![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They do seem to have either good short term memory or they talk to one
another. Sometimes, I'll go out to my little nearly private bass pond. I'll catch the heck out of bunch of bass on some new lure. Suddenly..not a bite! Next day and for weeks after, I can't get bit on the same lure under similar circumstances. If I wait a year, or even a couple of months..that lure will once again work... for a while.. Strange little beasts, aren't they??? -- RichG http://groups.msn.com/CarolinaSkiffOwners |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichG wrote:
Strange little beasts, aren't they??? You ain't just whistling Dixie. I just read an interesting post on TFF about bass behavior. copy/paste: Jesse Parker did a survey on Lake Fork several years ago. He had a study of several dozen trophy fish. He advertised a bounty for any bass between 10 and 13 pounds that did not qualify for Share a Lunker program. He had the angler complete a survey and then had local business donate money for the fiberglass reproduction of the fish. He then tagged the bass and released them all from the same location. On the tag was a bounty for any angler who caught the fish again. The second angler then completed the same survery, un-aware of the the first survey. They were paid cash money for the second bounty as well. The results were increadible. The first fish to be re-caught was caught three days later. She had travel 17 miles by water, caught within casting distance of her first catch. Over the course of the next year, the majority of these fish were re-caught. The results were almost identical for the most part. The vast majority of the fish, came from the same area, during the same lunar cycle, and most often, caught on the same or very simular type bait. The results were published in an Angler's Choice magazine back in 1997 or so. I know Jesse personally and he let me review the surveys one evening himself. It was quite increadible. Due to the expense of the program, it only lasted one year. But when you have two anglers who complete the same survey with no knowledge of what the other one said, it was remarkable. It really opened my eyes to how fish migrated and responded to tournament pressure. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for sharing that Henry, That was very interesting
"Henry Hefner" wrote in message ... RichG wrote: Strange little beasts, aren't they??? You ain't just whistling Dixie. I just read an interesting post on TFF about bass behavior. copy/paste: Jesse Parker did a survey on Lake Fork several years ago. He had a study of several dozen trophy fish. He advertised a bounty for any bass between 10 and 13 pounds that did not qualify for Share a Lunker program. He had the angler complete a survey and then had local business donate money for the fiberglass reproduction of the fish. He then tagged the bass and released them all from the same location. On the tag was a bounty for any angler who caught the fish again. The second angler then completed the same survery, un-aware of the the first survey. They were paid cash money for the second bounty as well. The results were increadible. The first fish to be re-caught was caught three days later. She had travel 17 miles by water, caught within casting distance of her first catch. Over the course of the next year, the majority of these fish were re-caught. The results were almost identical for the most part. The vast majority of the fish, came from the same area, during the same lunar cycle, and most often, caught on the same or very simular type bait. The results were published in an Angler's Choice magazine back in 1997 or so. I know Jesse personally and he let me review the surveys one evening himself. It was quite increadible. Due to the expense of the program, it only lasted one year. But when you have two anglers who complete the same survey with no knowledge of what the other one said, it was remarkable. It really opened my eyes to how fish migrated and responded to tournament pressure. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alwayfishking wrote:
Thanks for sharing that Henry, That was very interesting Makes me wonder.......... 17 miles? How did she navigate? Smell? Surely she wasn't THAT familiar with that many square miles of water. I guess there are different kinds of smarts. I know people who can get lost in a small shopping mall, but I don't think you could fool them with the same fake food over and over and over. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know people who can get lost in a small shopping mall
The latest radio spot I heard for Onstar features a woman who can't find her car in a parking lot. If you're that stupid, you have A, no business driving, and B, no business making enough money to afford a vehicle with that kind of technology. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "J Buck" wrote in message ... I know people who can get lost in a small shopping mall The latest radio spot I heard for Onstar features a woman who can't find her car in a parking lot. If you're that stupid, you have A, no business driving, and B, no business making enough money to afford a vehicle with that kind of technology. I have lost rental cars in parking lots. Came out a different door at McDonald-Douglas in Long Beach, CA. Would of loved an Onstar sytem, or even a panic button to honk the horn. For those who have never been in the LB area, the parking lot, probably can hold 15,000 cars. Couple of yours to find that little car, between a camper and a truck. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Makes me wonder.......... 17 miles? How did she navigate? Smell? Surely
she wasn't THAT familiar with that many square miles of water I took that comment to mean she traveled 17 miles in a boat, to be weighted, then back to be released. Ronnie http://fishing.about.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Makes me wonder.......... 17 miles? How did she navigate? Smell? Surely
she wasn't THAT familiar with that many square miles of water I took that comment to mean she traveled 17 miles in a boat, to be weighted, then back to be released. Ronnie http://fishing.about.com OK, trigger finger too fast. I went back and read it again, and see the bass were all released at the same place, not carried back to where they were caught. It is amazing they can get back home, especially that fast. Ronnie http://fishing.about.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Mar 2004, RGarri7470 wrote:
... It is amazing they can get back home, especially that fast. Just remember all those eels from all around the world finding their way to Sargasso Sea every year ... and still many people will tell you eel is inferior to bass :-) Cheers, Nikolay |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fish much smarter than we imagined | John | General Discussion | 14 | October 8th, 2003 10:39 PM |