comparison, but because it moots the issue. Who cares what health care costs if no one can get to it? Which, if you think about it, is pretty much the situation tens of millions of Americans are already in. Spread the pain a bit and everybody's happy! ![]() giles |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - Something more interesting than politics. | BJ Conner | Fly Fishing | 5 | April 23rd, 2008 11:54 PM |
OT. Politics | Mike Connor | Fly Fishing | 7 | December 27th, 2005 07:24 AM |
OT. Politics? | Mike Connor | Fly Fishing | 0 | October 19th, 2005 07:33 AM |
OT Politics | Mike Connor | Fly Fishing | 103 | December 29th, 2003 09:56 PM |